GDC Policy LibraryTopics

Policy Synthesis

Parole Board Process and Hearing Preparation

Synthesized from 30 SOPs  ·  11 directly cited  ·  updated May 2, 2026

Georgia Department of Corrections policy establishes a structured process by which facilities prepare inmates for parole review, including mandatory case file documentation, timeline requirements, and eligibility screening. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles retains ultimate authority over parole decisions, and GDC facilities serve a supporting role by generating Parole Review Summaries, tracking performance incentive credits, classifying inmates, and coordinating placement into transitional or alternative programs as directed by the Board. Several related SOPs address the mechanics of case preparation, the criteria that can enhance or delay parole consideration, and the pathways through which the Parole Board directs inmate placement.

Overview of the GDC–Parole Board Relationship

The Georgia Department of Corrections does not grant parole — that authority belongs exclusively to the State Board of Pardons and Paroles (SBPP). GDC's written policy establishes the Department as a supporting actor: generating case summaries, classifying inmates, tracking program participation, and executing Board-ordered placements. The core procedural document governing this relationship is SOP 220.07 (Guidelines for Completing the Parole Review Summary). Additional SOPs address eligibility screening for specialized programs, performance incentive credits, transitional center placements, boot camp assignments, and the mechanics of release-date determination for parolees returned to custody.

The Parole Review Summary: Timing and Submission Requirements

Under SOP 220.07, the SBPP generates a monthly computer printout listing inmates potentially eligible for advance release — meaning release in advance of their Tentative Parole Month (TPM) or Maximum Release (Max Out) date. Each facility must complete a Parole Review Summary (Attachment 1 to that SOP) within 30 days of receiving the printout and forward it to the Parole Board's Processing Unit. The stated purpose is to give the Board's Processing Unit 120 days of lead time to review summaries and identify inmates rated above average for advance release.

The review cycle begins six months in advance of any potential benefit to the inmate — whether that is an advance release before the TPM or a release before the Max Out date. SOP 220.07 explicitly warns: "If there is delay, it will not be possible to process the inmate prior to the advance release date."

Who completes the summary? The inmate's assigned counselor is the responsible party. MH/MR Counselors are specifically assigned responsibility for completing the summary on Mental Health Offenders. In either case, the counselor must also enter a case note in SCRIBE documenting that the review has been completed. If the inmate has been transferred, the losing facility must notify the gaining facility to complete the summary using information already in the file.

Eligibility Criteria for Advance Release Consideration

SOP 220.07 identifies the following criteria that must be assessed in the Parole Review Summary:

1. No Greatest Severity or High Severity disciplinary reports in the six months prior to the Parole Board's consideration date, and no TPM extensions during that period.

2. Active participation in work, education, and/or treatment programs (including alcohol and drug programs specifically), to the extent offered at the facility, as specified by the Work/Activity Plan and Status Report.

3. Custody classification: the inmate must be classified as close, medium, minimum, or trusty status.

4. Positive recommendations from the assigned counselor and the Warden or Superintendent.

5. No more than one escape on record.

If a recommended TPM extension is generated during the review process, the inmate is automatically removed from advance release consideration.

Sentence Computation and Key Parole Terminology

Board Rule 125-2-4-.04 (SOP 1291) establishes the foundational definitions for sentence computation that underlie all parole timing:

  • Tentative Parole Month (TPM): The tentative month and year set by the Parole Board for potential parole release. A TPM is established for all inmates except those with life or death sentences and sentences of twelve months or less.
  • Maximum Release Date (MRD): The date an inmate would be released if the entire sentence were served without parole.
  • Parole Consideration Date (PCD): Applicable only to life sentences and parole revocations; represents when the Board would consider the inmate for parole.
  • Non-running Time and Non-earning Time: Periods (such as escape, toll time, or revocation periods) that can extend sentence end dates or exclude time from earned-time calculations.

These definitions directly control when the 120-day review clock in SOP 220.07 begins.

Performance Incentive Credits and Parole Implications

SOP 214.02 (Performance Incentive Credit Program) creates a formal mechanism for inmates to affect their parole timeline through positive behavior and program participation. Under this SOP, eligible offenders can accumulate up to 12 months of credit off their length of stay through completion of educational and vocational programming, treatment programs, work details, and good behavior.

The PIC program results in a PIC Date — a date earlier than the TPM or MRD when the inmate may be considered for release. Positive performance "will result in favorable reports to the State Board of Pardons and Paroles." Unsatisfactory performance is addressed through the disciplinary process (cross-referenced to SOP 209.01).

A PIC Oversight Team, jointly approved by GDC leadership and the Parole Board, meets monthly to oversee program integrity. Parole Board representation on that team is mandatory under SOP 214.02. Notably, SOP 214.02 also cross-references SOP 220.07 directly, confirming the two SOPs work in tandem.

Classification's Role in Parole Preparation

SOP 220.03 (Classification Committee) requires that all offenders receive classification plans, classification status reviews, and pre-parole progress reports. The Next Generation Assessment (NGA) tool is used to identify programming needs. Classification committees evaluate security level, program needs, special needs (including ADA, mental health, medical, and educational needs), and custody level throughout incarceration.

The classification committee's recommendations feed directly into the Parole Review Summary required by SOP 220.07 — the warden/superintendent recommendation required by that SOP is a classification-level determination. SOP 220.03 explicitly lists SOP 215.01 (Transitional Center Selection) as a related procedure, reflecting the connection between classification decisions and Parole Board-directed placements.

Transitional Center Placement as a Parole Board Tool

SOP 215.01 (Transitional Center Selection Criteria and Process) recognizes Parole Board Referrals as a distinct category of transitional center placement. The Parole Board may periodically refer parolees to transitional centers for work release. Selection remains needs-driven, with factors including financial instability, residential instability, vocational/educational problems, and professional discretion.

Importantly, the Prison Classification Committee retains discretion to recommend denial or delay of a transitional center transfer "at any time, based upon poor performance, adjustment, medical or psychiatric developments, safety concerns, or other factors that would prevent successful participation." This means GDC can, as a policy matter, override or delay a Parole Board referral through its classification process — a potential area of conflict in practice.

For Seriously Violent Felony offenders (as defined by O.C.G.A. 17-10-6.1(a): murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, rape, aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual battery), transitional center placement is restricted to first-time conviction cases during the final year of incarceration. SOP 215.01 states these are the "ONLY Seriously Violent Offenders that GDC may refer to a Transitional Center program."

Boot Camp: Parole Board as Final Approval Authority

SOP 210.02 (Inmate Boot Camp – Classification and Assignment) places ultimate selection authority for the Inmate Boot Camp Program with the SBPP. GDC Inmate Administration screens incoming sentences for initial eligibility (sentence of 10 years or less, age 35 or younger, no violence in the sentence criteria), but the Parole Board conducts its own investigation and makes the final eligibility determination. The Parole Board has 15 working days from receipt of the sentence package to notify GDC of its decision in writing.

For parole violators who are revoked and meet boot camp criteria (except age limits), SBPP automatically approves boot camp participation. This automatic approval pathway is distinct from the general inmate process.

Parole Revocation Admissions to Detention Programs

SOP 212.04 (Screening/Referral/Admission, Whitworth Detention Center) governs how parolees are admitted to the Whitworth Detention Center following referral by the Parole Board. The Center Parole Officer receives referrals from Parole Board Central Office or field staff, reviews appropriateness, and schedules admissions — normally Tuesdays and Thursdays at 1:00 PM. The admission package should be received five working days before admission to allow for transportation coordination and case file setup. Required admission documents include a completed Parolee Intake Data Sheet, a Waiver/Request for Program Placement, health history forms, and a signed Pre-Admission Orientation Sheet.

SOP 212.03 (Determining Release Date, Whitworth) sets the standard program stay at 180 days (within a 150–210 day range). The Superintendent may adjust release dates within that range based on program participation, work performance, disciplinary record, and other factors. Any release or extension outside the 150–210 day range requires Parole Board approval. Releases are normally processed on Wednesdays.

Placement in Probation Detention Centers

SOP 213.02 (Detainee Screening, Sentencing, Pre-Admission, and Admission) addresses placement of parolees in Secure Alternative Centers. The Parole Board determines placement of parolees to Secure Alternative Centers when necessary and provides Offender Administration with the signed waiver, which is uploaded to SCRIBE. DCS officers assess suitability using target population criteria, and each center coordinates admissions through an automated referral portal.

SOP 213.01 (Mission & Military Regimen of Probation Detention Centers) confirms that parolees placed by the Parole Board are included in the detention center population alongside probationers sentenced by courts, all subject to the same military-style regimen.

Pre-Release Programming Linked to TPM/MRD

SOP 211.06 (In-House Transitional Center Dorms) targets inmates within 18 months of their Maximum Release Date or Tentative Parole Month for specialized pre-release programming. Eligible inmates are placed in designated housing units for delivery of reentry-focused programs. Inmates must have no more than 18 months and no less than 6 months remaining; placements beyond the 18-month criteria require ITC State Coordinator approval noted in SCRIBE. The TPM is thus a direct driver of ITC eligibility, creating a programmatic pipeline connected to parole timing.

What Policy Does Not Address

The SOPs in this corpus do not specify any GDC procedure for notifying inmates of upcoming parole review dates, beyond the requirement that the counselor complete the Parole Review Summary and enter a SCRIBE case note. There is no SOP provision for inmate participation in or input to the Parole Review Summary prior to its submission to the Board. The inmate's role in the process, as described in these SOPs, is limited to their program participation record and disciplinary history — both of which are assessed by staff, not submitted by the inmate directly.

Gaps & Conflicts

Where SOPs contradict each other, leave standards ambiguous, or fail to address something the broader policy framework would suggest they should.

  • SOP 220.07 requires the counselor to complete the Parole Review Summary and enter a SCRIBE case note, but no SOP in this corpus requires staff to notify the inmate that a parole review is occurring, provide the inmate an opportunity to submit input, or inform the inmate of the completed summary's contents before it is forwarded to the Parole Board.
  • SOP 215.01 grants the Prison Classification Committee discretion to deny or delay a Parole Board transitional center referral at any time for a broad range of reasons, but does not specify any procedural requirement for the Committee to notify the Parole Board of such a denial or delay, creating a potential gap in Board oversight of GDC placement decisions.
  • SOP 220.07 states that inmates must receive a 'positive recommendation' from the Warden or Superintendent, but does not specify any procedure for what happens when the counselor's recommendation and the Warden's recommendation conflict, or what standard the Warden must use.
  • No SOP in this corpus specifies what recourse, if any, an inmate has if the facility fails to submit the Parole Review Summary within the 30-day window required by SOP 220.07, or if a delay causes the inmate to miss an advance release opportunity.
  • SOP 214.02 states that 'the Parole Board may reconsider and change a prior decision in a case, for any reason, at any time, up to the time of release,' but no SOP specifies how or whether an inmate is notified of such a reconsideration or given any opportunity to respond.
  • The SOPs are silent on whether an inmate's classification level at the time of the Parole Review Summary can be changed by the facility between submission and the Board's 120-day review window in a way that would affect the prior recommendation — SOP 220.07 does not address this scenario.

SOPs Cited in This Page

Report a Problem