Georgia summers are notoriously hot and humid. For most residents, relief is found indoors, shielded by air conditioning. But for tens of thousands incarcerated in Georgia’s state prisons, the oppressive summer heat can be not just unbearable but deadly. A recent landmark ruling in Texas could provide a roadmap for Georgia prison reform advocates to finally force meaningful change.
Deadly Heat and Human Rights
In March 2025, U.S. District Judge Robert Pittman issued a historic ruling that declared the extreme heat conditions in Texas prisons unconstitutional. Judge Pittman found that exposure to intense heat, sometimes exceeding 120°F inside cells, constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. His decision demanded that Texas implement immediate measures, including installing air conditioning in state prisons, to safeguard prisoners from extreme heat 1 2.
The ruling has major implications far beyond Texas, highlighting that denying prisoners access to humane conditions, including adequate temperature control, violates fundamental human rights. For Georgia prisons, where climate control is virtually non-existent in inmate housing areas, this Texas precedent could serve as powerful persuasive authority.
Georgia’s Dangerous Heat Problem
Georgia’s geographic location makes summers intensely hot and exceptionally humid, especially in the southern part of the state where most prisons are located. Temperatures frequently surpass 100°F, with humidity pushing heat indexes to lethal levels. The National Weather Service notes that prolonged exposure to heat indices above 103°F can cause severe heat-related illnesses, including heat stroke, a life-threatening condition 3.
Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) facilities generally lack climate control, with inmates often housed in poorly ventilated buildings that trap heat, turning them into veritable ovens during summer months. Temperatures inside cells frequently exceed 110°F, creating conditions that are unsafe for any human being, let alone vulnerable populations such as older inmates and those with chronic medical conditions.
The Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) acknowledges limited cooling measures—often only a single air-conditioned building per facility—forcing most inmates to endure conditions akin to a “cement pizza oven” throughout the summer 4.
Medical and Humanitarian Crisis
Studies have repeatedly shown that extreme heat exacerbates chronic illnesses, increases medical emergencies, and significantly raises mortality risks, particularly for older or medically compromised individuals. A report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clearly states that heat exposure dramatically increases cardiovascular stress, worsens diabetes management, and complicates psychiatric disorders 5.
In Georgia prisons, where healthcare services are already severely limited, extreme heat compounds these issues. Prisoners frequently report inadequate access to medical care even during emergencies. Overcrowding further exacerbates heat problems, as prisons house far more inmates than originally intended, limiting ventilation and increasing body heat in confined spaces 6.
The dangers of these conditions aren’t theoretical. In July 2023, 27-year-old Juan Carlos Ramirez tragically died at Telfair State Prison after being left outside in temperatures reaching 96°F, causing his body temperature to spike to a fatal 107°F 7. Such incidents underscore the critical need to address Georgia’s extreme prison heat immediately.
Advocates note Georgia prisons routinely see inmates desperately scrambling for ice, soaking bedsheets, or even risking disciplinary action by flooding their cells just for relief. Yet these measures are inadequate against relentless summer heat and humidity 4.
Constitutional Rights Ignored
Judge Pitman’s Texas ruling clearly establishes that failing to protect inmates from extreme heat violates constitutional protections. Legal experts believe this ruling, though made in another federal circuit, provides persuasive authority for similar challenges in Georgia.
In both states, incarcerated populations are subjected to life-threatening heat, lack effective heat mitigation, and have suffered preventable deaths. The Texas ruling detailed conditions that closely resemble those reported in Georgia facilities, particularly in southern institutions like Valdosta State Prison, Ware State Prison, and Macon State Prison 8.
The Financial Cost of Neglect
Though Georgia officials often cite cost as a barrier to installing air conditioning, the economic argument against heat mitigation is shortsighted. Texas spent millions defending its inhumane conditions in court and faces substantial compliance costs following Judge Pittman’s ruling. Proactively addressing heat through infrastructure upgrades is both a moral and financial imperative, potentially saving taxpayers substantial sums by reducing medical emergencies, litigation, and operational disruptions.
States that have implemented climate control solutions have seen decreases in heat-related illnesses, lower medical expenses, and improved institutional stability, highlighting that humane treatment can also be fiscally responsible 9 10.
Legal Path Forward in Georgia
Judge Pittman’s decision provides a strong model for Georgia advocates. Though Georgia is in a different federal circuit, the Texas ruling carries significant persuasive weight, setting a clear judicial recognition that failing to address extreme heat violates constitutional rights. Advocates and families of incarcerated individuals in Georgia can leverage this precedent to pressure the GDC and lawmakers, potentially through lawsuits mirroring the Texas case.
Georgia’s Looming Legal Battle
Given Judge Pitman’s decision, Georgia prisons are prime candidates for similar federal lawsuits. With clear parallels to Texas in climate, inmate demographics, and inadequate heat mitigation, advocates argue the same constitutional logic applies. Texas prisons face eventual court orders to install comprehensive air conditioning—a costly consequence of years of neglecting prisoners’ basic rights 2.
Georgia could soon confront a similar reality. Litigation around heat exposure is already emerging in southern states, including Louisiana and New Mexico. Georgia’s history of inmate deaths and injuries from heat exposure, like Ramirez’s case, further amplifies the urgency for reform and accountability 7.
Legal experts suggest that documenting specific instances of harm caused by heat, along with temperature and humidity data, could significantly bolster a constitutional challenge in Georgia. Advocates must collect rigorous data and personal testimonies, demonstrating the urgency and human toll of Georgia’s inaction on extreme heat.
The Call to Advocates
Georgia advocates, families of incarcerated individuals, and concerned citizens must seize this momentum. The Texas ruling provides a powerful roadmap for litigation that could finally force Georgia to address this inhumane crisis.
It’s time for organized legal action mirroring the successful Texas strategy. Class-action lawsuits highlighting Georgia’s deadly prison heat conditions and the deliberate indifference of state officials are both justified and urgently needed.
We challenge advocates to prepare for lawsuits that clearly document prison temperatures, medical impacts, and state negligence, using the Texas case as persuasive authority. The precedent is clear:
Extreme heat in prisons is not just uncomfortable—it’s unconstitutional.
Act Now
Join the fight against inhumane prison conditions. Contact your local advocacy groups, legislators, and legal experts to support or initiate litigation. Use tools like Impact Justice AI (https://ImpactJustice.AI) to easily communicate your concerns directly to policymakers.
Together, we can ensure Georgia prisons no longer operate as deadly ovens but uphold the human dignity and constitutional rights of all incarcerated individuals.
- Judge Pittman Ruling, https://www.texastribune.org/2025/03/26/texas-prison-air-conditioning-lawsuit/#:~:text=Housing%20Texas%20prison%20inmates%20in,page%20ruling[↩]
- WSB TV, https://www.wsbtv.com/news/extreme-heat-without/J6PO6ULLCNC2DGQA7UFKKWSPMY/#:~:text=Last%20year%20in%20a%20hearing%2C,9%20Celsius[↩][↩]
- National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/safety/heat-index[↩]
- Georgia Public Broadcasting, https://www.gpb.org/news/2022/08/16/lots-of-things-drive-violence-in-prison-add-heat-the-list[↩][↩]
- CDC Heat Illness Report, https://www.cdc.gov/heat-health/risk-factors/heat-and-chronic-conditions.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fextreme-heat%2Frisk-factors%2Fextreme-heat-and-chronic-conditions.html [↩]
- Georgia Prison Crisis, https://gps.press/death-by-neglect-how-georgia-prisons-fail-to-provide-medical-care/[↩]
- Associated Press, https://apnews.com/article/georgia-prison-death-heat-lawsuit-department-corrections-27b73f63e450bb10f29098ad2e1c26e2[↩][↩]
- Politico, https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/05/prison-heat-air-conditioning-00160676#:~:text=The%20end%20result%3A%20The%20vast,also%20without%20complete%20air%20conditioning[↩]
- ACLU Report on Prison Heat, https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/09/susi.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com[↩]
- ACLU on Prison Heat, https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/dangerous-threat-heat-related-illness-prompts-appeals-court-affirm-order-cool[↩]
1 thought on “Heat, Humidity, and the Constitution”