Executive Summary
Georgia’s prison classification system — the process that determines where incarcerated people are housed based on risk — has collapsed under chronic understaffing and bed-space-driven decisions that override safety assessments. The U.S. Department of Justice characterized Georgia’s violations as “among the most severe” uncovered in any DOJ prison investigation. The consequences are measured in lives lost and dollars wasted.
- 142 people were killed in Georgia prisons between 2018 and 2023. Homicides increased five-fold, from 7 in 2018 to 35 in 2023.
- Correctional officer staffing has fallen to 50% of full levels even as the prison census has doubled since 1990. Some facilities exceed 60% vacancy rates.
- Close-security individuals are housed in medium-security facilities not designed or staffed for that population, while the state simultaneously overclassifies low-risk people into unnecessarily expensive high-security settings.
- GDC systematically underreports violence: the agency reported 6 homicides for the first 5 months of 2024 in mortality data, but at least 18 deaths were categorized as homicides in incident reports.
- Comparable state data shows overclassification alone cost New Mexico up to $28 million per year — a figure that likely understates Georgia’s fiscal exposure given its larger system.
Key Takeaway: Georgia’s classification system has broken down, directly contributing to a five-fold increase in prison homicides while wasting taxpayer money on misallocated housing placements.
Fiscal Impact
The Cost of Getting Classification Wrong
Federal Bureau of Prisons data demonstrates the steep cost gradient across security levels:
| Security Level | Annual Per Capita Cost |
|---|---|
| Minimum security | $21,006 |
| Low security | $25,378 |
| Medium security | $26,247 |
| High security | $33,930 |
| Community supervision (probation) | $3,433 |
Every person overclassified from minimum to high security costs taxpayers an additional $12,924 per year — a 61% premium for no safety benefit. Community supervision costs roughly one-tenth of minimum-security incarceration.
Lessons from New Mexico
New Mexico’s Legislative Finance Committee found that overclassification deviations from the scoring tool cost the state up to $28 million per year. The pattern is instructive: while 60% of new inmates from 2014–2016 scored at minimum security, only 29% were actually housed there. State-level security cost differentials ranged from $11,183 per person annually in minimum-security units to $37,585 in maximum-security units — a 236% increase.
Georgia’s Double Fiscal Failure
Georgia’s classification breakdown creates a two-directional fiscal drain: the state pays higher per-person costs for people overclassified into unnecessary high security, while simultaneously failing to invest in adequate staffing and infrastructure at facilities that house underclassified high-risk individuals. The result is maximum expenditure with minimum safety — the worst possible return on taxpayer investment.
Georgia operates 7 close-security prisons and 14 medium-security prisons. GPS data analysis has identified that medium-security prisons house close-security individuals at rates far above what would be expected. Every misplaced person represents both a safety risk and a misallocated dollar.
Key Takeaway: Misclassification wastes money in both directions: overclassification cost New Mexico $28 million annually, while underclassification creates violence that generates litigation, medical costs, and federal intervention.
Key Findings
1. The DOJ Found Georgia Has Lost Control of Its Prisons
The DOJ’s October 2024 findings report determined that “the leadership of the Georgia Department of Corrections has lost control of its facilities,” with “near-constant life-threatening violence.” The investigation identified classification and housing as a critical systemic failure contributing to this violence.
The DOJ explicitly recommended that GDC “reevaluate the housing and inmate classification process” as one of its minimum remedial measures.
2. Five-Fold Increase in Homicides
142 people were killed in Georgia prisons between 2018 and 2023. The trajectory is stark:
– 2018: 7 homicides
– 2023: 35 homicides
– In one month alone in 2023, 5 people were killed at 4 different prisons
This is not isolated violence — it is system-wide failure.
3. Staffing Collapse Makes Classification Meaningless
The state prison census has doubled since 1990 while correctional officer staffing has fallen to only 50% of full levels. Some prisons have staffing vacancy rates exceeding 60%. At one close-security prison, a single officer was responsible for tracking 400 beds.
The DOJ found a clear causal chain: chronic understaffing leaves officers unable to conduct basic daily counts or maintain supervision. Gangs fill the vacuum, controlling housing units. Incarcerated people can unlock their own cells and wander at will. Classification becomes meaningless when there is no staff to enforce security boundaries.
DOJ investigators emphasized that GDC places too much blame on gangs and insufficient emphasis on understaffing as the primary driver of disorder.
4. Bed Space Drives Decisions — Not Risk Assessment
The DOJ found that classification decisions appear driven by bed availability rather than risk assessment. Close-security individuals — defined as escape risks with assault histories who are deemed dangerous — are being housed in medium-security facilities not designed or staffed for that population.
GPS data analysis confirms this pattern: medium-security prisons in Georgia house close-security individuals at rates far above what would be expected.
5. Systematic Underreporting Obscures the Crisis
GDC reported only 6 homicides for the first 5 months of 2024 in mortality data. But the DOJ found that at least 18 deaths were categorized as homicides in incident reports — three times the official figure. Violent incidents are consistently underreported due to lack of supervision and mischaracterized using inappropriate incident-type categories.
This underreporting prevents accountability and delays reform.
6. LGBTI Individuals Face Heightened Danger
The DOJ found that GDC does not adequately screen, classify, or track LGBTI individuals to ensure their safety. Transgender women are often housed with male inmates and face heightened assault risk due to inadequate classification protocols — a direct violation of PREA (Prison Rape Elimination Act) standards.
7. Women Are Systematically Overclassified
Research consistently shows that custody classification systems tend to overclassify women into higher risk categories than warranted by their behavior, increasing limitations on their freedoms and access to programming. Classification tools work better for male offenders than female offenders, creating a gender-based disparity in Georgia’s system.
8. One Facility Shows What’s Possible
Walker State Prison — a smaller facility with a higher proportion of staff positions filled — was a notable exception, with fewer incarcerated people reporting fear. This demonstrates that adequate staffing directly correlates with reduced violence and effective classification enforcement.
Key Takeaway: The DOJ found Georgia’s prison violations are ‘among the most severe’ ever investigated, driven by a classification system where bed availability overrides risk assessment and staffing has collapsed to 50% of required levels.
Comparable States
New Mexico: A Cautionary Parallel
New Mexico’s classification failure provides a direct cautionary example for Georgia. In 1999, a guard was murdered at the medium-security Santa Rosa prison — minutes after an incarcerated person was stabbed elsewhere in the facility. An independent review found that the state had inappropriately placed individuals with violent histories and dangerous gang affiliations in the medium-security prison.
The classification system produced errors resulting in both inappropriately low and unnecessarily high classifications, with decisions too frequently driven by available bed space rather than security risk — the same pattern the DOJ identified in Georgia.
New Mexico’s classification crisis has deep roots: after the deadly 1980 PNM prison riot that killed 33 people, the state was required under a federal consent decree to implement a formal classification system, which it had lacked entirely.
By 2014–2016, the system remained dysfunctional: 60% of new admissions scored at minimum security, but only 29% were actually housed there. The overclassification cost taxpayers up to $28 million per year.
New Mexico’s security cost differentials (FY2019):
– Minimum-security units: $11,183 per person annually
– Level III/IV (medium/high) units: $27,668 per person annually
– Maximum-security units: $37,585 per person annually
California: Overcrowding and Violence
Research on 14 California state prisons (2018 and 2022) found that populations exceeding original design capacity were associated with increased violence — both person-on-person and person-on-officer assaults. Overcrowding affects incarcerated people and correctional staff equally.
New Zealand: Who Commits Violence
A study of New Zealand prisons (2016–2020) found that individuals who assaulted staff were more likely to be younger, gang-affiliated, and had higher security classifications. Perpetrators of serious violence tended to already be segregated from the general population — suggesting that classification alone, without adequate staffing and supervision, is insufficient.
Federal Standards
The Nelson Mandela Rules (UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners) call for using the lowest security category consistent with safety and control requirements — a principle Georgia’s bed-space-driven system routinely violates in both directions.
Key Takeaway: New Mexico’s nearly identical classification failures cost $28 million annually and contributed to multiple deaths, offering Georgia a clear warning of the fiscal and human costs of inaction.
Policy Recommendations
Based on DOJ findings, academic research, and comparable state experience, the following evidence-based reforms address Georgia’s classification failures:
1. Mandate Independent Validation of the NGA Classification Instrument
Require an independent, external validation study of Georgia’s Next Generation Assessment (NGA) tool using Georgia-specific data. Currently, approximately 100–125 individuals arrive per day for classification through the 7–15 working day diagnostic process, but there is no evidence the tool has been validated for predicting institutional violence specifically. Few states have validated their classification instruments for this purpose.
2. Prohibit Bed-Space-Driven Classification Overrides
Enact legislation barring classification placement decisions based on bed availability rather than validated risk assessment. The DOJ found that classification decisions appear driven by bed availability rather than risk assessment. Require documented justification for any override of the NGA-generated security level, with quarterly reporting to the General Assembly.
3. Require Regular Classification Audits with Public Reporting
Mandate annual independent audits comparing classification scores to actual housing placements, with results reported publicly. GPS analysis has identified systematic mismatches between classification levels and housing assignments. Transparency requirements should include data on overrides, mismatches, and outcomes.
4. Establish LGBTI-Specific Classification Protocols
Require GDC to implement screening and housing protocols that comply with PREA standards (28 C.F.R. Part 115) for LGBTI individuals. The DOJ found GDC does not adequately screen, classify, or track LGBTI individuals to ensure their safety.
5. Develop Gender-Responsive Classification Tools
Fund and require development of classification instruments validated specifically for women. Research demonstrates that current tools overclassify women into higher risk categories than warranted by their behavior.
6. Address the Staffing Crisis as a Classification Prerequisite
Classification reform without staffing reform is meaningless. With correctional officer staffing at 50% of full levels and some prisons exceeding 60% vacancy rates, there is no capacity to enforce classification boundaries. Legislation should tie classification reform to enforceable minimum staffing ratios.
7. Mandate Reclassification Reviews at Regular Intervals
Require documented reclassification reviews at defined intervals, recognizing that long-term and older individuals often require minimal internal security regardless of offense history. Reclassification should be tied to behavior and risk — not bed space.
8. Establish Independent Oversight of the Classification Process
Create an independent oversight body with authority to review classification decisions, investigate mismatches, and recommend corrective action. This body should report directly to the General Assembly, not to GDC.
9. Reform Violence Reporting Standards
Address the systematic underreporting identified by the DOJ — where GDC reported 6 homicides in mortality data while at least 18 deaths were categorized as homicides in incident reports. Mandate standardized, auditable incident reporting with independent verification.
Key Takeaway: Nine specific, evidence-based legislative actions can reform Georgia’s classification system, starting with independent validation of the NGA tool and prohibition of bed-space-driven overrides.
Read the Source Document
Other Versions
- Public Version — A plain-language summary for families, advocates, and community members
- Media Version — Press-ready briefing with key data points and source citations