GDC Policy LibraryTopics

Policy Synthesis

Visitation Rules and Procedures

Synthesized from 30 SOPs  ·  22 directly cited  ·  updated May 2, 2026

Georgia Department of Corrections policy establishes visitation as a privilege — not a right — for all offenders, governed primarily by SOP 227.05 and Board Rule 125-3-4-.01. The rules address who may visit, how visitors are approved and managed, scheduling requirements, attorney and clergy visits, contact conduct, special circumstances, and the circumstances under which visitation may be suspended or revoked.

Visitation as a Privilege, Not a Right

GDC policy is unambiguous on the foundational question: visitation is a privilege, not a right. Board Rule 125-3-4-.01 states directly that "visiting is an inmate privilege not a right. As such, some or all of an inmate's visiting privileges may be suspended or revoked as a disciplinary measure; because the rules governing visiting are violated; or when the security of the institution so requires." SOP 227.05 echoes this framing in its introduction: "Visitation is a privilege for offenders and should not be considered a right."

Who May Visit: Visitor Categories

SOP 227.05 defines three categories of approved visitors:

  • Immediate Family — parents, siblings, spouse, grandparents, grandchildren, children, "or other persons with the discretion of the Warden."
  • Extended Family — step-parents, step-siblings, step-children, brothers- and sisters-in-law, uncles, aunts, cousins, half-siblings, nephews, and nieces.
  • Significant Relationship Visitors — persons "having a meaningful relationship with the offender to provide support and encouragement in a rehabilitative capacity," including friends, employers, and pastors. The policy explicitly limits this category to two (2) visitors at any given time and states that "the term Significant Relationship does NOT imply automatic approval for visitation because of romantic involvement. Rehabilitative potential must still be established."

An offender's approved visitor list is capped at twelve (12) total visitors across all categories. SOP 204.10 (GOAL Device / JPay Kiosk) confirms this twelve-person cap and adds that electronic mail, video grams, and video visitation through the JPay system are also restricted to persons on the approved visitation list.

For transitional centers, SOP 215.06 (IID03-0003) sets the same twelve-person cap for the approved visitor list, while noting that residents with large families "will be considered on an individual basis."

Visitor Approval Process

Board Rule 125-3-4-.02 requires that each new inmate be interviewed upon arrival at their first permanent assignment to identify proposed visitors by name, address, and relationship. The Warden may disapprove any proposed visitor if that person "would constitute a threat to the institutional security or would undermine the rehabilitation or discipline of the inmate." A copy of the approved list is provided to the inmate as soon as practicable.

SOP 227.05 references a Facility/Center Visitation List (Attachment 5), which must be completed for GOAL Device access as well (per SOP 204.10). Subsequent additions or deletions are requested through the offender's counselor, who forwards the request to the Warden or Superintendent for approval.

The Superintendent of a transitional center may, at their discretion, require prospective visitors to sign a GCIC/NCIC Consent Form (SOP 215.06, Attachment 3) authorizing a criminal and driver history background check before approval.

When an offender transfers to another facility, their previously approved visitation list transfers with them and "shall be honored unless extenuating circumstances come to light that would threaten the security and orderly operating of the receiving facility" (SOP 204.10; see also Board Rule 125-3-4-.02).

Visitor Identification and Sign-In Requirements

Board Rule 125-3-4-.06 requires correctional officers to determine the identity of each visitor and verify identity by "examining his personal credentials" before confirming their name appears on the authorized visitor list (or that prior Warden approval exists for a special visit). All visitors must sign in and out on a visitor's register, which is dated, countersigned by the officer in charge, and retained on file. Each page of the register must carry a statutory warning that furnishing weapons, liquor, drugs, or contraband to an offender is a felony punishable by one to five years imprisonment.

Inmates must inform their visitors that giving a false name when signing the register is a criminal offense (Board Rule 125-3-4-.06).

All visitors must wear "appropriate attire to be determined by the Georgia Department of Corrections" (Board Rule 125-3-4-.06). SOP 229.01 separately prohibits all visitors from possessing or using tobacco products or tobacco-related items (including electronic cigarettes) anywhere on facility grounds.

Visiting Hours and Schedule

Board Rule 125-3-4-.05 sets the minimum visiting schedule: at least four hours of visitation on Saturdays, Sundays, and days proclaimed by the Governor as legal holidays. The Commissioner may authorize the Warden/Superintendent to modify visiting days and hours at specific institutions based on special circumstances (e.g., small inmate population, high privilege usage, infirm inmates). Any changes to visiting schedules must be published to the inmate population.

By contrast, transitional centers operate under a lower minimum: SOP 215.06 requires "a minimum of two hours visiting time (preferably, four hours)" on Saturdays, Sundays, and observed state holidays. The Superintendent may expand hours if they do not interfere with center operations.

A visiting schedule must be "posted permanently and conspicuously" at transitional centers (SOP 215.06).

Out-of-state or long-distance visitors may be permitted by the Warden to visit at times outside normal visiting hours (Board Rule 125-3-4-.05). Special visiting privileges for such visits must be requested by the inmate prior to the expected visit date.

Diagnostic inmates face a stricter rule: Board Rule 125-3-4-.05 prohibits visitation privileges during the first six weeks of assignment to a designated diagnostic program. After six weeks, visitation may be permitted with Superintendent approval.

Supervision of Visits and Conduct

Board Rule 125-3-4-.06 requires all visits to be supervised by correctional officers "who shall be held responsible for assuring the maintenance of good order." Officers in visiting areas must maintain "particular vigilance in preventing contraband from entering the institution."

An officer in charge of a visiting area must exclude any visitor who is under — or reasonably appears to be under — the influence of any intoxicant (alcohol or drug). Officers shall also exclude any visitor who "creates a disturbance whether by fighting, unruly behavior, behavior which seriously infringes on the rights of other visitors, or acts prejudicial to the operation of the institution" (Board Rule 125-3-4-.06).

Visitors may be searched prior to being permitted visiting privileges (Board Rule 125-3-4-.06).

In the event of an institutional emergency, Board Rule 125-3-4-.09 authorizes barring all visitors from the institution.

Restrictions on Visitors with Sexual Offense Convictions

Multiple overlapping SOPs and rules address visitors where the offender has a current or prior conviction for a sexual offense: SOP 227.05, Board Rule 125-3-4-.02, SOP 222.09, SOP 215.06, and SOP 213.04 all carry substantially identical language.

The rule: an offender with a sexual offense conviction shall not be allowed visitation with any person under age 18 unless that person is the offender's spouse, son, daughter, brother, sister, grandson, or granddaughter — and that person is not the victim of a sexual offense for which the offender was convicted.

If visitation with a minor is restricted by court order, "permission for special visitation with the minor may be granted only by the court issuing such order" (Board Rule 125-3-4-.02; SOP 222.09; SOP 213.04).

Attorney Visits

Board Rule 125-3-4-.07 provides distinct and stronger protections for attorney visits. Attorneys — defined to include "an inmate's attorney of record or another attorney licensed to practice in State or United States Courts, Court of Appeals, or the Supreme Courts with whom the inmate has or is attempting to establish an attorney-client relationship" — shall be permitted to visit during prescribed visiting periods. Beyond that, "reasonable flexibility shall be exercised" in permitting attorneys to visit during normal business hours by prior appointment, and in special circumstances during non-business hours. Appointments outside normal visiting hours require 24-hour advance notice except in "bona fide emergencies."

Privacy is explicitly protected: the officer supervising an attorney visit "shall so position himself as to permit the attorney and his client to converse privately and maintain the privileged nature of their relationship."

Board Rule 125-3-4-.07 also permits para-legals, investigators, or law assistants to visit by prior arrangement with the Warden, provided the attorney contacts the Warden in advance and the visitor presents a letter signed by the attorney dated no more than one week prior to the visit.

Critically, Board Rule 125-3-4-.05 states that the general visitation privilege may be revoked or suspended as a disciplinary measure — but expressly exempts attorney-client visits from that suspension authority.

Clergy and Volunteer Visits

Visiting clergy are governed by Board Rule 125-4-7-.03, which requires Warden/Superintendent concurrence and clearly defined parameters for the visit. Religious literature proposed for distribution must be submitted to the institution in advance. Visiting clergy are subject to all GDC rules and regulations.

SOP 106.01 (Chaplaincy Program) confirms that "offenders may have special visits with clergy per SOP 227.05." Clergy visits occur "through established visiting procedures."

Volunteer visitors are managed under SOP 109.01. Certified volunteers must complete background checks, PREA training, and certification before being approved. A "visiting volunteer" — a one-time, non-recurring visitor authorized by the Warden for a single day — must execute a Visiting Volunteer Waiver of Liability.

Compassionate Visits

SOP 222.09 governs temporary release for funeral attendance or visits to critically ill immediate family members. Under Board Rule 125-2-4-.15, such programs exist at the Commissioner's discretion via SOP. The offender must be released into the custody of a sheriff, deputy sheriff, or designated correctional officer. Offenders under a death sentence are excluded from this program. Sex offenders convicted of qualifying offenses face the same minor-visitation restrictions described above. Visits for sex offenders, murderers, and out-of-state reprieves require approval from the State Board of Pardons and Parole.

Common-Law Marriage and Visitation

SOP 220.06 establishes a specific process for offenders who claim a common-law marriage (which must have been established before January 1, 1997, under Georgia law). During the diagnostic phase, the offender and the claimed spouse each sign notarized affidavits. Once both notarized affidavits are received, the common-law spouse is added to the offender's visitation list per SOP 227.05. An offender cannot claim both a common-law marriage and a conventional marriage simultaneously.

Removal of Visitors and Suspension of Privileges

Board Rule 125-3-4-.02 allows removal of an approved visitor for "creating a disturbance, fighting, unruly behavior, behavior which seriously infringes on the rights of other visitors, or acts prejudicial to the operation of the institution."

Board Rule 125-3-4-.03 requires institutions to notify both the removed visitor and the inmate in writing when a name is removed from the authorized visitor list, along with the reason. When an inmate loses visitation privileges for a period exceeding two weeks, the institution must provide the inmate with a form letter to notify potential visitors "so that potential visitors may avoid the inconvenience and frustrations associated with an unproductive trip."

Board Rule 125-3-4-.05 confirms that the visitation privilege may be revoked or suspended in whole or in part as a disciplinary measure, and points to Board Rule Chapter 125-3-2 for authorized disciplinary circumstances. Board Rule 125-3-4-.01 additionally gives Wardens authority to "modify or limit the visiting privileges if it appears that the institution cannot accommodate the quantity of visitors entering the institution."

Visitation Area Requirements

Board Rule 125-3-4-.04 requires each correctional institution to maintain a visiting area for authorized visitors, with toilet facilities available for visitors.

Video and Electronic Visitation

SOP 204.10 establishes video visitation through the JPay Kiosk system as a 30-minute electronic interactive visit between an offender and a person on the offender's approved visitation list. Video grams are 30-second messages. Both are restricted to persons already on the approved twelve-person visitation list. All communications through GOAL Devices and Kiosks "are subject to inspection and review for security reasons, and neither the sender, nor receiver, has an expectation of privacy."

Packages and Letters During Visits

Board Rule 125-3-4-.10 addresses items passed to visitors during visits: an inmate may pre-arrange with the mail room to have items or letters given to specific visitors during visits, provided those items would be acceptable for mailing. Privileged mail may only be given to the addressee or their official representative. Such packages must be processed through the mail room, inspected, and delivered by an institutional employee — they cannot return to the inmate's control.

Other (Non-Family) Visitors and Groups

Board Rule 125-3-4-.08 gives Wardens discretionary authority to authorize individuals or groups — such as civic groups, church committees, and students — to visit the institution, establishing procedures as required. News media access is separately governed by Board Rule 125-1-2-.09(a) and is not covered by the general visitation rules.

SOP 205.17 governs public access for free-speech and organizational activities, requiring 24-hour written notice, Regional Director approval, and confining activity to areas outside the secured fence.

Key Findings

  • Visitation is explicitly defined as a privilege, not a right, by both Board Rule 125-3-4-.01 and SOP 227.05, and may be revoked or suspended as a disciplinary measure, for rule violations, or on security grounds.
  • An offender's approved visitor list is capped at twelve (12) persons total across all categories, and Significant Relationship Visitors are further limited to only two (2) at any time under SOP 227.05.
  • Board Rule 125-3-4-.05 requires a minimum of four hours of visitation on Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays at correctional institutions, while SOP 215.06 sets a lower two-hour minimum for transitional centers.
  • Diagnostic inmates are prohibited from all visitation for the first six weeks of their assignment to a designated diagnostic program under Board Rule 125-3-4-.05.
  • Attorney-client visits receive explicit protections under Board Rule 125-3-4-.07, including reasonable flexibility for business-hours visits by appointment, a requirement for officer positioning that preserves attorney-client privilege, and an express exemption from disciplinary visitation suspension under Board Rule 125-3-4-.05.
  • Offenders with current or prior sexual offense convictions are prohibited from visiting with anyone under age 18 unless that minor is the offender's spouse, child, sibling, grandchild, and is not a victim of the offender's conviction — a rule repeated across at least five SOPs and Board Rules (SOP 227.05, Board Rule 125-3-4-.02, SOP 222.09, SOP 215.06, SOP 213.04).
  • When an inmate loses visitation privileges for more than two weeks, Board Rule 125-3-4-.03 requires the institution to provide the inmate with a form letter to notify potential visitors, and requires written notice to any visitor whose name is removed from the authorized visitor list.
  • All video visitation and electronic messaging through the JPay/GOAL system under SOP 204.10 is restricted to persons on the approved visitation list and is subject to inspection with no expectation of privacy.
  • SOP 220.06 establishes a specific process for validating common-law marriages (established before January 1, 1997) for visitation purposes, requiring notarized affidavits from both parties during the diagnostic phase.
  • Visitors may be barred from institutions during emergencies under Board Rule 125-3-4-.09, and the Warden may limit visitor volume if the institution cannot accommodate the quantity of visitors under Board Rule 125-3-4-.01.

Gaps & Conflicts

Where SOPs contradict each other, leave standards ambiguous, or fail to address something the broader policy framework would suggest they should.

  • Minimum visiting hours conflict between facility types: Board Rule 125-3-4-.05 sets a four-hour minimum at correctional institutions, while SOP 215.06 sets a two-hour minimum (with four hours described as preferable) at transitional centers. Neither SOP 227.05 nor any cross-referencing SOP reconciles this disparity or addresses whether it is intentional.
  • The attorney visit rule (Board Rule 125-3-4-.07) states attorneys 'shall be permitted' to visit during prescribed periods and that 'reasonable flexibility shall be exercised' for business-hours appointments — but neither this rule nor SOP 227.05 defines what constitutes 'reasonable flexibility' or establishes an enforceable maximum wait time for attorney visit requests.
  • Board Rule 125-3-4-.01 allows the Warden to 'modify or limit visiting privileges if it appears that the institution cannot accommodate the quantity of visitors,' without specifying what procedural safeguards apply, how inmates or visitors are notified, or how long such limits may remain in place.
  • SOP 227.05 defines 'Immediate Family' to include 'other persons with the discretion of the Warden,' making the outer boundary of this category undefined and subject to unguided discretion at the facility level.
  • The SOPs do not address whether or how an offender may appeal or challenge a Warden's decision to deny or remove a proposed visitor from the approved list. Board Rule 125-3-4-.02 requires only that the inmate be notified — it does not provide a grievance or appeal pathway specific to visitor denials.
  • SOP 215.06 (Transitional Centers) restricts visitation between residents convicted of sexual offenses and minors 'unless they are direct family,' but uses slightly different language than Board Rule 125-3-4-.02 and SOP 227.05, which specify a more precise list (spouse, son, daughter, brother, sister, grandson, granddaughter). The term 'direct family' in SOP 215.06 may be broader or narrower in practice.
  • The SOPs do not specify whether non-contact or contact visitation is the default at any particular facility type, nor do they set any system-wide standards for when non-contact visits may be imposed on specific offenders.
  • Board Rule 125-3-4-.08 gives Wardens broad and unreviewable discretion to authorize or deny visits by civic groups, clergy committees, and students, with no minimum standards or notice requirements specified.

SOPs Cited in This Page

SOP 213.04: Detainee Orientation and Handbook Facilities Division (Detention Centers)
SOP 215.11: Resident Rules and Regulations Facilities Division (Transitional Centers)
SOP 106.01: Purposes (Chaplaincy Program) Inmate Services Division (Chaplaincy Services)
SOP 125-3-4-.01: General Board of Corrections
SOP 125-3-4-.07: Attorneys Board of Corrections
SOP 109.01: Local Management of Volunteer Services Inmate Services Division (Chaplaincy)
Report a Problem