METRO REINVESTMENT CENTER
Facility Information
- Current Population
- 441
- Address
- 1301 Constitution Road, Atlanta, GA 30316
- Phone
- (404) 443-3373
- County
- DeKalb County
- Operator
- GDC (Georgia Dept. of Corrections)
Security Classification
Last updated: October 22, 2025
35 of the 457 people held here are classified Close security (7.7%), undated table, produced October 22, 2025.
| Security level | People | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Close | 35 | 7.7% |
| Medium | 291 | 63.7% |
| Minimum | 131 | 28.7% |
| Total | 457 |
Source: Georgia Department of Corrections records produced to GPS under the Open Records Act (R024615-101925). A person's security level is GDC's classification of that person, which can differ from the prison's own designation.
Follow Metro Reinvestment Center
Leadership & Accountability (as of 2026 records)
Officials currently holding positional authority at this facility, with deaths attributed to GPS-tracked records during their leadership tenure. Inclusion reflects role-based accountability, not legal findings of personal culpability. Death counts shown as facility / career.
| Role | Name | Since | Deaths this facility / career |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT (facility lead) | Parham, Cynthia L | 2022-01-01 | 1 / 1 |
| Assistant Superintendent (facility deputy) | Wince, Nicholas A | 2026-04-16 | 1 / 1 |
About
Last updated October 25, 2026.(DS)
Metro Reintegration Center: A Transitional Facility Under the Same Pressures as the Prisons
Metro Reintegration Center sits in Atlanta, in DeKalb County — a GDC transitional facility holding 441 men at close security, led by Correctional Superintendent Cynthia L. Parham since January 2022, with Nicholas A. Wince serving as assistant superintendent since April 2026. On paper, a reintegration center is where a sentence narrows toward release: work assignments, savings, a job waiting on the outside. The record GPS has assembled for this facility tells a different and more complicated story — one in which the same structural forces GPS has documented across Georgia's prison system, staffing collapse and the drift of security classifications, reach all the way into the transitional tier. This page examines what GPS's records and the accounts of families describe at Metro, and places those accounts against the systemwide findings that give them context.
What the Facility Is
Metro is one of GDC's transitional centers, a close-security facility for men in Atlanta. GPS's facility record lists its population at 441 and identifies Parham as correctional superintendent and Wince as assistant superintendent. The public profile GPS holds for the facility is thin — its descriptive field is essentially empty — and that sparseness is itself worth noting: transitional centers receive far less public scrutiny than the state prisons, even though the people held in them are in the final stretch before release, when a disruption in medical care, safety, or earned privileges carries direct consequences for whether someone leaves with a job and a place to live or leaves with nothing.
Family accounts collected by GPS describe the facility's population in motion — people transferred in from other institutions, people working maintenance details, people trying to save money before their release date. That is the ordinary business of a reintegration center. What follows is what families say happened when the ordinary business broke down.
A 2025 Assault, a Refused Transfer, and the Question of Medical Response
The most serious cluster of accounts GPS holds concerns an assault in 2025. Family members describe an incarcerated person at Metro being picked up upside down by the head and neck, his head struck against the floor repeatedly, thrown into a metal bed and into a wall, and knocked unconscious — left on the floor, and unable to get up after he regained consciousness. The same accounts describe blood running down his head and face, significant head injuries, bruises across his body, and substantial weight loss afterward. He called his mother shortly after the assault, according to these accounts, and told her he did not feel well.
What families say happened next is the part that turns an assault into an allegation about the facility itself. A family member reports asking that he be sent to the hospital, and reports that an assistant superintendent refused. The accounts describe him unable to walk, bedridden for two to three days, and not checked on by staff during that time. They describe no pain medication. And they describe a supervisor later calling him into a conference room with the person identified as his attacker present, and a staff member telling him to forgive the other incarcerated person for the assault.
GPS has received accounts of a serious assault and of medical care being refused at Metro Reintegration Center. These are family attestations; GPS has not independently corroborated the specific sequence, and they are presented here as accounts, not as established findings. A separate tip GPS received describes an assault at the facility in 2025 with head injuries, denied medical care, and staff retaliation after grievances were filed. Read together, the accounts point at a single question that matters more than any one detail: whether a person injured at a transitional center can get a hospital transfer when a family member asks for one, and what happens to him if he complains when he cannot.
Retaliation, Grievances, and the Machinery of Compliance
The retaliation thread runs through the accounts independently of the assault. Families describe a counselor who was disrespectful and, in other tellings, hateful toward an incarcerated person; an assistant superintendent described as hateful; and incentive points — the currency of a transitional center, the thing that governs whether someone keeps a work detail and moves toward release — repeatedly removed. One account describes an incarcerated person who may be related to an assistant superintendent, and another describes a person serving a life sentence who may have directed another incarcerated person to carry out an assault. GPS presents those as family suspicions, not findings.
Money is a recurring theme. Families report that staff delayed delivering money orders for several months, that staff held an incarcerated person's money orders for roughly three months, and that people at the facility alleged staff took their money and checks. These are the kinds of allegations that are hard to prove from the outside and easy to dismiss — until you consider that a person weeks from release is depending on that money to pay a first month's rent.
GPS's own reporting has documented, in the Tell My Story account "An Email Trail as the Day Is Long," a family's description of the retaliation machinery as it operates from the inside: grievances filed by an incarcerated person and by his fiancée, followed by what she describes as false disciplinary reports, and a doctor who first threatened to take away medication and then did, and then sought a signature making the deprivation look like the patient's own choice. That account is not about Metro, and GPS does not attach it to this facility. It is cited here because it describes the same mechanism families at Metro describe — the grievance, the counter-charge, the paper that reframes a deprivation as a refusal — and because it shows how consistently that mechanism is reported across Georgia's institutions.
Classification Drift and Staffing Collapse Reach the Transitional Tier
Metro is classified close security, and that classification is the thread that ties this facility to GPS's systemwide findings. GPS has documented a pattern of classification drift across Georgia's prisons: facilities operating at higher security levels than their designation implies, holding close-security populations without the staffing and infrastructure that designation requires. GPS's October 2025 analysis, "The Classification Crisis: How Four Medium Security Prisons Are Killing People," documented the pattern at four medium-security prisons. That report does not name Metro, and this page does not claim it does. But the underlying structural facts GPS has documented apply to the system as a whole, and they bear directly on a 441-person close-security transitional center in Atlanta.
Officer vacancies in Georgia's prisons have run between 49.3% and 60% systemwide for multiple years, against a national standard of no more than 10%. The hiring pipeline cannot close the gap: acceptance rates under 15%, and 82.7% of new hires leaving in their first year. Georgia ranks last of 50 states for correctional-officer pay. The October 2024 DOJ findings letter concluded that "the leadership of the Georgia Department of Corrections has lost control of its facilities" and faulted GDC for placing "too much blame on gangs and insufficient emphasis on understaffing." Tyler Ryals, a former GDC sergeant forced out in 2024 after whistleblowing, told GPS he had personally been the only security person on an entire Telfair compound of roughly 1,250 maximum-security inmates. GPS treats staffing collapse and the gang assumption of facility control as the integrated structural finding that explains the per-facility violence, classification, and mortality narratives across the system.
That is the context in which a family's account of a man knocked unconscious and left on the floor for two to three days without a staff check becomes legible — not as an isolated failure of one supervisor, but as what understaffing looks like at the level of a single bunk.
Infrastructure, Food, and the Conditions Behind the Accounts
GPS has documented that most GDC facilities are 30 to 40-plus years old, with patterns of deferred maintenance producing systemwide infrastructure failures: broken cell-door locks, inoperative surveillance and fire-alarm systems, mold and water failures, broken kitchen sanitization equipment, and pest infestations. The DOJ's October 2024 findings, the Guidehouse 2024 assessment, and Commissioner Oliver's public "end of life" statements all corroborate the pattern. GPS treats infrastructure collapse as a force multiplier for the violence, classification, and mortality crises documented at the facility level.
The food system is part of the same picture. GDC spends approximately $1.69 per person per day on food, with $1.60 per day proposed for FY27 — under 60 cents per meal — against the FDA Thrifty Food Plan estimate of roughly $10 per day for an adult man's nutritionally adequate diet. The state spends roughly 14 times more on medical care for incarcerated people ($432 million) than on their food. The Marshall Project independently corroborated the pattern in its May 16, 2026 investigation "Rats, Insects and Mold," reporting rats in kitchens, insects in food, moldy trays, and visible malnutrition across Georgia facilities. GPS has separately documented that DPH kitchen inspection scores systematically fail to capture sanitation failure — broken tray-sanitizing dishwashers, sustained roach and rodent infestation, meals served on contaminated trays — because inspections are scheduled walkthroughs that do not assess equipment under load. None of that reporting is specific to Metro. It describes the system Metro belongs to.
A Death in the Registry
GPS's mortality registry records one death at Metro Reintegration Center since 2020. David Rackley Pritchett died August 29, 2026, at Metro Reintegration Center, at age 66. GPS's registry lists the cause as Unknown/Pending — meaning GPS does not yet know the cause, and this page does not guess at one. Across the system, GPS has independently tracked 1,918 deaths in GDC custody since 2020, a figure that is always a floor because GDC reports deaths roughly two months late.
What the Record Supports
Metro Reintegration Center is a small facility in a system with large problems, and the honest summary of this page is that the two are connected by structure rather than by any single documented incident. The family accounts GPS holds describe a 2025 assault, a refused hospital transfer, days without a staff check, and retaliation after grievances — serious allegations that GPS has received but has not independently corroborated. The systemwide record GPS has documented — vacancy rates near 50 to 60 percent, a hiring pipeline that cannot close the gap, classification drift that puts close-security populations in facilities without the staffing their designation assumes, and infrastructure and food systems in sustained failure — supplies the conditions in which such accounts become plausible rather than surprising. What a transitional center is supposed to be is the last, best chance for someone to leave with a job and a place to live. Whether Metro is that, for the 441 men held there, is a question the public record does not yet answer.
Sources
This analysis draws on GPS's facility and personnel records for Metro Reintegration Center; GPS's mortality registry; GPS's systemwide findings on staffing collapse, classification drift, infrastructure failure, and food-service sanitation, including the October 2025 report "The Classification Crisis: How Four Medium Security Prisons Are Killing People"; the October 2024 U.S. Department of Justice findings letter and the 2024 Guidehouse assessment; The Marshall Project's May 16, 2026 investigation "Rats, Insects and Mold"; GDC Standard Operating Procedures; and family and witness accounts collected by GPS staff, including the Tell My Story account "An Email Trail as the Day Is Long," published by Georgia Prisoners' Speak.
Mortality Statistics
1 deaths documented at this facility from 2020 to present.
Deaths by Year
- 2026: 1
- 2025: 0
- 2024: 0
- 2023: 0
- 2022: 0
- 2021: 0
- 2020: 0
Food Safety Inspections
No inspection records are on file with the Georgia Department of Public Health for this facility. GPS has filed an open records request asking where these records are maintained.
What the score doesn't measure. DPH grades kitchen compliance on inspection day — food storage, temperatures, pest control. It does not grade whether today's trays are clean. GPS reporting has found broken dishwashers at most Georgia state prisons we've documented; trays go out wet, stacked, and visibly moldy — including at facilities with recent scores near 100.
Who inspects. Most Georgia state prisons sit in rural counties — often with fewer than 20,000 people, several with fewer than 10,000. The environmental health inspector lives in that community and often knows the kitchen staff personally. Rural inspection regimes don't have the structural independence you'd expect in a city-sized health department. Read the scores accordingly.
Read the investigation: “Dunked, Stacked and Served: Why Georgia Prison Trays Are Making People Sick”
Source Articles (1)
Former leadership
Officials who previously held leadership roles at this facility.
| Role | Name | Tenure | Deaths this facility / career |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORRECTIONAL ASST. SUPT (facility deputy) | Cofield, Desmond J | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 | — / 10 |