Sentencing, Parole & Recidivism
Georgia sentencing, parole and recidivism studies (NCJRS, 1977-2017)
This NCJRS corpus contains six federally published studies on Georgia corrections policy spanning 1977-2001. The studies cover sentencing reform under H.B. 1176 (2017), the Earned Time System evaluation (1977), split sentence and shock probation alternatives (1978), cross-jurisdictional time-served comparisons (1979), Intensive Probation Supervision (1987), and the RSAT substance abuse treatment program (2000). Key findings include a 13% decline in prison commitments following H.B. 1176, Georgia's 24.2-month average time served exceeding the national average of 18.3 months, and IPS diverting 2,322 probationers from prison between 1982-1985.
Key Findings
The most impactful data from this research collection.
Prison Population Doubled 1990-2011
Statistic30%
Recidivism Stagnant for a Decade
Statistic22.8
Rape: 22.8 Months Served
Statistic16%
16% IPS Returned to Prison
StatisticAll Data Points
116 verified data points extracted from primary sources.
Georgia prison population more than doubled 1990-2011 Statistic
Between 1990 and 2011, Georgia's prison population more than doubled, and annual corrections spending grew to more than $1 billion.
Georgia prison population 2016 Statistic
By 2016, the number of people incarcerated in Georgia's state prisons was 52,962, down from a peak of 54,895 in 2012.
52,962 people vs. peak in 2012
Georgia prison population 2011 Statistic
In 2011, nearly 56,000 people were incarcerated in Georgia's prison system.
56,000 people
Georgia prison system operating capacity 2011 Statistic
The state prison system was operating at 107 percent capacity in 2011.
107%
Projected Georgia prison population growth and cost Statistic
Officials estimated the prison population would increase an additional 8 percent in five years, costing an additional $264 million.
8% vs. additional cost in millions
Georgia recidivism rate stagnant for a decade Statistic
Recidivism rates had remained stagnant for at least a decade, and approximately 30 percent of people released from prison were reconvicted of a felony within three years.
30%
H.B. 1176 signed into law May 2012 Legal fact
House Bill 1176 was signed into law by Republican Governor Nathan Deal in May 2012. The bill passed unanimously in both the House and Senate and was signed on May 2, 2012.
H.B. 1176 provisions began implementation July 1, 2012 Legal fact
Provisions in H.B. 1176 began to be implemented on July 1, 2012, the beginning of fiscal year 2013.
H.B. 1176 burglary sentencing changes Legal fact
H.B. 1176 created degrees of burglary based on seriousness of offense; decreased maximum sentence length for second-degree burglary from 20 years to 5 years (1st conviction) and 8 years (2nd conviction); increased minimum and maximum sentence length…
H.B. 1176 theft threshold raised Legal fact
H.B. 1176 raised the felony theft threshold from $500 to $1,500 and created a graduated scale of penalties based on value of stolen items, reducing the maximum sentence for items valued at less than $5,000.
H.B. 1176 shoplifting threshold raised Legal fact
H.B. 1176 raised the felony shoplifting threshold from $300 to $500.
H.B. 1176 forgery changes Legal fact
H.B. 1176 created new degrees of forgery based on seriousness of the offense and a corresponding graduated scale of penalties; allowed some forgeries (fourth degree) to be categorized as misdemeanors; increased maximum sentence for the most serious …
H.B. 1176 fraud threshold raised Legal fact
H.B. 1176 raised the felony fraud threshold from $500 to $1,500.
H.B. 1176 drug possession changes Legal fact
H.B. 1176 created degrees of drug possession based on weight and a corresponding graduated scale of penalties; reduced the minimum and maximum sentence length for all drug weights; removed drug possession from the recidivist statute.
Overall commitments to prison and probation declined 10 percent Statistic
Overall commitments to prison and probation for offenses affected by H.B. 1176 fell from 28,604 in 2012 to 25,784 in 2015, a 10 percent decline.
10%
Prison commitments declined 13 percent after H.B. 1176 Statistic
Following implementation of H.B. 1176, commitments to prison for affected offenses declined 13 percent, and probation commitments fell 9 percent.
13% vs. probation commitments decline
Probation share of commitments rose 1 percentage point Statistic
The share of commitments to probation (relative to prison) increased slightly after H.B. 1176 took effect, rising 1 percentage point from 74 to 75 percent of commitments.
1%
Average prison sentence for drug possession fell 1.5 years Statistic
The average prison sentence length for drug possession fell 1.5 years, from 7.2 years to 5.6 years (a 23 percent decline).
1.5 years vs. percent decline
Time served declining for H.B. 1176 offenses Trend
Time served in prison and on probation has begun to decline for people convicted of offenses affected by H.B. 1176.
Burglary prison commitments declined 10.6 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, burglary prison commitments declined from 3,176 to 2,840, a 10.6 percent decline.
10.6%
Burglary probation commitments declined 9.6 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, burglary probation commitments declined from 4,960 to 4,483, a 9.6 percent decline.
9.6%
Drug possession prison commitments nearly steady Statistic
Prison commitments for drug possession stayed fairly steady between 2012 and 2015, declining only 0.2 percent from 1,172 to 1,170.
0.2%
Drug possession probation commitments increased 24.6 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, drug possession probation commitments increased from 6,145 to 7,658, a 24.6 percent increase.
24.6%
Forgery prison commitments declined 43.2 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, forgery prison commitments declined from 1,175 to 667, a 43.2 percent decline.
43.2%
Forgery probation commitments declined 43.3 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, forgery probation commitments declined from 3,217 to 1,824, a 43.3 percent decline.
43.3%
Fraud prison commitments declined 33.3 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, fraud prison commitments declined from 3 to 2, a 33.3 percent decline.
33.3%
Fraud probation commitments declined 65.7 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, fraud probation commitments declined from 70 to 24, a 65.7 percent decline.
65.7%
Shoplifting prison commitments increased 25.3 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, shoplifting prison commitments increased from 395 to 495, a 25.3 percent increase.
25.3%
Shoplifting probation commitments increased 8.9 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, shoplifting probation commitments increased from 1,135 to 1,236, an 8.9 percent increase.
8.9%
Theft prison commitments declined 15.2 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, theft prison commitments declined from 1,571 to 1,332, a 15.2 percent decline.
15.2%
Theft probation commitments declined 27.4 percent Statistic
Between 2012 and 2015, theft probation commitments declined from 5,585 to 4,053, a 27.4 percent decline.
27.4%
Total prison commitments 2012-2015 Statistic
Total prison commitments for offenses affected by H.B. 1176 declined from 7,492 in 2012 to 6,506 in 2015, a 13.2 percent decline.
13.2%
Total probation commitments 2012-2015 Statistic
Total probation commitments for offenses affected by H.B. 1176 declined from 21,112 in 2012 to 19,278 in 2015, an 8.7 percent decline.
8.7%
H.B. 265 formed Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform Legal fact
In April 2011, H.B. 265 set reform efforts in motion by forming the Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians, a group with bipartisan representation from all three branches of government, and the Joint Committee on Criminal Justice R…
Justice Reinvestment Initiative partnership Policy
State leaders sought support for reform efforts through the Justice Reinvestment Initiative, a public-private partnership jointly funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Bureau of Justice Assistance at the US Department of Justice.
Earned Time System implemented after 15 months as Georgia law Finding
After 15 months as a Georgia law, the Earned Time System is implemented to a greater or lesser degree in every state and county institution.
Earned Time System success depends on management support Finding
The success of the Earned Time System lies primarily with the motivation projected by upper management. Where managers supported staff efforts and encouraged innovations, the System has been most thoroughly implemented; where staff perceived that su…
Counselor caseloads of 190 at Southwest District institution Case detail
At a smaller state institution in the Southwest District, counselors were faced with caseloads of 190 each yet, encouraged by upper management, developed Performance Plans in a thorough if not timely manner.
County camp lacked managerial support for ETS Case detail
At a county camp in the Northern District, with similar caseloads but no managerial support, Plans were completed sporadically and Quarterlies and performance reports not at all.
ETS procedural deadline of 60 days for Plan development Policy
Timeline problems need to be addressed, perhaps by altering the procedural deadline of 60 days for Plan development.
ETS training needed in need assessment and Plan development Finding
Overall, more training of a more specific nature seems to be needed, particularly in the areas of need assessment and Plan development.
ETS evaluation funded by LEAA Methodology note
This evaluation was produced under the auspices of the Program Evaluation Section, Evaluation and Monitoring Services of the Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation. Funds were provided by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) u…
Federal split sentence statute enacted 1958 Legal fact
Utilization of the split sentence became a formalized federal practice with the passage in 1958 of the Federal Split Sentence statute (18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3651). Under this law, an offender could be sentenced to a period of up to six months of incarcer…
Federal split sentence usage 5.6 percent in FY 1976 Statistic
Use of the split sentence disposition accounted for 5.6% of all convicted defendants who were sentenced in U.S. District courts in FY 1976.
5.6%
California first state to authorize split sentence in 1927 Legal fact
At the state level, California was the first state to authorize a split sentence when, in 1927, it enacted a statutory provision permitting imprisonment in a county jail as a condition of probation.
Split sentence usage in Georgia 3.1 percent in FY 1976 Statistic
Utilization of the split sentence represented 3.1% of all convicted defendants sentenced in Georgia District Courts in FY 1976.
3.1%
Split sentence used as alternative to longer incarceration in Georgia Finding
An analysis of the data on its usage clearly indicates that the split sentence has been utilized in Georgia as an alternative to longer periods of incarceration and not as an alternative to probation.
Shock probation programs in three Georgia institutions Statistic
Shock probation programs (a form of split sentence) presently are utilized in three of Georgia's correctional institutions.
3 institutions
Georgia shock probation program description Policy
The most frequently used shock probation program involves taking a probationer, who is on the verge of having his probation revoked, to an institution for a period of time and allowing him to go through a mock entry into the institution as well as s…
Georgia correctional personnel support shock probation Finding
The vast majority of Georgia correctional personnel (Probation/Parole Supervisors, Institution Superintendents, etc.) feel that such a program can serve as an effective deterrent. Moreover, it will lessen the chances of recidivism, strengthen the co…
North Carolina overall average time served 31.7 months Statistic
North Carolina's overall average time served was 31.7 months, compared with the National Average of 18.3 months, Florida at 25.9 months, Georgia at 24.2 months, and South Carolina at 17.8 months.
31.7 months vs. national average
Georgia average time served 24.2 months Statistic
Georgia's overall average time served was 24.2 months, higher than the national average of 18.3 months and South Carolina's 17.8 months, but lower than North Carolina's 31.7 months and Florida's 25.9 months.
24.2 months vs. national average
Georgia murder second degree average time served 38.7 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for murder second degree was 38.7 months, compared with North Carolina's 75.1 months and the national average of 47.5 months.
38.7 months vs. national average
Georgia manslaughter average time served 58.1 months Statistic
Georgia's 1961-1975 average time served for manslaughter was 58.1 months, compared with North Carolina's 42.4 months and the national average of 25.3 months.
58.1 months vs. national average
Georgia robbery with firearm average time served 37.8 months Statistic
Georgia's 1961-1975 average time served for robbery with a firearm was 37.8 months, compared with North Carolina's 49.7 months and the national average of 29.7 months.
37.8 months vs. national average
Georgia robbery with deadly weapon average time served 29.3 months Statistic
Georgia's 1961-1975 average time served for robbery with a deadly weapon was 29.3 months, compared with North Carolina's 29.4 months and the national average of 16.4 months.
29.3 months vs. national average
Georgia unarmed robbery average time served 33.9 months Statistic
Georgia's 1961-1975 average time served for unarmed robbery was 33.9 months, compared with North Carolina's 23.3 months and the national average of 39.6 months.
33.9 months vs. national average
Georgia assault with deadly weapon average time served 55.9 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for assault with a deadly weapon was 55.9 months, compared with North Carolina's 27.5 months and the national average of 15.7 months.
55.9 months vs. national average
Georgia rape average time served 22.8 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for rape was 22.8 months, compared with North Carolina's 68.5 months and the national average of 13.8 months.
22.8 months vs. national average
Georgia burglary 1st degree average time served 16.7 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for burglary 1st degree was 16.7 months, compared with North Carolina's 21.7 months and the national average of 13.1 months.
16.7 months vs. national average
Georgia burglary 2nd degree average time served 16.7 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for burglary 2nd degree was 16.7 months, compared with North Carolina's 21.7 months and the national average of 13.2 months.
16.7 months vs. national average
Georgia grand theft average time served 16.7 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for grand theft was 16.7 months, compared with North Carolina's 21.7 months and the national average of 13.1 months.
16.7 months vs. national average
Georgia grand theft auto average time served 16.7 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for grand theft auto was 16.7 months, compared with North Carolina's 21.7 months and the national average of 13.2 months.
16.7 months vs. national average
Georgia forgery and checks average time served 16.7 months Statistic
Georgia's 1977 average time served for forgery and checks was 16.7 months, compared with North Carolina's 21.7 months and the national average of 13.2 months.
16.7 months vs. national average
North Carolina ranked top five in time served for most crime categories Finding
Among the 17 states compared, North Carolina ranked in the top five in average months served for all crime categories except Assault with a Deadly Weapon.
North Carolina longest time served for rape and grand theft auto Finding
The time served by North Carolina prisoners for Rape and Grand Theft Auto was longer than that served in any of the other 16 states listed in the table.
Georgia IPS program implemented 1982 Policy
Georgia's Intensive Probation Supervision (IPS) program was implemented in 1982.
IPS began as pilot in 13 of 45 judicial circuits Statistic
The IPS program began in 1982 as a pilot in 13 of Georgia's 45 judicial sentencing circuits.
13 circuits vs. total circuits
IPS expanded to 33 circuits by end of 1985 Statistic
By the end of 1985, IPS had expanded to 33 circuits and had supervised 2,322 probationers.
33 circuits vs. probationers supervised
IPS supervised 2,322 probationers 1982-1985 Statistic
Between 1982 and 1985, the IPS program supervised 2,322 probationers.
2,322 probationers
370 IPS probationers absconded or revoked Statistic
Of the 2,322 people in the IPS program between 1982 and 1985, 370 (or 16 percent) absconded or had their probation revoked.
370 probationers vs. percent
1,952 IPS probationers successfully diverted from prison Statistic
The remaining 1,952 IPS probationers were successfully diverted from prison; many are still under some form of probationary supervision.
1,952 probationers
15 percent of IPS probationers successfully completed sentences Statistic
Fifteen percent of IPS probationers have successfully completed their sentences.
15%
16 percent of IPS probationers returned to prison Statistic
Only 16 percent of IPS probationers have been removed from the program and returned to prison for technical violations or new crimes.
16%
IPS reduced risk to community Finding
The study suggests that in Georgia, the more stringent supervision reduced the risk to the community. Offenders in IPS committed fewer and less serious crimes than comparison groups of regular probationers and those released from prison.
IPS supervision standards Policy
IPS standards include: five face-to-face contacts per week; 132 hours of mandatory community service; mandatory curfew; mandatory employment; weekly check of local arrest records; automatic notification of arrest elsewhere via the State Crime Inform…
IPS team composition Policy
The supervision standards are enforced by a team consisting of a Probation Officer and a Surveillance Officer. The team supervises 25 probationers. In some jurisdictions, a team of one Probation Officer and two Surveillance Officers supervises 40 pr…
Georgia sentencing statistics show 10 percent reduction in incarceration Statistic
Georgia sentencing statistics from 1982 through 1985 show a 10-percent reduction in the percentage of felons sentenced to incarceration.
10%
Georgia probation placement increased 10 percent 1982-1985 Statistic
The percentage of offenders placed on probation increased 10 percent (from 63 percent in 1982 to 73 percent in 1985).
10%
IPS jurisdictions showed 15-27 percent increase in probation Statistic
Jurisdictions with intensive supervision teams showed an increase of 15 to 27 percent in the percentage of offenders on probation, markedly higher than the statewide average increase of 10 percent.
15% vs. upper range
IPS cost less than prison stay Finding
The cost of IPS, while much greater than regular probation, is considerably less than the cost of a prison stay, even when construction costs are not considered.
IPS evaluation methodology Methodology note
For offenders sentenced during 1983, the first year the program was fully operational, evaluators compared the profiles of three groups: IPS probationers, regular probationers, and prison releasees. A computer selected the sample of 200 regular prob…
IPS evaluation funded by NIJ Methodology note
The evaluation was conducted by the Georgia Department of Corrections, Office of Evaluation and Statistics, and was assisted by an Advisory Board funded by the National Institute of Justice.
RSAT program operated by Spectrum Health Services/CiviGenics Policy
The RSAT program is provided by Spectrum Health Services/CiviGenics (SHS), an independent vendor of health services operating in the GDC since 1994.
Seven RSAT programs at four Georgia prisons Statistic
There are seven RSAT programs operating at four prisons in the GDC system: Scott, Macon, Calhoun, and Pulaski State Prisons.
7 programs vs. prisons
RSAT program total beds 310 Statistic
A total of 310 beds are available for RSAT program participants.
310 beds
RSAT program fidelity to design Finding
Findings suggest that the RSAT program is operating in a way that is reflective of its design and the intent of its designers. There appears to be a significant degree of fidelity between the actual and proposed programs regarding the structure, set…
RSAT program benefits cited Finding
Benefits of the RSAT program cited by those interviewed included lower rates of institutional misconduct and significant attitudinal and behavioral change as participants progress through the program.
RSAT program weaknesses identified Finding
Weaknesses cited by both RSAT staff and correctional administrators focused on the selection and referral processes and the lack of sufficient aftercare services once graduates are released from prison. Specific factors cited included a lack of comm…
RSAT evaluation methodology Methodology note
A variety of methods and data sources were utilized in the writing of this report, including interviews with GDC and SHS staff, examination of computerized databases, observation at service delivery sites, and examination of a variety of written mat…
RSAT evaluation conducted by Wellsys Corporation Methodology note
The process evaluation was conducted by Wellsys Corporation, under contract to the GDC.
RSAT evaluation funded by NIJ grant Methodology note
The RSAT process evaluation was funded through the U.S. Department of Justice under Award Number 99-RT-VX-K008.
Georgia Cognitive Skills Program first statewide effort with parolees Finding
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Program is the first known statewide effort to employ cognitive skills training with parolees.
Georgia Cognitive Skills Program began 1997 Policy
Since 1997, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles (GBPP) has undertaken an ambitious statewide implementation and evaluation of Ross and Fabiano's (1985) Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program (R&R).
50 parole officers trained as cognitive coaches Statistic
Beginning in 1997, Elizabeth Fabiano and Frank Porporino, authorities in cognitive skills programming, trained approximately 50 parole officers across the state of Georgia, with retrainings held as needed.
50 parole officers
30 parole districts and 3 institutions administered R&R Statistic
A total of 30 parole districts and three correctional institutions administered R&R to offenders.
30 parole districts vs. correctional institutions
Phase I randomly assigned 468 parolees Statistic
The Phase I evaluation randomly assigned 468 parolees to either an experimental group (N = 232) or a control group (N = 236) in 16 parole districts.
468 parolees
Phase II randomly assigned 1193 offenders Statistic
Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment employed an experimental design whereby 1193 offenders were randomly assigned to either the treatment (N = 609) or control group (N = 584).
1,193 offenders
Phase II ran July 1998 to April 2000 at 28 sites Statistic
From July 1998 to April 2000, 28 sites across Georgia participated in Phase II: 25 parole districts and three correctional institutions.
28 sites
Cognitive Skills Program screening criteria Policy
Program selection criteria screened out parolees with IQ scores lower than 80 as well as those with histories of sexual offending or debilitating substance abuse. High risk offenders were targeted for inclusion in the program.
Cognitive Skills participants mostly male Statistic
Most of the participants are men (91.3%) and were between the ages of 18 and 35 (69.0%) at the beginning of the program, with an average age of 32.
91.3% vs. percent aged 18-35
Cognitive Skills participants mostly nonwhite Statistic
The participants may be further profiled as mostly nonwhite (68.5%). Of the 409 nonwhite participants, one is Native American and the rest are African American.
68.5%
Cognitive Skills participants employment and education Statistic
Self-reports of employment and educational achievement at prison intake indicate that 50.9% were not employed full time at the time of their arrest and 65.4% did not complete high school.
50.9% vs. percent without high school completion
Cognitive Skills participants reading level Statistic
A substantial portion of participants have minimal reading skills, as evidenced by 26.4% scoring below a fifth grade reading level on the WRAT reading assessment.
26.4%
Cognitive Skills participants average IQ Statistic
The average IQ is 100.8, with 8.2% having IQs below 80.
100.8 IQ points vs. percent below 80
Cognitive Skills participants substance abuse history Statistic
Slightly over half (56.8%) were noted in Georgia's offender information tracking system (OTIS) files to have a history of substance abuse.
56.8%
Cognitive Skills participants risk classification Statistic
Half (49.2%) were classified by the risk score as medium/high risk.
49.2%
Cognitive Skills participants prior incarceration Statistic
A slight majority (58.1%) had been incarcerated multiple times including their last incarceration experience, and nearly half (44.1%) have prior parole revocations in their history.
58.1% vs. percent with prior parole revocations
Cognitive Skills participants prior felony convictions Statistic
Only one participant (.2%) had no felony convictions other than those leading to his last incarceration; 48% had three or more prior felony convictions.
48%
Cognitive Skills participants property crime convictions most common Statistic
Of the various types of crimes committed by study participants prior to those that resulted in their last incarceration, property crime convictions were the most common (72.4%), followed by drug possession convictions (62.0%). Violent convictions (4…
72.4% vs. drug possession convictions
18 participants had sex crime convictions despite screening Statistic
Despite screening criteria to exclude sex offenders, 18 participants (3.0%) had histories of sex crime convictions.
18 participants vs. percent
Low risk offenders constituted half of experimental group Statistic
Low risk offenders constitute half (50.8%) of the experimental group.
50.8%
48 experimental group members had IQs below 80 Statistic
For 48 (8.2%) of the experimental group, IQs are low enough (i.e., below 80) to call into question the appropriateness of their inclusion in the study.
48 participants vs. percent
Randomization procedures successful Finding
Analyses reveal great similarity between the two groups, confirming the integrity of the experimental design. Only one statistically significant difference exists between the experimental and control groups.
Experimental group had more prior property convictions Statistic
Chi square analysis indicates that a greater proportion of the experimental group had eight or more prior property convictions (experimental = 23.3%; control = 19.0%; p < .05), but the median number of prior property convictions for both groups is t…
23.3% vs. control group percent
Cognitive Skills study funded by NIJ and GBPP Methodology note
This study was funded through the Office of Justice Programs for the National Institute of Justice (Grant #98-CE-VX-0013) and by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Sources
7 cited sources backing this research.
Primary
Official report
Primary
Official report
Primary
Official report
Primary
Official report
Primary
Official report
Primary
Official report
Key Entities
Organizations, people, facilities, and other named entities referenced in this research.
Calhoun State Prison
[facility]
Earned Time System
[program]
Federal Split Sentence Statute
[legislation]
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
[organization]
Georgia Cognitive Skills Program
[program]
Georgia Department of Corrections
[organization]
House Bill 1176
[legislation]
House Bill 265
[legislation]
Intensive Probation Supervision
[program]
Justice Reinvestment Initiative
[program]
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration
[organization]
Macon State Prison
[facility]
Nathan Deal
[person]
National Institute of Justice
[organization]
Pulaski State Prison
[facility]
Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program
[program]
Scott State Prison
[facility]
Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians
[organization]
Spectrum Health Services/CiviGenics
[organization]
U.S. Department of Justice
[organization]
Wellsys Corporation
[organization]
Related Topics
Research topics that draw on data from this collection.
Parole & Sentencing
Georgia's parole pipeline has contracted sharply: the Board of Pardons and Paroles released 5,588 people in FY2025, down roughly 42 percent from 9,455 in FY2019, while the share of people leaving prison at sentence expiration climbed. Life-sentenced Georgians now serve an average of 28 years before release — up from less than nine in 1973 — and the Board granted parole in 4.5 percent of life cases in FY2024. The result is a smaller, later, more selective release system operating alongside an aging prison population and record corrections spending.
11,379 data points
Policy & Advocacy
Georgia's prison policy is a documented record of what the state has chosen to fund, pass, and leave untouched. Two decades of bipartisan sentencing reform — H.B. 1176, H.B. 310, S.B. 174, Act 226 — produced measurable reductions in commitments and probation volume, yet the highest-impact structural proposals (parole expansion, independent oversight, habeas reform) remain unenacted or, in the case of oversight, never introduced at all. Against a $600 million emergency spending package and a 2024 DOJ Eighth Amendment finding, the evidence base assembled here shows reform costing a fraction of one percent of GDC's budget and a 2026 statewide candidate field in which only 3 of 30-plus candidates have detailed prison policy positions.
6,932 data points
Recidivism & Reentry
Georgia measures reentry success with a single narrow number — felony reconviction within three years — which has ranged from roughly 24 to 31 percent over the past decade and excludes misdemeanor arrests, parole and probation violations, reoffending after year three, and everyone who dies before the window closes. Behind that number, the state releases roughly 12,000 to 16,000 people a year — more than half at sentence expiration with no parole supervision — into a reentry system with 2,344 transitional beds, no dedicated reentry line item in the GDC budget, and a first-two-weeks death risk 12.7 times the general population's. The interventions that reduce recidivism are among the best-evidenced in corrections; Georgia's spending on them is a rounding error.
8,109 data points
Reform Models & Programs
Georgia has repeatedly designed, piloted, and evaluated evidence-based rehabilitation models — cognitive-skills curricula, earned-time incentives, intensive supervision, reentry housing, addiction treatment — and then starved them of scale and funding. The national evidence base is unambiguous: cognitive-behavioral programs reduce recidivism 20–30%, correctional education cuts recidivism odds by 43% and returns $4–$5 per dollar spent, and vocational completers in Georgia recidivate at roughly half the general rate. Georgia's FY2027 budget nonetheless cut education line items while adding $22.1 million in new surveillance spending, and the state still publishes no outcome data that would let the public judge whether any of its programs work.
11,653 data points