Parole
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment: Process Evaluation, Phase Two (NCJ 248529, 2001)
This document is the final chunk (pages 136-158) of the Phase Two process evaluation of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment, a University of Cincinnati study for the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles. It contains detailed appendices (K through Q) with class session characteristics, observer evaluation scales, and participant evaluation responses across numerous Georgia parole districts and facilities. Key findings include high rates of program completion (ranging from 51.9% to 95% across sites), generally positive participant assessments of program adherence, relevance, and group climate, and methodological notes documenting screening and data quality limitations.
Key Findings
The most impactful data from this research collection.
17%
Phase I Recidivism Reduction for Completers
Statistic4%
Phase I Recidivism Reduction Not Significant
Statistic10.2%
10.2% Inappropriate for Program
Statistic54%
Over Half Inappropriate Including Low Risk
Statistic76.9%
77% of Classes Exceeded Recommended Size
Statistic26.4%
Below Fifth Grade Reading Level
Statistic62.7%
62.7% Program Completion Rate
Statistic8.2%
44% Below IQ 80
StatisticDropouts Recidivated at Highest Rates
Finding40.4%
Classes Exceeding Recommended Size
Statistic13.1%
26% Never Started Program
Statistic24.1%
Dropout Rate by Session 30
Statistic62.7%
Phase II Completion Rate
Statistic10.2%
Inappropriate Program Placements
StatisticNearly All Classes Exceeded Recommended Size
FindingAll Data Points
500 verified data points extracted from primary sources.
Experimental group gender distribution Statistic
Most Phase II participants were men (91.3%), with 545 males and 52 females in the experimental group of 597.
91.3%
Phase II total study participants Statistic
Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment randomly assigned 1,193 offenders to either the treatment (N=609) or control group (N=584).
1,193 offenders
Experimental group medium/high risk proportion Statistic
Proportionately more of the experimental group are medium/high risk (experimental = 49.2%; control = 44.8%), but this difference is not statistically significant.
49.2% vs. control group
Adherence to social learning methods mean score Statistic
Participants rated coaches' adherence to social learning methods with a mean score of 4.3 (SD 0.5) on a 1-5 scale, with 98.7% of participants scoring above neutral.
4.3 mean score (1-5 scale)
Brunswick completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Brunswick parole district, 62.1% of program participants (18 of 29) were still in the program at class 30, 37.9% (11) did not complete, and none never began.
62.1%
Marietta experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Marietta was 29.5 years (N=55).
29.5 years
Phase I recidivism reduction for class completers vs control group Statistic
Discrete time survival analysis, controlling for relevant background characteristics, produced statistically significant treatment effects of 17% on returns to prison and 19% on re-arrests for class completers compared to the control group in Phase …
17%
Experimental group age distribution Statistic
Most participants (69.0%) were between ages 18 and 35 at the beginning of the program, with an average age of 32.2. Age breakdown: 18-25 (27.1%), 26-36 (41.9%), 36-50 (27.1%), 50+ (3.9%).
32.2 years
Phase II experimental group size Statistic
The experimental (treatment) group in Phase II consisted of 609 offenders.
609 offenders
Prior property convictions difference between groups Statistic
Twenty-three percent of the experimental group had eight or more prior property convictions, compared to 19.0% of the control group; the median number of prior property convictions for both groups is two. This was the only statistically significant …
23% vs. control group
Relevance of skills to participant mean score Statistic
Participants rated the relevance of skills to participants with a mean score of 4.2 (SD 0.5) on a 1-5 scale, with 97.2% of participants scoring above neutral.
4.2 mean score (1-5 scale)
North Fulton completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the North Fulton parole district, 57.1% of program participants (8 of 14) were still in the program at class 30, 7.3% (1) did not complete, and 35.7% (5) never began.
57.1%
Marietta experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Marietta, 41.8% of the experimental group was White and 58.2% was nonwhite (N=55).
58.2%
Phase I re-arrest reduction for class completers vs control group Statistic
Discrete time survival analysis, controlling for relevant background characteristics, produced statistically significant treatment effects of 19% on re-arrests for class completers compared to the control group in Phase I of the Georgia Cognitive Sk…
19%
Experimental group racial composition Statistic
Participants were mostly nonwhite (68.5%); of the 409 nonwhite participants, one was Native American and the rest were African American.
68.5%
Phase II control group size Statistic
The control group in Phase II consisted of 584 offenders.
584 offenders
Substance abuse history in study sample Statistic
56.4% of the total study sample (660 of 1171) had a history of substance abuse; 43.6% (511 of 1171) had no history of substance abuse.
56.4%
Group climate mean score Statistic
Participants rated group climate with a mean score of 3.9 (SD 0.6) on a 1-5 scale, with 90.0% of participants scoring above neutral. This was the lowest-rated of the three participant evaluation scales.
3.9 mean score (1-5 scale)
Cairo completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Cairo parole district, 68.8% of program participants (33 of 48) were still in the program at class 30, 10.4% (5) did not complete, and 20.8% (10) never began.
68.8%
Marietta experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Marietta, 52.7% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=55).
52.7%
Phase I overall recidivism reduction not statistically significant Statistic
The 4% lower return to prison and re-arrest rates for the experimental group compared to the control group in Phase I were not statistically significant.
4%
Experimental group employment status at arrest Statistic
50.9% of participants were not employed full time at the time of their arrest. Employment breakdown: employed full time (49.1%), employed part time (10.0%), unemployed less than 6 months (15.4%), unemployed 6+ months (16.5%), never worked but capabl…
50.9%
Phase II study sites Statistic
From July 1998 to April 2000, 28 sites across Georgia participated in Phase II: 25 parole districts and three correctional institutions.
28 sites
Average IQ of study participants Statistic
The average IQ of experimental group participants was 100.8, control group participants averaged 101.0, and the total sample averaged 100.9.
100.9 IQ points
Coaches read from manual majority of class time Statistic
68.9% of program participants indicated that coaches read from the program manual the majority of the class time. The meaning of this high proportion is unclear, as it may include both appropriate and inappropriate use of the manual.
68.9%
Griffin completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Griffin parole district, 75.0% of program participants (9 of 12) were still in the program at class 30, 25.0% (3) did not complete, and none never began.
75%
Marietta experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Marietta was 105.3 (N=55).
105.3 IQ points
Phase I random assignment sample size Statistic
The Phase I evaluation randomly assigned 468 parolees to either an experimental group (N = 232) or a control group (N = 236) in 16 parole districts.
468 parolees
Experimental group educational attainment Statistic
65.4% of participants did not complete high school. Education breakdown: less than high school (8.6%), some high school (56.8%), high school (22.5%), at least some technical school (3.2%), at least some college (9.0%).
65.4%
Phase II parole district sites Statistic
25 parole districts participated in Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment.
25 parole districts
Reading level below 5th grade in sample Statistic
27.3% of the total study sample (313 of 1148) read below 5th grade level; 72.7% (835 of 1148) read at 5th grade level or above.
27.3%
Monthly meetings with supervising parole officer during program Statistic
Not including the Cognitive Skills meetings, participants met with their supervising parole officer an average of 1.9 times per month (SD 1.0) while in the Cognitive Skills program.
1.9 meetings per month
LaGrange completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district, 83.3% of program participants (10 of 12) were still in the program at class 30, 16.7% (2) did not complete, and none never began.
83.3%
Marietta experimental group reading level Statistic
At Marietta, 13.0% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 87.0% read at 5th grade or above (N=55).
13%
Phase I experimental group size Statistic
Phase I randomly assigned 232 parolees to the experimental group.
232 parolees
Experimental group reading level below fifth grade Statistic
26.4% of participants (154 of 584) scored below a fifth-grade reading level on the WRAT reading assessment.
26.4%
Phase II correctional institution sites Statistic
Three correctional institutions participated in Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment.
3 institutions
Marital status distribution of study sample Statistic
Of the total study sample (1165), 63.2% were single (never married), 11.0% married, 5.2% separated, 9.1% divorced, 1.2% widowed, 10.2% common law marriage, and 0.1% other.
63.2%
No significant subgroup differences in participant evaluation scales Finding
Chi square and difference of means analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in participant evaluation scale scores (adherence to social learning methods, relevance of skills, group climate) across categories of sex, race, setting, …
LaFayette completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the LaFayette parole district, 76.9% of program participants (10 of 13) were still in the program at class 30, 15.4% (2) did not complete, and 7.7% (1) never began.
76.9%
Marietta experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Marietta experimental group was 0.5, with a median of 0.0 (N=55).
0.5 prior incarcerations
Phase I control group size Statistic
Phase I randomly assigned 236 parolees to the control group.
236 parolees
Experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of experimental group participants was 100.8, with 8.2% having IQs below 80. IQ breakdown: 50-80 (8.2%), 81-99 (34.5%), 100-115 (43.2%), 116-139 (14.2%).
100.8 IQ points
Phase I total study participants Statistic
The Phase I evaluation randomly assigned 468 parolees to either an experimental group (N=232) or a control group (N=236) in 16 parole districts.
468 parolees
Prior incarceration distribution in sample Statistic
Of the total study sample (1171), 41.8% had no prior incarcerations, 27.2% had one, 13.6% had two, 8.1% had three, 5.1% had four, and 4.3% had five or more prior incarcerations.
41.8%
Women more likely to report coaches did not read from manual Statistic
64.0% of women and 19.6% of men indicated that coaches did not read from the manual the majority of the class time. This was the only significant sex difference found in participant evaluations.
64% vs. men
Brunswick parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Brunswick parole district, 95.0% of parolees (19 of 20) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
95%
Marietta experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Marietta experimental group was 2.6, with a median of 2.0 (N=55).
2.6 prior felony convictions
Experimental group marital status Statistic
Most participants (60.8%) were single. Marital status breakdown: single (60.8%), married (10.6%), separated (5.7%), divorced (10.6%), widowed (1.2%), common law marriage (11.0%).
60.8%
Phase I experimental group size Statistic
The Phase I experimental group consisted of 232 parolees.
232 parolees
Prior felony convictions in sample Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for both experimental and control groups was 2.9, with a median of 2.0. 25.3% of the experimental group and 25.0% of the control group had no prior felony convictions.
2.9 mean prior felony convictions
Personality type differences in reports of coaches reading from manual Statistic
Neurotics (40.4%) and situationals (39.1%) were more likely to indicate that coaches did not read from the manual the majority of class time, compared to 26.9% of aggressives and 20.3% of dependents.
40.4% vs. dependents
North Fulton parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the North Fulton parole district, 100.0% of parolees (9 of 9) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Marietta experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Marietta experimental group was 0.8, with a median of 0.0 (N=55).
0.8 prior violent convictions
Phase II total sample size Statistic
Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment employed an experimental design whereby 1193 offenders were randomly assigned to either the treatment (N = 609) or control group (N = 584).
1,193 offenders
Experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
Slightly over half (56.8%) of participants were noted in OTIS files to have a history of substance abuse.
56.8%
Phase I control group size Statistic
The Phase I control group consisted of 236 parolees.
236 parolees
Prior violent convictions in sample Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for both experimental and control groups was 1.2, with a median of 0.0. 56.0% of the total sample had no prior violent convictions.
1.2 mean prior violent convictions
I-Level 4 participants more likely to report coaches did not read from manual Statistic
Forty percent of I-Level 4 participants responded that coaches did not read from the manual the majority of the class time, while 23.8% of I-Levels 2 and 3 did so.
40% vs. I-Levels 2 and 3
Cairo parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Cairo parole district, 65.5% of parolees (19 of 29) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
65.5%
Marietta experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Marietta experimental group was 4.0, with a median of 2.0 (N=55).
4 prior property convictions
Phase II experimental group size Statistic
Phase II randomly assigned 609 offenders to the treatment (experimental) group.
609 offenders
Experimental group social class distribution Statistic
Prison counselors characterized 79.8% of participants as maintaining at least a minimum standard of living. Social class breakdown: welfare (9.1%), occasionally employed (11.1%), minimum standard (39.6%), middle class (40.2%).
79.8%
Phase I parole district sites Statistic
Phase I of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment was conducted in 16 parole districts.
16 parole districts
Prior drug sale convictions in sample Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions was 0.7 for the experimental group and 0.8 for the control group, with a median of 0.0 for both. 57.3% of the total sample had no prior drug sale convictions.
0.7 mean prior drug sale convictions (experimental) vs. control group mean
Eight percent of experimental group have IQs at or below 80 Statistic
Eight percent of the experimental group have IQs at or below 80, making it unlikely that they will be able to fully comprehend the material covered in the program.
8%
Griffin parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Griffin parole district, 100.0% of parolees (12 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Marietta experimental group prior drug sale convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions for the Marietta experimental group was 0.9, with a median of 0.0 (N=55).
0.9 prior drug sale convictions
Phase II control group size Statistic
Phase II randomly assigned 584 offenders to the control group.
584 offenders
Experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
Half (49.2%) of the experimental group were classified as medium/high risk, while 50.8% were classified as low risk.
50.8% vs. low risk
Percentage of male participants in Phase II Statistic
Most of the Phase II participants are men (91.3%).
91.3%
Prior drug possession convictions in sample Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions was 2.2 for the experimental group and 2.1 for the control group, with a median of 1.0 for both. 37.4% of the total sample had no prior drug possession convictions.
2.2 mean prior drug possession convictions (experimental) vs. control group mean
Sex offenders represented in experimental group Statistic
Sex offenders, some with extensive histories of sexually offending, are represented in the experimental sample at 3%, despite being considered inappropriate for the program.
3%
LaGrange parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district, 100.0% of parolees (12 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Marietta experimental group prior drug possession convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions for the Marietta experimental group was 2.5, with a median of 2.0 (N=55).
2.5 prior drug possession convictions
Experimental group prior incarceration history Statistic
A slight majority (58.1%) had multiple prior incarcerations. Breakdown: none (41.9%), one (27.0%), two (14.4%), three (7.2%), four (5.7%), five or more (3.9%). Mean was 1.2, median 1.0.
58.1%
Percentage of participants aged 18-35 Statistic
69.0% of Phase II participants were between the ages of 18 and 35 at the beginning of the program.
69%
Prior sex crime convictions in sample Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions was 0.1 for both experimental and control groups, with a median of 0.0. 96.3% of the total sample (1128 of 1171) had no prior sex crime convictions.
0.1 mean prior sex crime convictions
10.2% of experimental group inappropriate for program due to IQ or sex offender status Statistic
Due to the inclusion of offenders with low cognitive ability (8%) and of sex offenders (3%), 10.2% of the experimental group are inappropriate for the program.
10.2%
LaFayette parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the LaFayette parole district, 81.8% of parolees (9 of 11) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
81.8%
Marietta experimental group prior sex crime convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions for the Marietta experimental group was 0.1, with a median of 0.0 (N=55).
0.1 prior sex crime convictions
Phase II number of parole districts Statistic
Phase II included 25 parole districts across Georgia.
25 parole districts
Experimental group prior parole revocations Statistic
Nearly half (44.1%) of experimental group participants had prior parole revocations.
44.1%
Average age of Phase II participants Statistic
The average age of Phase II participants was 32 at the beginning of the program.
32 years
Unequal experimental and control group sizes Finding
25 of the 52 sets of experimental and control groups in the study were not the same size. Ten of these were due to odd numbers of offenders in lists sent to the GBPP. Fifteen occasions had one group with two or more members than the other group, ind…
Over half of experimental group inappropriate for program when low risk included Statistic
If the 299 low risk offenders are added to the pool of inappropriate participants, over half of the experimental group (54%) can be considered inappropriate for the program. However, Phase I found low risk offenders benefited from the R&R program.
54%
Brunswick parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Brunswick parole district, 100.0% of parolees (19 of 19) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Marietta experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
At Marietta, 79.2% of the experimental group was classified as low risk and 20.8% as medium/high risk (N=53).
79.2%
Phase II number of correctional institutions Statistic
Phase II included three correctional institutions.
3 institutions
Experimental group prior felony convictions Statistic
Only one participant (0.2%) had no prior felony convictions; 48% had three or more. Mean was 2.9, median 2.0. Breakdown: none (0.2%), one (24.8%), two (27.0%), three (18.6%), four (11.9%), five or more (17.6%).
48%
Percentage of nonwhite participants Statistic
Phase II participants were mostly nonwhite (68.5%). Of the 409 nonwhite participants, one was Native American and the rest were African American.
68.5%
I-Level distribution in experimental group Statistic
I-Levels 2 and 3 combined constitute 60.0% of the experimental group (308 of 513); I-Level 4 constitutes 40.0% (205 of 513). I-Level 2s alone constitute only 4.9% of the experimental group.
60%
299 low risk offenders in experimental group Statistic
The experimental group included 299 low risk offenders, who are considered inappropriate for the program under recommended targeting criteria.
299 offenders
North Fulton parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the North Fulton parole district, 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Marietta experimental group prior parole revocation Statistic
At Marietta, 16.5% of the experimental group had a prior parole revocation (N=55).
16.5%
Phase II total number of program groups Statistic
Phase II comprised a total of 52 groups of randomly assigned offenders.
52 groups
Experimental group prior property crime convictions Statistic
Property crime convictions were the most common prior offense type (72.4%). Breakdown: none (27.6%), one (13.9%), two (12.9%), three (6.0%), four (4.7%), five (4.5%), six (4.0%), seven (3.0%), eight or more (23.3%). Mean was 4.8, median 2.0.
72.4%
Number of nonwhite participants Statistic
Of the 409 nonwhite participants in Phase II, one was Native American and the rest were African American.
409 participants
Jesness Inventory personality type distribution Statistic
Within the experimental group, 32.2% were classified as Aggressives, 17.5% as Neurotics, 27.9% as Dependents, and 22.4% as Situationals. These distributions are very similar to those found in a sample of male federal penitentiary inmates (Van Voorhi…
32.2%
Only one statistically significant difference between experimental and control groups Finding
Comparisons of the experimental and control group on several areas of demographic, social, and criminal history characteristics yielded only one statistically significant difference, supporting the conclusion that randomization procedures were emplo…
Cairo parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Cairo parole district, 100.0% of parolees (28 of 28) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Clarkesville was 36.9 years (N=7).
36.9 years
Phase II non-experimental program groups Statistic
During Phase II, 10 additional groups of classes across eight sites (N = 98) occurred that were not involved in the experimental design of the evaluation; parole officers selected parolees to participate in R&R without comparison groups.
98 offenders
Experimental group prior drug possession convictions Statistic
Drug possession convictions were present in 62.0% of participants. Breakdown: none (38.0%), one (15.9%), two (13.4%), three (9.5%), four (7.7%), five or more (15.4%). Mean was 2.2, median 1.0.
62%
Percentage of participants maintaining minimum standard of living Statistic
Prison counselors at intake characterized 79.8% of the Phase II participants as maintaining at least a minimum standard of living.
79.8%
Recommended R&R class size Policy
Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R) courses are intended to be small, between four and six members, to facilitate coaches' management of program sessions and encourage active class participation (Ross, Fabiano, and Ross, 1989).
76.9% of classes exceeded recommended maximum of six offenders Statistic
Even taking into consideration the proportion of experimental group members that did not begin the program (13.1%), the majority of classes (76.9%) exceeded the recommended maximum of six offenders per group at the beginning of the program.
76.9%
Griffin parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Griffin parole district, 100.0% of parolees (12 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Clarkesville, 71.4% of the experimental group was White and 28.6% was nonwhite (N=7).
71.4%
Phase II non-experimental groups count Statistic
10 additional groups of classes across eight sites occurred during Phase II that were not involved in the experimental design.
10 groups
Experimental group prior violent convictions Statistic
Violent convictions were present in 43.9% of participants. Breakdown: none (56.1%), one (16.2%), two (10.1%), three (5.7%), four (3.9%), five or more (8.0%). Mean was 1.3, median 0.0.
43.9%
Percentage not employed full time at arrest Statistic
Self-reports of employment at prison intake indicate that 50.9% of Phase II participants were not employed full time at the time of their arrest.
50.9%
Program group size range Statistic
From six to 28 offenders were assigned to the Cognitive Skills Program groups, with the typical size around 11 (mean = 12; median = 10). Nearly all of the program groups created through the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program exceeded the recommended c…
12 mean assigned group size
13.1% of experimental group did not begin program Statistic
13.1% of experimental group members did not begin the program.
13.1%
LaGrange parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district, 100.0% of parolees (12 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Clarkesville, 14.3% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=7).
14.3%
Phase II sites running two program groups Statistic
Eighteen sites conducted two Cognitive Skills courses during Phase II.
18 sites
Experimental group prior drug sale convictions Statistic
Drug sale convictions were present in 42.0% of participants. Breakdown: none (58.0%), one (23.5%), two or more (18.6%). Mean was 0.7, median 0.0.
42%
Percentage who did not complete high school Statistic
65.4% of Phase II participants did not complete high school.
65.4%
Class size at session 30 Statistic
By session 30, classes reduced to between two to 20 participants. Even taking into consideration attrition, nearly half (40.4%) of the program groups exceeded the recommended class size of six.
40.4%
Program groups ranged from 6 to 28 offenders Statistic
Program groups formed through random assignment ranged in size from six to 28 offenders, with the typical class having 11 members.
11 offenders per class (typical)
LaFayette parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the LaFayette parole district, 90.0% of parolees (9 of 10) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
90%
Clarkesville experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Clarkesville was 106.6 (N=7).
106.6 IQ points
Phase II sites running three program groups Statistic
An additional eighteen sites ran three Cognitive Skills groups during Phase II.
18 sites
Experimental group prior sex crime convictions despite exclusion criteria Finding
Despite screening criteria to exclude sex offenders, 18 participants (3.0%) had histories of sex crime convictions; thirteen had only one sex crime conviction, but others had up to 10.
Percentage scoring below fifth grade reading level Statistic
26.4% of Phase II participants scored below a fifth grade reading level on the WRAT reading assessment.
26.4%
Program non-starter rate Statistic
80 (13.1%) of the 609 offenders assigned to the program did not start the Cognitive Skills Program.
13.1%
40.4% of groups exceeded appropriate class size at session 30 Statistic
Due to attrition, class sizes eventually reduced, but still 40.4% of the groups exceeded the appropriate class size at session 30.
40.4%
Brunswick parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Brunswick parole district, 100.0% of parolees (17 of 17) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group reading level Statistic
At Clarkesville, 28.6% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 71.4% read at 5th grade or above (N=7).
28.6%
Whitworth Detention Center program groups Statistic
Whitworth Detention Center held four Cognitive Skills groups during Phase II.
4 groups
Low-risk offenders included despite screening criteria Finding
Low risk offenders constitute half (50.8%) of the experimental group, despite screening criteria intended to exclude low-risk offenders. The report notes this is not surprising given that program screening was not aided by an actuarial risk assessme…
Average IQ of Phase II participants Statistic
The average IQ of Phase II participants was 100.8.
100.8 IQ points
Program dropout rate by session 30 Statistic
Of those who did begin the program, 24.1% were no longer participating in the program by the 30th class session.
24.1%
Phase II completion rate of 62.7% Statistic
Completion rates for Phase II were only slightly higher (62.7%) than those for Phase I (59.6%). Given that the Phase I outcome study found program completion to be a key component of program success, the report recommends stronger program attendance…
62.7% vs. Phase I completion rate
North Fulton parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the North Fulton parole district, 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Clarkesville experimental group was 1.1, with a median of 0.0 (N=7).
1.1 prior incarcerations
Phase II participant background data availability Statistic
Complete sets of social and demographic data derived from OTIS were available for 91.1% (N = 1087) of the randomly assigned sample.
91.1%
Participants with IQs below 80 included despite screening criteria Finding
For 48 (8.2%) of the experimental group, IQs were low enough (below 80) to call into question the appropriateness of their inclusion in the study, despite screening criteria excluding those with IQs below 80.
Percentage with IQs below 80 Statistic
8.2% of Phase II participants had IQs below 80.
8.2%
Overall program completion rate Phase II Statistic
A total of 382 (62.7%) of the experimental group completed the course. This total completion rate is comparable to Phase I where 59.6% finished the program.
62.7% vs. Phase I completion rate
Phase I completion rate of 59.6% Statistic
Phase I of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment had a completion rate of 59.6%.
59.6%
Cairo parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Cairo parole district, 100.0% of parolees (21 of 21) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Clarkesville experimental group was 4.1, with a median of 3.0 (N=7).
4.1 prior felony convictions
Phase II participant background data sample size Statistic
Complete sets of social and demographic data derived from OTIS were available for 1087 of the randomly assigned sample.
1,087 offenders
Substance abuse screening adherence problematic Finding
Determining the extent of adherence to the substance abuse screening criteria is somewhat problematic because available measures reflect prior rather than current substance use and do not systematically address severity. OTIS data state that 403 (66…
Percentage of single participants Statistic
Most Phase II participants (60.8%) were single.
60.8%
Completion rate range among program starters Statistic
Focusing only on those offenders who began the program, the completion rates range from 33% to 100% across program groups, with an average completion rate of around 72% (mean = 72.0%; median = 73.2%).
72%
Nearly 99% of participants rated coaches above neutral on social learning methods Statistic
Nearly 99% of participants rated coaches above neutral on the adherence to social learning methods scale, which encompasses the use of role playing and opportunities to practice skills during class meetings.
99%
Griffin parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Griffin parole district, 100.0% of parolees (9 of 9) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Clarkesville experimental group was 1.9, with a median of 0.0 (N=7).
1.9 prior violent convictions
Phase II criminal history data availability Statistic
Criminal history data were available for 98.2% (N = 1171) of the randomly assigned sample.
98.2%
Randomization procedures confirmed successful Finding
Chi square and T-test analyses comparing the control and experimental groups on each background characteristic showed great similarity between the two groups, confirming the integrity of the experimental design. None of the observed differences were…
Percentage with history of substance abuse Statistic
Slightly over half (56.8%) of Phase II participants were noted in Georgia's offender information tracking system (OTIS) files to have a history of substance abuse.
56.8%
Phase II completion rates more varied than Phase I Trend
Compared to the completion rates for Phase I, Phase II rates are more widely varied across program groups and higher on average.
97% of participants rated classes as relevant or very relevant Statistic
R&R received very favorable assessments regarding relevance; 97% of the participants rated the classes as relevant or very relevant.
97%
LaGrange parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district, 100.0% of parolees (9 of 9) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Clarkesville experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Clarkesville experimental group was 5.0, with a median of 3.0 (N=7).
5 prior property convictions
Phase II criminal history data sample size Statistic
Criminal history data were available for 1171 of the randomly assigned sample.
1,171 offenders
Phase I risk effect finding Finding
Rather than finding a 'risk effect' where higher risk offenders reap significantly greater benefits from treatment than low risk offenders, the Phase I study found that low and medium/high risk participants performed equally better than their contro…
Percentage classified as medium/high risk Statistic
Half (49.2%) of Phase II participants were classified by the study's risk score as medium/high risk.
49.2%
High participation levels in program Statistic
Approximately three-fourths of program participants averaged scores in the two highest categories of level of participation (attentive, responsive and attentive, volunteers; 75.5%).
75.5%
Class structure rated below mode for 41.3% of groups at session 17 Statistic
Observers assessed the area of 'general issues and class structure' as below the mode, or most frequent value, for 41.3% of program groups at session 17 and 22.2% at session 30.
41.3% vs. session 30
LaFayette parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the LaFayette parole district, 90.0% of parolees (9 of 10) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
90%
Clarkesville experimental group prior drug sale convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions for the Clarkesville experimental group was 0.4, with a median of 0.0 (N=7).
0.4 prior drug sale convictions
Jesness Inventory availability for experimental group Statistic
Jesness Inventories were available for 541 (88.8%) of the experimental group members.
88.8%
Risk measure correlation with OTIS score Methodology note
The modified Salient Factor Risk Score measure correlates strongly with the Georgia OTIS score among offenders with a risk score on record (gamma = .81, p
Percentage with multiple prior incarcerations Statistic
A slight majority (58.1%) of Phase II participants had been incarcerated multiple times including their last incarceration experience.
58.1%
High enjoyment levels in program Statistic
70.4% of program participants averaged scores in the two highest categories of enjoyment (expressed some enjoyment and expressed strong enjoyment).
70.4%
Sensitivity to participants' feelings rated as program strength Statistic
Observers reported that coaches in 78.3% of program groups at session 17 and 91.1% of program groups at session 30 met expectations in the area of 'sensitivity to participants' feelings,' which taps into coaches' skills related to empathy, confronta…
78.3% vs. session 30
Jefferson completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district, 66.7% of program participants (8 of 12) were still in the program at class 30, 16.7% (2) did not complete, and 16.7% (2) never began.
66.7%
Clarkesville experimental group prior drug possession convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions for the Clarkesville experimental group was 1.7, with a median of 1.0 (N=7).
1.7 prior drug possession convictions
Jesness Inventory count for experimental group Statistic
Jesness Inventories were available for 541 of the experimental group members.
541 inventories
OTIS risk measure missing data Data gap
The measure of risk available through OTIS contains a large amount of missing data (29.7%).
Percentage with prior parole revocations Statistic
Nearly half (44.1%) of Phase II participants had prior parole revocations in their history.
44.1%
High understanding levels in program Statistic
76.8% of program participants averaged scores in the two highest categories of understanding (understands, cannot offer examples and understands, can offer examples).
76.8%
Program administered according to theoretical design Finding
The report concludes that the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program is exceptional in correctional programming history because it was rated high on adherence to modeling, reinforcement, practice, and interpersonal sensitivity, strongly suggesting that R&…
South Dekalb completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the South Dekalb parole district, 36.8% of program participants (14 of 38) were still in the program at class 30, 28.9% (11) did not complete, and 34.2% (13) never began.
36.8%
Clarkesville experimental group prior sex crime convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions for the Clarkesville experimental group was 0.0, with a median of 0.0 (N=7).
0 prior sex crime convictions
Jesness Inventory undetermined personality types Statistic
Of the Jesness Inventories received, two yielded 'undetermined' personality types (0.04% of those received).
2 inventories
Salient Factor Risk Score modifications Methodology note
The research team modified three of the seven variables in the Salient Factor Score: juvenile convictions were unavailable (OTIS contains only adult records), employment/school attendance data were unavailable, and the alcohol/drug addiction measure…
Percentage with no prior felony convictions Statistic
Only one participant (.2%) had no felony convictions other than those leading to his last incarceration.
0.2%
Negative participation assessments in Phase II Finding
Unlike Phase I results where no participants averaged negative assessments, a small portion of Phase II participants fell below neutral on average level of participation (not attentive and attentive, yet wavered; 6.4%), enjoyment (expressed strong d…
Recommended class size of four to six members Finding
Well-implemented R&R programs should have classes that are small, between four and six members.
Lyons completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Lyons parole district, 55.6% of program participants (5 of 9) were still in the program at class 30, 44.4% (4) did not complete, and none never began.
55.6%
Clarkesville experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
At Clarkesville, 42.9% of the experimental group was classified as low risk and 57.1% as medium/high risk (N=7).
42.9%
Jesness Inventory scoring problems Statistic
82 (15.2% of those received) Jesness Inventories posed scoring problems due to missing or double responses on items.
82 inventories
Observer evaluation scale reliability Methodology note
Reliability analysis indicates high levels of internal consistency for each observer evaluation scale (Chronbach's alpha > .80). Observation 1 took place during session 17; Observation 2 during session 30.
Percentage with three or more prior felony convictions Statistic
48% of Phase II participants had three or more prior felony convictions.
48%
Group atmosphere ratings Statistic
According to coaches, the typical group atmosphere for 60.8% of the groups was 'cohesive,' and 27.5% of the groups were characterized as 'agreeable with some participation.' 11.8% averaged the neutral rating of 'listening, little active participatio…
60.8%
Screening criteria for R&R program participation Finding
Well-implemented R&R programs should exclude participants who are intellectually limited, severely substance abusing, or sex offenders, and should target higher risk offenders.
Statesboro completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Statesboro parole district, 55.6% of program participants (15 of 27) were still in the program at class 30, 25.9% (7) did not complete, and 18.5% (5) never began.
55.6%
Clarkesville experimental group prior parole revocation Statistic
At Clarkesville, 14.3% of the experimental group had a prior parole revocation (N=7).
14.3%
Jesness Inventory scoring problems percentage Statistic
15.2% of received Jesness Inventories posed scoring problems due to missing or double responses on items.
15.2%
Participant evaluation scale reliability Methodology note
The Chronbach's alpha for each participant evaluation scale is greater than .75. Factor 1 (Adherence to social learning methods) alpha = .85; Factor 2 (Relevance of skills to participant) alpha = .82; Factor 3 (Group climate) alpha = .78.
Percentage with prior property crime convictions Statistic
Property crime convictions were the most common prior conviction type among Phase II participants (72.4%).
72.4%
Skill application increase over program Trend
The proportion of program participants reported to be using previously taught skills increased throughout the program from 71.0% at time 1 to 94.3% at time 5. The increased proportions in use of skills from time 1 to time 5 are not an artifact of at…
South Metro completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the South Metro parole district, 66.7% of program participants (14 of 21) were still in the program at class 30, 33.3% (7) did not complete, and none never began.
66.7%
Dahlonega experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Dahlonega was 29.4 years (N=12).
29.4 years
Jesness Inventory problematic inventories fixed Statistic
Fifty-six (68.3%) of the 82 problematic Jesness inventories could be fixed through the scoring rules procedure.
56 inventories
Session evaluation data collection schedule Methodology note
Session evaluation data were collected at five different time periods (sessions 3, 9, 17, 22, and 30). Participation, enjoyment, understanding, and group atmosphere ratings were averaged across the five sessions. The use of previous skills measure i…
Percentage with prior drug possession convictions Statistic
62.0% of Phase II participants had prior drug possession convictions.
62%
Skill application at time 3 Statistic
At time 3, 92.7% of parolees (328 of 354) were reported to be using previously taught skills.
92.7%
Large classes impede coach management and participation Finding
Large classes can impede coaches' management of program sessions and discourage active class participation. Improvements in screening of offenders for inclusion into the program can have the added benefit of reducing the size of program groups.
South Richmond completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the South Richmond parole district, 63.2% of program participants (12 of 19) were still in the program at class 30, 21.1% (4) did not complete, and 15.8% (3) never began.
63.2%
Dahlonega experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Dahlonega, 100.0% of the experimental group was White (N=12).
100%
Jesness Inventory problematic inventories fixed percentage Statistic
68.3% of the 82 problematic Jesness inventories could be fixed through the scoring rules procedure.
68.3%
Observer evaluation scale structure Methodology note
Observers critiqued program sessions using a three-point scale (0 = needs improvement, 1 = satisfactory, 2 = very satisfactory) on 45 items forming five scales: general issues and class structure; organization; delivery and response to participant's…
Percentage with prior violent convictions Statistic
43.9% of Phase II participants had prior violent convictions.
43.9%
Lack of inter-rater reliability checks Data gap
Although all of the coaches received training on how to evaluate the participants, checks were not in place to ensure inter-rater reliability or consistency over time. The extent to which coaches across districts rated participants similarly is unkn…
Coaches reading from manual may indicate discomfort or unfamiliarity Finding
A substantial proportion of coaches were reported to be reading from the manual a good deal of the time (68.9% of participants indicated this), which may indicate some level of discomfort with their role or perhaps a lack of familiarity with the mat…
Jefferson parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district, 66.7% of parolees (4 of 6) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
66.7%
Dahlonega experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Dahlonega, 33.3% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=12).
33.3%
Jesness Inventory final scored count Statistic
In the end, a total of 513 (84.2%) Jesness Inventories generated personality types.
513 inventories
Participant evaluation instrument structure Methodology note
Program participants responded to 37 statements using a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Factor analysis identified three factors among twenty-one items: coaches' adherence to social learning methods, relevance of the s…
Percentage with prior drug sale convictions Statistic
42.0% of Phase II participants had prior drug sale convictions.
42%
Coaches rating all participants identically Methodology note
Some coaches rated all class participants in the group the same, as evidenced by all offenders in a group having the same average scores on a session characteristic. While it is possible that all participants in a group performed similarly at a give…
Conclusive interpretation requires linkage to outcomes Methodology note
A conclusive interpretation of the programmatic data is not entirely possible until they are linked to outcomes; the different levels of implementation must be examined in conjunction with follow-up data to determine precisely what scale scores tran…
South Dekalb parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the South Dekalb parole district, 0.0% of parolees (0 of 20) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
0%
Dahlonega experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Dahlonega was 105.5 (N=11).
105.5 IQ points
Jesness Inventory final scored percentage Statistic
84.2% of Jesness Inventories generated personality types after scoring procedures.
84.2%
Program completion categorization Methodology note
Members of the experimental group are categorized as 1) never beginning the program, 2) beginning the program but not completing it, or 3) being in the program at the 30th class session (i.e., completed the program).
Number of participants with sex crime conviction histories Statistic
Despite screening criteria to exclude sex offenders, 18 participants (3.0%) in the experimental group had histories of sex crime convictions.
18 participants
Coaches not discriminating between evaluation dimensions Methodology note
In many instances coaches did not discriminate between items pertaining to understanding, enjoyment, and participation, rating participants the same on each of the dimensions.
Participant evaluation scales derived from 21 of 37 items Methodology note
Participants rated the program on 37 items using a 1-5 scale. Three scales derived from 21 of the items depict participants' experiences in coaches' adherence to social learning methods, relevance of skills, and group climate.
Lyons parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Lyons parole district, 87.5% of parolees (7 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
87.5%
Dahlonega experimental group reading level Statistic
At Dahlonega, 18.2% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 81.8% read at 5th grade or above (N=11).
18.2%
Session evaluation data availability Statistic
Session evaluations of at least two of the five sessions were available for only 486 (79.8%) program participants.
486 participants
Georgia Cognitive Skills Program screening criteria Policy
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Program is to exclude offenders who a) are low risk, b) have sex crime histories, c) are afflicted by severe substance abuse, and d) have IQs below 80.
Percentage with sex crime conviction histories Statistic
3.0% of Phase II experimental group participants had histories of sex crime convictions despite screening criteria to exclude sex offenders.
3%
Observer-rated program strengths Finding
Observers rated 'sensitivity to participant's feelings' (e.g., respect for participants and skill in identifying participants' feelings, beliefs, thoughts, or attitudes) and 'group participation' (e.g., engagement of most rather than some participan…
Single items less reliable than scales Methodology note
The statistics for the single items (such as 'coaches read from manual') are less reliable than the scales because they are more prone to random error. When individual items are combined to create a scale, the error tends to average out, making the …
Statesboro parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Statesboro parole district, 86.7% of parolees (13 of 15) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
86.7%
Dahlonega experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Dahlonega experimental group was 0.8, with a median of 0.0 (N=12).
0.8 prior incarcerations
Session evaluation data availability percentage Statistic
Session evaluations of at least two of the five sessions were available for 79.8% of program participants.
79.8%
Jesness Inventory I-level classification system Methodology note
The Jesness Inventory places offenders into one of three levels of interpersonal maturity: I-level 2 through I-level 4. I-level assesses how individuals perceive the world, particularly in terms of emotions and motivations.
Percentage classified as I-level 2 Statistic
Very few members of the Phase II experimental group were classified as I-level 2s (4.9%).
4.9%
Areas with most room for improvement Finding
Areas of implementation that vary the most from program to program are 'general issues and class structure,' 'organization,' and 'delivery and response to participant's use of skills.' These three areas also were considered to have the most room for…
Women participated primarily in institutional setting Methodology note
Women participated in the program primarily in an institutional setting. For this reason, comparisons across sexes are limited to male participants in institutional settings.
South Metro parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the South Metro parole district, 76.5% of parolees (13 of 17) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
76.5%
Dahlonega experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Dahlonega experimental group was 3.0, with a median of 2.0 (N=12).
3 prior felony convictions
Observer evaluation of session 17 Statistic
Of the 52 study groups, observers evaluated 46 (88.5%) of the 17th sessions.
46 sessions
Jesness Inventory personality types Methodology note
The JI contains 11 empirically-derived personality scales and nine subtype scales that can be collapsed into four personality types: aggressives, neurotics, dependents, and situationals.
Percentage classified as I-level 3 Statistic
The majority of Phase II experimental group members were classified as I-level 3s (55.2%).
55.2%
Improvement across all five implementation areas Trend
Improvements were noted in all five implementation areas from the first to second observations; the percent of program groups rated below the modal score at the second observation was lower than at the first observation on all five scales.
Participant evaluation variation will allow treatment effect analysis Methodology note
The variation in scale and item scores will allow for the examination of whether participants who rated the program more favorably reap the greatest benefits.
South Richmond parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the South Richmond parole district, 41.7% of parolees (5 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
41.7%
Dahlonega experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Dahlonega experimental group was 1.0, with a median of 0.0 (N=12).
1 prior violent convictions
Observer evaluation of session 17 percentage Statistic
88.5% of the 17th sessions were evaluated by observers.
88.5%
Control group comparison on marital status Finding
Slightly more of the control group were single (experimental = 60.7%; control = 65.7%), but the difference was not statistically significant.
Percentage classified as I-level 4 Statistic
I-level 4s made up 40.0% of the Phase II experimental group.
40%
Observer rating scale distribution Methodology note
The ratings available to the observers included 0 = needs improvement, 1 = satisfactory, and 2 = very satisfactory. Between 43.5% and 91.1% of the program groups received the highest possible ratings. The rating of 2 is the modal, or most frequent s…
Phase II more descriptive of program quality than Phase I Methodology note
The Phase II process evaluation is considerably more descriptive of program quality compared to Phase I. In addition to describing study participants by their background and historical characteristics, Phase II considers participants' psychological …
Jefferson parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district, 66.7% of parolees (4 of 6) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
66.7%
Dahlonega experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Dahlonega experimental group was 1.8, with a median of 0.0 (N=12).
1.8 prior property convictions
Observer evaluation of session 30 Statistic
Of the 52 study groups, observers evaluated 45 (86.5%) of the 30th sessions.
45 sessions
Control group comparison on employment Finding
Slightly more of the control group were employed full time (experimental = 49.1%; control = 54.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant.
Percentage classified as Aggressives Statistic
More of the Phase II experimental group were classified as Aggressives (32.2%) than the other three Jesness Inventory types.
32.2%
Session 17 observer ratings below mode Statistic
At session 17, around half of the program groups were in need of improvement in the areas of 'general issues and class structure' (41.3%), 'organization' (56.5%), and 'delivery and response to participant's use of skills' (41.3%). Less than a quarte…
56.5%
Coaches should demonstrate empathy, prosocial conflict resolution, and assertiveness Finding
Because modeling is an essential component of the learning process, coaches must demonstrate empathy, prosocial conflict resolution, and assertiveness.
South Dekalb parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the South Dekalb parole district, 90.9% of parolees (10 of 11) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
90.9%
Dahlonega experimental group prior drug sale convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions for the Dahlonega experimental group was 0.7, with a median of 0.0 (N=12).
0.7 prior drug sale convictions
Observer evaluation of session 30 percentage Statistic
86.5% of the 30th sessions were evaluated by observers.
86.5%
Control group comparison on education Finding
Slightly more of the control group had no high school education (experimental = 8.6%; control = 12.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant.
Percentage classified as Dependents Statistic
Dependents made up 27.9% of the Phase II experimental group.
27.9%
Session 30 observer ratings below mode Statistic
By session 30, over three-fourths of the groups met observers' standards on 'general issues and class structure,' 'organization,' and 'delivery and response to participant's use of skills.' The vast majority of the groups reached observers' standard…
91.1%
GBPP should consider attendance and completion requirements Finding
The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles might benefit from the implementation of program attendance and completion requirements, given that program completion was found to be a key component of program success in Phase I.
Lyons parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Lyons parole district, 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Dahlonega experimental group prior drug possession convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions for the Dahlonega experimental group was 1.2, with a median of 1.0 (N=12).
1.2 prior drug possession convictions
Participant evaluation form response count Statistic
Two hundred and sixty-two offenders (43.0% of those assigned to the experimental group, and 68.6% of those who completed the program) contributed participant evaluation forms.
262 offenders
Total study sample size Statistic
The total study sample (experimental plus control) was 1,171 participants, with 597 in the experimental group and 574 in the control group.
1,171 participants
Percentage classified as Situationals Statistic
Situationals made up 22.4% of the Phase II experimental group.
22.4%
Missing observer evaluations Data gap
Six program groups (11.5%) were not observed at session 17, and seven (13.5%) were not observed at session 30.
Class sessions should incorporate behavioral processes Finding
Well-implemented R&R class sessions should incorporate behavioral processes including role modeling, role playing, graduated rehearsal, and reinforcement.
Statesboro parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Statesboro parole district, 100.0% of parolees (14 of 14) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Dahlonega experimental group prior sex crime convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions for the Dahlonega experimental group was 0.0, with a median of 0.0 (N=12).
0 prior sex crime convictions
Participant evaluation form response rate of experimental group Statistic
43.0% of those assigned to the experimental group contributed participant evaluation forms.
43%
Control group average age Statistic
The control group average age was 32.0, compared to 32.2 for the experimental group.
32 years vs. experimental group average age
Percentage classified as Neurotics Statistic
Neurotics made up 17.5% of the Phase II experimental group.
17.5%
Observer bias in scoring Methodology note
Chi square analysis comparing the proportion of groups that received perfect scores and were evaluated by one particular observer to those groups that received perfect scores and were evaluated by the combined group of all other observers yields sta…
Coaches should evidence skill in controlling class sessions Finding
Well-implemented R&R programs require coaches who evidence skill in controlling the class sessions and possess strong interpersonal skills.
South Metro parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the South Metro parole district, 100.0% of parolees (12 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Dahlonega experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
At Dahlonega, 66.7% of the experimental group was classified as low risk and 33.3% as medium/high risk (N=12).
66.7%
Participant evaluation form response rate of program completers Statistic
68.6% of those who completed the program contributed participant evaluation forms.
68.6%
Control group racial composition Statistic
The control group was 70.0% nonwhite and 30.0% white, compared to 68.5% nonwhite and 31.5% white in the experimental group.
70% vs. experimental group nonwhite percent
Percentage of low risk offenders in experimental group Statistic
Low risk offenders constitute half (50.8%) of the Phase II experimental group.
50.8%
Number of observers in evaluation Statistic
One of the 11 observers performed the majority of the evaluations.
11 observers
Unequally sized experimental and control groups at some sites Methodology note
The randomization procedures were employed successfully, with a caveat pertaining to some sites having unequally sized experimental and control groups.
South Richmond parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the South Richmond parole district, 81.8% of parolees (9 of 11) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
81.8%
Dahlonega experimental group prior parole revocation Statistic
At Dahlonega, 25.0% of the experimental group had a prior parole revocation (N=12).
25%
R&R program structure Finding
The Reasoning and Rehabilitation program is structured into 35 lessons that cover seven key components: problem-solving, creative thinking, social skills, management of emotions, negotiation skills, values enhancement, and critical reasoning.
R&R recommended class size Finding
Ross, Fabiano, and Ross (1989) specify that R&R classes should range in size from four to six members.
Control group gender distribution Statistic
The control group was 92.0% male and 8.0% female, compared to 91.3% male and 8.7% female in the experimental group.
92% vs. experimental group male percent
Number of experimental group members with IQs below 80 Statistic
For 48 (8.2%) of the Phase II experimental group, IQs were low enough (below 80) to call into question the appropriateness of their inclusion in the study.
48 offenders
No inter-observer reliability measures Data gap
There are no measures of inter-observer reliability in the observer evaluation data. It is possible that the variation in scores reflects differences in how observers assessed the groups.
Jefferson parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district, 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Milledgeville experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Milledgeville was 32.5 years (N=20).
32.5 years
Phase II screening criteria Finding
Phase II study participants were selected based on the following criteria: high-risk for reoffending, IQ scores of at least 80, no history of sexual offending, and absence of substance abuse problems so severe as to interfere with their ability to a…
Maximum prior sex crime convictions among participants Statistic
Thirteen of the 18 experimental group members with sex crime histories had only one sex crime conviction in their record, but others had up to 10.
10 convictions
No normed cutoff points for observer instrument Data gap
The instrument used for the evaluation of the program sessions has not been normed, and hence established cutoff points indicating the level of proficiency required to translate into more effective program outcomes have not been determined.
South Dekalb parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the South Dekalb parole district, 83.3% of parolees (10 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
83.3%
Milledgeville experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Milledgeville, 10.0% of the experimental group was White and 90.0% was nonwhite (N=20).
90%
Phase II minimum supervision time requirement Finding
Study participants were to have at least 16 months remaining under supervision to ensure adequate time to complete the four-month program and to be monitored for an additional 12 months thereafter.
Percentage of experimental group with 8+ prior property convictions Statistic
Chi square analysis indicates that a greater proportion of the experimental group had eight or more prior property convictions (experimental = 23.3%; control = 19.0%; p < .05).
23.3% vs. control group percentage
Completion as predictor of criminal involvement Finding
Whether program participants complete the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program has shown in Phase I to be an important predictor of later criminal involvement (Van Voorhis et al., 2001).
Lyons parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Lyons parole district, 100.0% of parolees (4 of 4) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Milledgeville experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Milledgeville, 65.0% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=20).
65%
Phase II program duration Finding
The Cognitive Skills Program is a four-month program.
Median prior property convictions for both groups Statistic
The median number of prior property convictions for both the experimental and control groups was two.
2 convictions
Attrition not related to early skill application Finding
There are no statistically significant differences in the application of skills early on in the program for those who eventually dropped out compared to those who completed the program; participants who did not apply the skills early in the program …
Statesboro parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Statesboro parole district, 100.0% of parolees (13 of 13) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Milledgeville experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Milledgeville was 98.5 (N=20).
98.5 IQ points
Phase I dropouts recidivated at highest rates Finding
Dropouts consistently recidivated at the highest rates across configurations of the study groups in Phase I.
Class size range at program start Statistic
From six to 28 offenders were assigned to Phase II program groups at the start of the program.
28 offenders vs. minimum class size
Outcome evaluation sensitivity analysis planned Methodology note
In the outcome evaluation report, analyses will be run both with and without the 15 sites with unequal experimental and control groups to determine if they affect the results.
South Metro parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the South Metro parole district, 76.9% of parolees (10 of 13) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
76.9%
Milledgeville experimental group reading level Statistic
At Milledgeville, 55.0% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 45.0% read at 5th grade or above (N=20).
55%
Phase I high-risk parolees elevated recidivism risk Finding
Across configurations of the study groups, high-risk parolees were at an elevated risk of recidivating in Phase I.
Mean class size at program start Statistic
The mean class size for Phase II program groups was 12 offenders.
12 offenders
Higher ratio assignment to experimental group Methodology note
The need for sufficient experimental group size caused staff to assign offenders to groups according to a higher ratio than fifty percent.
South Richmond parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the South Richmond parole district, 75.0% of parolees (6 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
75%
Milledgeville experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Milledgeville experimental group was 1.7, with a median of 1.0 (N=20).
1.7 prior incarcerations
Phase I high-risk differential benefit not supported Finding
Analysis did not support the hypothesis that high-risk class participants would benefit from the program more than low risk participants in Phase I.
Median class size at program start Statistic
The median class size for Phase II program groups was 10 offenders.
10 offenders
Total experimental groups in Phase II Statistic
A total of 52 experimental groups participated in Phase II of the evaluation. One group did not report on group atmosphere.
52 experimental groups
Hartwell completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Hartwell parole district, 88.9% of program participants (16 of 18) were still in the program at class 30, 11.1% (2) did not complete, and none never began.
88.9%
Milledgeville experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Milledgeville experimental group was 3.3, with a median of 2.5 (N=20).
3.3 prior felony convictions
Phase I low risk parolees also benefit from R&R Finding
The Phase I outcome study revealed that low risk parolees also benefit from R&R.
Class size range by session 30 Statistic
By session 30, Phase II classes reduced to between two and 20 participants.
20 participants vs. minimum class size at session 30
Experimental group total sample size Statistic
The experimental group total was 609 participants (based on completion data in Table 10); the control group total was 574; the combined total was 1171 (based on Table 7 criminal background data).
609 experimental group participants vs. control group participants
Coastal State Prison completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
At Coastal State Prison, 91.7% of program participants (11 of 12) were still in the program at class 30, 8.3% (1) did not complete, and none never began.
91.7%
Milledgeville experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Milledgeville experimental group was 1.7, with a median of 0.5 (N=20).
1.7 prior violent convictions
Phase I random assignment integrity confirmed Finding
Analysis confirmed the integrity of random assignment in Phase I of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment.
Percentage of classes exceeding recommended size at session 30 Statistic
Even taking into consideration attrition, nearly half (40.4%) of the Phase II program groups exceeded the recommended class size of six at session 30.
40.4%
IQ range distribution in sample Statistic
Of the total study sample (1149), 7.7% had IQ scores of 50-80, 35.9% had IQ scores of 81-99, 41.7% had IQ scores of 100-115, and 14.6% had IQ scores of 116-139.
41.7%
Whitworth Detention Center completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
At Whitworth Detention Center, 95.0% of program participants (38 of 40) were still in the program at class 30, 5.0% (2) did not complete, and none never began.
95%
Milledgeville experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Milledgeville experimental group was 6.2, with a median of 2.5 (N=20).
6.2 prior property convictions
Percentage of classes exceeding recommended size at program start Statistic
The majority of classes (76.9%) exceeded the recommended maximum of six offenders per group at the beginning of the program.
76.9%
Risk level distribution in sample Statistic
Of the total study sample (1151), 52.9% were classified as low risk and 47.1% as medium/high risk.
52.9% vs. percent medium/high risk
Metro State Prison completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
At Metro State Prison, 51.9% of program participants (27 of 52) were still in the program at class 30, 44.2% (23) did not complete, and 3.8% (2) never began.
51.9%
Milledgeville experimental group prior drug sale convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions for the Milledgeville experimental group was 0.7, with a median of 0.0 (N=20).
0.7 prior drug sale convictions
Percentage of experimental group who did not start program Statistic
Eighty (13.1%) of the offenders assigned to the Phase II program did not start.
13.1%
Hartwell parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
In the Hartwell parole district, 100.0% of parolees (18 of 18) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Milledgeville experimental group prior drug possession convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions for the Milledgeville experimental group was 1.7, with a median of 1.0 (N=20).
1.7 prior drug possession convictions
R&R implementation sites since 1997 Statistic
Since 1997, a total of 30 parole districts and three correctional institutions administered R&R to offenders in Georgia.
30 parole districts
Number of experimental group who did not start program Statistic
Eighty offenders assigned to the Phase II program did not start.
80 offenders
Coastal State Prison parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
At Coastal State Prison, 63.6% of parolees (7 of 11) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
63.6%
Milledgeville experimental group prior sex crime convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions for the Milledgeville experimental group was 0.0, with a median of 0.0 (N=20).
0 prior sex crime convictions
R&R implementation correctional institutions since 1997 Statistic
Since 1997, three correctional institutions administered R&R to offenders in Georgia.
3 institutions
Percentage who dropped out by session 30 Statistic
Of those who did begin the Phase II program, 24.1% were no longer participating in the program by the 30th class session.
24.1%
Whitworth Detention Center parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
At Whitworth Detention Center, 28.9% of parolees (11 of 38) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
28.9%
Milledgeville experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
At Milledgeville, 35.0% of the experimental group was classified as low risk and 65.0% as medium/high risk (N=20).
35%
Phase II observer group composition Statistic
The group of observers consisted of 11 cognitive coaches who previously ran more than three groups of classes and attended in-service training related to the observation process.
11 coaches
Phase II program completion rate Statistic
A total of 382 (62.7%) of the Phase II experimental group completed the course.
62.7%
Metro State Prison parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
At Metro State Prison, 94.7% of parolees (18 of 19) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
94.7%
Milledgeville experimental group prior parole revocation Statistic
At Milledgeville, 70.0% of the experimental group had a prior parole revocation (N=20).
70%
Phase II data collection methods Methodology note
Staff of the GBPP collected data for the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment by extracting data from Georgia's offender information tracking system (OTIS), administering questionnaires to the program participants, and recording observations of the p…
Number of Phase II program completers Statistic
A total of 382 members of the Phase II experimental group completed the course.
382 offenders
Hartwell parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
In the Hartwell parole district, 100.0% of parolees (14 of 14) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Thomas experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Thomas was 29.0 years (N=10).
29 years
Jesness Inventory scoring rules Methodology note
Scoring rules were created at the University of Cincinnati where staff would assign a response to items under specific conditions: inventories would remain unscored if four or more of the 155 items were not marked sufficiently; if multiple problemat…
Phase I program completion rate Statistic
The Phase I program completion rate was 59.6%.
59.6%
Coastal State Prison parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
At Coastal State Prison, 66.7% of parolees (8 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
66.7%
Thomas experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Thomas, 20.0% of the experimental group was White and 80.0% was nonwhite (N=10).
80%
Jesness Inventory item count Statistic
The Jesness Inventory is a 155-item true/false inventory.
155 items
Completion rate range across program groups Statistic
Focusing only on those offenders who began the Phase II program, completion rates ranged from 33% to 100% across program groups.
100% vs. minimum completion rate
Whitworth Detention Center parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
At Whitworth Detention Center, 94.7% of parolees (36 of 38) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
94.7%
Thomas experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Thomas, 20.0% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=10).
20%
Phase II session evaluation form collection Methodology note
GBPP staff sent to the University of Cincinnati session evaluation forms from five sessions (the same sessions for each group), spanning the full cognitive skills course and representing five of the sections taught in the course (problem-solving, cr…
Mean completion rate among program starters Statistic
The average completion rate among those who began the Phase II program was approximately 72% (mean = 72.0%).
72%
Metro State Prison parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
At Metro State Prison, 78.6% of parolees (22 of 28) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
78.6%
Thomas experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Thomas was 98.7 (N=10).
98.7 IQ points
Phase II observer evaluation sessions Methodology note
At two points during the delivery of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program for each program group (sessions 17 and 30), observers attended class sessions to assess the effectiveness of the coaches.
Median completion rate among program starters Statistic
The median completion rate among those who began the Phase II program was 73.2%.
73.2%
Hartwell parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
In the Hartwell parole district, 100.0% of parolees (12 of 12) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Thomas experimental group reading level Statistic
At Thomas, 50.0% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 50.0% read at 5th grade or above (N=10).
50%
Phase II IQ assessment instrument Methodology note
The Culture Fair Intelligence Test (Cattell & Cattell, 1973) was used to assess study participants' IQ.
Percentage reporting coaches read from manual a good deal of time Statistic
68.9% of the Phase II program participants indicated that the coaches read from the manual a good deal of the time.
68.9%
Coastal State Prison parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
At Coastal State Prison, 100.0% of parolees (10 of 10) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Thomas experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Thomas experimental group was 1.5, with a median of 1.0 (N=10).
1.5 prior incarcerations
Thomas experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Thomas experimental group was 1.8, with a median of 2.0 (N=10).
1.8 prior felony convictions
Phase II reading level assessment instrument Methodology note
Reading level was assessed using the Wide-Range Achievement Test.
Percentage of classes rated less than satisfactory on class structure at session 17 Statistic
The area of 'general issues and class structure' was assessed as less than satisfactory for 41.3% of program groups at session 17.
41.3%
Whitworth Detention Center parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
At Whitworth Detention Center, 100.0% of parolees (38 of 38) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Thomas experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Thomas experimental group was 1.3, with a median of 0.0 (N=10).
1.3 prior violent convictions
Phase II psychological classification levels Methodology note
Psychological classification of offenders into three levels of interpersonal maturity and four personality types was achieved using the Jesness Inventory.
Percentage of classes rated less than satisfactory on class structure at session 30 Statistic
The area of 'general issues and class structure' was assessed as less than satisfactory for 22.2% of program groups at session 30.
22.2%
Metro State Prison parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
At Metro State Prison, 81.0% of parolees (17 of 21) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
81%
Thomas experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Thomas experimental group was 2.3, with a median of 2.0 (N=10).
2.3 prior property convictions
Phase II participant evaluation form content Methodology note
Items on the participant evaluation form tapped into the participants' perceptions of the coaches' teaching methods, the relevance of the class material to their own lives, and the climate of the class.
Percentage of coaches meeting interpersonal skills expectations at session 17 Statistic
Observers reported that coaches in 78.3% of program groups at session 17 met expectations in prosocial interpersonal skills.
78.3%
Program groups without comparison groups: completion rate Statistic
Across all program groups without comparison groups, 79.6% of participants (78 of 98) were still in the program at class 30, 16.3% (16) did not complete, and 4.1% (4) never began.
79.6%
Thomas experimental group prior drug sale convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions for the Thomas experimental group was 0.4, with a median of 0.0 (N=10).
0.4 prior drug sale convictions
Phase II session evaluation form content Methodology note
At the end of each class session, coaches completed a 'session evaluation form' for the group of participants that rates each parolee's level of participation, level of enjoyment, level of understanding, and use of skills taught in earlier sessions,…
Percentage of coaches meeting interpersonal skills expectations at session 30 Statistic
Observers reported that coaches in 91.1% of program groups at session 30 met expectations in prosocial interpersonal skills.
91.1%
Program groups without comparison groups: parolees using skills at time 1 Statistic
Across all program groups without comparison groups, 80.2% of parolees (65 of 81) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
80.2%
Thomas experimental group prior drug possession convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions for the Thomas experimental group was 1.2, with a median of 1.0 (N=10).
1.2 prior drug possession convictions
Phase II observer evaluation content Methodology note
Coaches' skills under examination in observer evaluations include class structure issues, organization of the class session, coaches' delivery and response to participant's use of skills, sensitivity to participants' feelings, and group participatio…
Percentage rating classes as relevant or very relevant Statistic
Participants strongly endorsed the relevance of the lessons to their daily lives; 97.2% rated the classes as relevant or very relevant.
97.2%
Program groups without comparison groups: parolees using skills at time 3 Statistic
Across all program groups without comparison groups, 86.7% of parolees (52 of 60) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
86.7%
Thomas experimental group prior sex crime convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions for the Thomas experimental group was 0.0, with a median of 0.0 (N=10).
0 prior sex crime convictions
Phase II random assignment procedure Methodology note
After identifying offenders eligible for the study, parole and corrections officers sent the lists of study participants to the evaluation unit in Atlanta for random assignment to either the experimental or the comparison group.
Percentage of experimental group inappropriate for program Statistic
Due to the inclusion of offenders with low cognitive ability and of sex offenders, 10.2% of the Phase II experimental group were inappropriate for the program.
10.2%
Program groups without comparison groups: parolees using skills at time 5 Statistic
Across all program groups without comparison groups, 94.4% of parolees (67 of 71) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
94.4%
Thomas experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
At Thomas, 20.0% of the experimental group was classified as low risk and 80.0% as medium/high risk (N=10).
20%
Phase II participant background data sources Methodology note
Information obtained during offenders' prison intake and diagnostic interviews, and subsequently entered into OTIS, provided background measures of social and demographic characteristics. OTIS also furnished data pertaining to the criminal histories…
Percentage of experimental group inappropriate including low risk Statistic
If the 299 low risk offenders are added to the pool of inappropriate participants, over half of the Phase II experimental group (54%) can be considered inappropriate.
54%
Program groups without comparison groups: average group atmosphere Statistic
Across program groups without comparison groups, 70.0% of groups (7 of 10) were rated as having a cohesive, participating group atmosphere, and 30.0% (3 of 10) were rated as agreeable with some participation.
70%
Thomas experimental group prior parole revocation Statistic
At Thomas, 70.0% of the experimental group had a prior parole revocation (N=10).
70%
Phase II Jesness Inventory administration timing Methodology note
GBPP staff administered the 155-item true/false inventories to the experimental and control groups at the beginning of the Cognitive Skills Program.
Number of low risk offenders in experimental group Statistic
There were 299 low risk offenders in the Phase II experimental group.
299 offenders
Savannah experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Savannah was 29.0 years (N=14).
29 years
Phase II Jesness Inventory scoring software Methodology note
Staff at the University of Cincinnati scored the inventories using The Jesness Inventory Computer Program Windows Version (1996) software.
Georgia Cognitive Skills Program is first statewide R&R for parolees Finding
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Program is the first known statewide effort to employ cognitive skills training with parolees.
Dahlonega completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Dahlonega parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 54.4% of participants (6 of 11) were still in the program at class 30, 45.5% (5) did not complete, and none never began.
54.4%
Savannah experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Savannah, 7.1% of the experimental group was White and 92.9% was nonwhite (N=14).
92.9%
Phase II study period Finding
Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment ran from July 1998 to April 2000.
R&R program implementation began in 1997 Finding
Implementation of R&R in Georgia began in 1997 with the training of parole officers to perform as cognitive coaches.
Fitzgerald completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Fitzgerald parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 72.7% of participants (8 of 11) were still in the program at class 30, 9.1% (1) did not complete, and 18.2% (2) never began.
72.7%
Savannah experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Savannah, 57.1% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=14).
57.1%
Phase I conclusion date Finding
The first phase of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment concluded in July of 1998.
Approximately 50 parole officers trained as cognitive coaches Statistic
Beginning in 1997, Elizabeth Fabiano and Frank Porporino, authorities in cognitive skills programming, trained approximately 50 parole officers across the state of Georgia, with retrainings held as needed.
50 parole officers
Columbus completion rate: still in at class 30 Statistic
In the Columbus parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 75.0% of participants (6 of 8) were still in the program at class 30, 12.5% (1) did not complete, and 12.5% (1) never began.
75%
Savannah experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Savannah was 104.2 (N=14).
104.2 IQ points
Phase I produced two reports Finding
The first phase of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment produced two reports: a process evaluation and an outcome evaluation.
Total districts and institutions administering R&R Statistic
Since implementation began, a total of 30 parole districts and three correctional institutions administered R&R to offenders in Georgia.
30 parole districts
LaGrange completion rate: still in at class 30 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 88.9% of participants (16 of 18) were still in the program at class 30, 5.6% (1) did not complete, and 5.6% (1) never began.
88.9%
Savannah experimental group reading level Statistic
At Savannah, 21.4% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 78.6% read at 5th grade or above (N=14).
21.4%
Phase I process evaluation content Finding
The Phase I process evaluation (Van Voorhis, Murphy, & Johnson, 1999) assessed components of program implementation and adherence to the experimental design, presenting a description of the population served, program completion figures, coaches' rep…
Offenders not screened into program as carefully as possible Finding
Offenders were not screened into the Phase II program as carefully as they might have been.
Jefferson completion rate: still in at class 30 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 90.9% of participants (10 of 11) were still in the program at class 30, 9.1% (1) did not complete, and none never began.
90.9%
Savannah experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Savannah experimental group was 1.2, with a median of 0.5 (N=14).
1.2 prior incarcerations
Phase I process evaluation recommendations Finding
Recommendations and concerns raised in the Phase I process evaluation report pertained to screening procedures, subject retention, and accuracy of recording data.
Low risk offenders may not be detrimentally affected Finding
If the results from the Phase I outcome study hold for Phase II, the inclusion of low risk offenders may not be a detrimental oversight.
Lyons completion rate: still in at class 30 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Lyons parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 86.4% of participants (19 of 22) were still in the program at class 30, 13.6% (3) did not complete, and none never began.
86.4%
Savannah experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Savannah experimental group was 2.5, with a median of 2.0 (N=14).
2.5 prior felony convictions
Phase II design improvements over Phase I Finding
Phase II of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment meets Palmer's (1991) standards by employing an experimental design; reproducing the Phase I analysis on a new sample of parolees; varying circumstances of the Phase I study by adding three institu…
Data gap in assessing substance abuse currency and severity Data gap
Available data do not afford a way of assessing the currency or severity of substance abuse among Phase II participants. Substantial portions of the offenders showed prior histories of drug and alcohol-related offenses, but the extent of the offende…
Dahlonega parolees using skills at time 1 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Dahlonega parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Savannah experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Savannah experimental group was 0.7, with a median of 0.0 (N=14).
0.7 prior violent convictions
Phase II includes female offenders Finding
Phase II varied circumstances of the Phase I study by including female offenders in the sample.
Program screening not aided by eligibility assessments Finding
With the exception of IQ, program screening was not aided by assessments pertaining to eligibility criteria. Especially with respect to offender risk, such assessments would greatly assist efforts to assure that the program was administered to appro…
Fitzgerald parolees using skills at time 1 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Fitzgerald parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (9 of 9) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Savannah experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Savannah experimental group was 3.1, with a median of 0.0 (N=14).
3.1 prior property convictions
R&R program theoretical basis Finding
R&R provides training to modify offenders' impulsive, egocentric, illogical and rigid thinking patterns, sharing assumptions common to the larger field of cognitive-behavioral psychology.
Randomization procedures implemented successfully Finding
Analyses reveal great similarity between the experimental and control groups, confirming the integrity of the experimental design. Only one statistically significant difference exists between the two groups.
Columbus parolees using skills at time 1 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Columbus parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 0.0% of parolees (0 of 7) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
0%
Savannah experimental group prior drug sale convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug sale convictions for the Savannah experimental group was 0.9, with a median of 1.0 (N=14).
0.9 prior drug sale convictions
R&R program specific objectives Finding
Specific objectives of the R&R program include improving offenders' interpersonal problem-solving, consequential thinking, means-end reasoning, social perspective-taking, critical and abstract reasoning, and creative thinking.
Group distributions nearly identical on background characteristics Finding
Group distributions were nearly identical (differences less than four percent) on background characteristics including age, race, social class, substance abuse, IQ, reading level, prior incarcerations, felony convictions, violent convictions, drug s…
LaGrange parolees using skills at time 1 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (15 of 15) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
100%
Savannah experimental group prior drug possession convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior drug possession convictions for the Savannah experimental group was 1.6, with a median of 1.0 (N=14).
1.6 prior drug possession convictions
R&R program activities Finding
R&R program activities include role-playing, thinking games, homework assignments, and group discussions.
Nearly all program groups exceeded recommended class size Finding
Nearly all of the program groups created through the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program exceeded the recommended class size of four to six members.
Jefferson parolees using skills at time 1 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 44.4% of parolees (4 of 9) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
44.4%
Savannah experimental group prior sex crime convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior sex crime convictions for the Savannah experimental group was 0.1, with a median of 0.0 (N=14).
0.1 prior sex crime convictions
R&R coaches handbook purpose Finding
The coaches' handbook (Ross, Fabiano, and Ross, 1989) attempts to foster consistency across program sites, providing detailed lesson plans and techniques for running the program sessions.
Some program groups intentionally large in anticipation of dropout Finding
Some Phase II program groups were intentionally large in anticipation of individuals dropping out of the program.
Lyons parolees using skills at time 1 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Lyons parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 85.7% of parolees (18 of 21) were reported to be using skills at time 1.
85.7%
Savannah experimental group risk level distribution Statistic
At Savannah, 50.0% of the experimental group was classified as low risk and 50.0% as medium/high risk (N=14).
50%
R&R coach expectations Finding
Coaches are expected to possess the social and cognitive skills targeted through the program, providing models for the offenders to emulate, and are instructed to reinforce participants' demonstration of skills as well as their effort.
Coaches' perceptions of program largely positive Finding
Coaches' perceptions of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program were largely positive in terms of offenders' level of participation, enjoyment, and understanding.
Dahlonega parolees using skills at time 3 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Dahlonega parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Savannah experimental group prior parole revocation Statistic
At Savannah, 35.7% of the experimental group had a prior parole revocation (N=14).
35.7%
R&R class atmosphere goal Finding
The curriculum and qualities possessed by coaches are designed to cultivate an informal yet structured group atmosphere, with the participants engaging in lively, debate-like dialogues.
Coaches characterized groups as cohesive and agreeable Finding
Coaches tended to characterize the Phase II program groups as being cohesive and agreeable.
Fitzgerald parolees using skills at time 3 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Fitzgerald parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (8 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Jesup experimental group average age Statistic
The average age of the experimental group at Jesup was 33.8 years (N=7).
33.8 years
R&R exclusion of intellectually limited participants Finding
Because participation in the program entails such activities as thinking games and written homework assignments, individuals with extremely low IQ scores, and or limited reading abilities, are unlikely to benefit from R&R.
Application of skills increased as program progressed Trend
While the degree to which participants applied previously taught skills was somewhat low to begin with, application of skills increased as the program progressed.
Columbus parolees using skills at time 3 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Columbus parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 75.0% of parolees (3 of 4) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
75%
Jesup experimental group race distribution Statistic
At Jesup, 14.3% of the experimental group was White and 85.7% was nonwhite (N=7).
85.7%
R&R exclusion of severe substance abusers Finding
The concern for the Georgia program is with individuals impaired by their addiction to the extent that they fail to attend treatment regularly and or cannot focus on the program; treatment for substance abusers may require program components such as…
Observer-identified strengths of program Finding
Observers rated 'sensitivity to participant's feelings' and 'group participation' as strengths of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program, with substantial consistency in the presence of these qualities across program sites.
LaGrange parolees using skills at time 3 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (11 of 11) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
100%
Jesup experimental group substance abuse history Statistic
At Jesup, 42.9% of the experimental group had a history of substance abuse (N=7).
42.9%
R&R exclusion of sex offenders Finding
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Program excludes sex offenders because sexual offending necessitates some offense-specific treatment content, and discussions of sexual offending behaviors are conducted more appropriately among other sex offenders.
Areas with most room for improvement Finding
Areas of implementation that varied the most from program to program were 'general issues and class structure,' 'organization,' and 'delivery and response to participant's use of skills.' These three areas also were considered to have the most room …
Lyons parolees using skills at time 3 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Lyons parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 93.3% of parolees (14 of 15) were reported to be using skills at time 3.
93.3%
Jesup experimental group average IQ Statistic
The average IQ of the experimental group at Jesup was 95.0 (N=7).
95 IQ points
R&R behavioral process requirements Finding
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Program should incorporate behavioral processes including modeling, role playing, graduated rehearsal, and reinforcement in order for offenders to master the cognitive skills.
Improvements noted in all five implementation areas Trend
Improvements were noted in all five implementation areas from the first to second observations; the percent of program groups rated as below the mode at the second observation was lower than at the first observation on all five scales.
Dahlonega parolees using skills at time 5 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Dahlonega parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (6 of 6) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Jesup experimental group reading level Statistic
At Jesup, 57.1% of the experimental group read below 5th grade level and 42.9% read at 5th grade or above (N=7).
57.1%
R&R effectiveness for higher risk offenders Finding
Earlier studies of the R&R model found that higher risk offenders experienced the greatest gains from the treatment.
Participant ratings of social learning methods and skill relevance higher than group climate Finding
Participants scored the scales 'adherence to social learning methods' and 'relevance of skills to participants' higher on average than the 'group climate' scale.
Fitzgerald parolees using skills at time 5 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Fitzgerald parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 87.5% of parolees (7 of 8) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
87.5%
Jesup experimental group prior incarceration mean Statistic
The mean number of prior incarcerations for the Jesup experimental group was 1.4, with a median of 1.0 (N=7).
1.4 prior incarcerations
Cognitive treatment effectiveness for substance abusers Finding
Cognitive treatment often is effective for substance abusers (Prendergast, Anglin, & Wellisch, 1995).
Participant characteristics not related to evaluation scores Finding
Attributes of the participants, such as risk level, race, personality type and I-level, were not related to participant evaluation scale scores. The setting of the program in either the community or an institution was unrelated to participant assess…
Columbus parolees using skills at time 5 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Columbus parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (5 of 5) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Jesup experimental group prior felony convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior felony convictions for the Jesup experimental group was 2.9, with a median of 3.0 (N=7).
2.9 prior felony convictions
Cognitive interventions for sex offenders Finding
Cognitive interventions have demonstrated a degree of effectiveness when the treatment groups are limited to sex offenders (Polizzi, MacKenzie, & Hickman, 1999).
Subgroups less likely to report coaches reading from manual Finding
Women, neurotics, situationals, and I-Level 4s were less likely to indicate that coaches read from the manual the majority of the class time.
LaGrange parolees using skills at time 5 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the LaGrange parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (13 of 13) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Jesup experimental group prior violent convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior violent convictions for the Jesup experimental group was 1.3, with a median of 1.0 (N=7).
1.3 prior violent convictions
Program completion is key component of program success Finding
Whether program participants complete the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program has shown in Phase I to be an important predictor of later criminal involvement.
Jefferson parolees using skills at time 5 (without comparison groups) Statistic
In the Jefferson parole district (program groups without comparison groups), 100.0% of parolees (10 of 10) were reported to be using skills at time 5.
100%
Jesup experimental group prior property convictions mean Statistic
The mean number of prior property convictions for the Jesup experimental group was 1.6, with a median of 2.0 (N=7).
1.6 prior property convictions
Coaches employ behavioral techniques frequently Finding
Participants' evaluation of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program suggests that coaches employ behavioral techniques including role modeling, role playing, graduated rehearsal, and reinforcement, and do so on a frequent basis.
Sources
84 cited sources backing this research.
Secondary
Academic
Andrews & Bonta (1998)
Primary
Academic
Andrews and Bonta (1998)
Primary
Academic
Andrews, Bonta and Hoge (1990)
Secondary
Academic
Andrews, D. & Bonta, J. (1994). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct
Secondary
Academic
Andrews, D., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology
Secondary
Academic
Carmines, E. & Zeller, R. (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment
Primary
Academic
Cattell & Cattell (1973)
Secondary
Academic
Cattell, R. and A. Cattell (1973) Measuring Intelligence with the Culture Fair Tests
Primary
Academic
Dobson & Khatri (2000)
Secondary
Academic
Dodson, K. & Khatri, N. (2000). Cognitive Therapy: Looking Backward, Looking Forward
Secondary
Academic
Hair (1992)
Secondary
Academic
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., and Black, W. (1992) Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd ed.)
Secondary
Academic
Harris (1988)
Secondary
Academic
Harris (1988) Interpersonal Maturity Levels summary
Secondary
Academic
Harris, P. (1988). The Interpersonal Maturity Level Classification System I-Level
Primary
Academic
Hoffman (1994) Salient Factor Score
Secondary
Academic
Hoffman, P. (1994). Twenty Years of Operational Use of a Risk Prediction Instrument: The United States Parole Commission's Salient Factor Score
Secondary
Academic
Jesness (1988)
Secondary
Academic
Jesness (1988) Interpersonal Maturity Levels summary
Primary
Academic
Jesness (1992)
Primary
Academic
Jesness (1992) Jesness Inventory
Secondary
Academic
Jesness & Wedge (1983)
Secondary
Academic
Jesness Inventory Computer Program Windows Version (1996)
Secondary
Academic
Jesness, C. (1992) The Jesness Inventory (Form G)
Secondary
Academic
Jesness, C. F. (1988). The Jesness Inventory Classification System
Secondary
Academic
Jesness, C. F., & Wedge, R. (1983). Classifying Offenders: The Jesness Inventory Classification System
Secondary
Academic
Levinson (1988)
Secondary
Academic
Levinson, R. (1988). Developments in the classification process: Quay's aims approach
Secondary
Academic
McIver, J. & Carmines, E. (1981) Unidimensional Scaling
Secondary
Academic
Meichenbaum, D. & Jaremko, M. (1982). Stress Prevention and Management: A Cognitive Behavioral Approach
Primary
Academic
Palmer (1991)
Secondary
Academic
Palmer, T. (1991) The Effectiveness of Intervention: Recent Trends and Current Issues
Secondary
Academic
Polizzi, D., MacKenzie, D., and Hickman, L. (1999) What Works in Adult Sex Offender Treatment? A Review of Prison- and Non-Prison-Based Treatment Programs
Primary
Academic
Polizzi, MacKenzie, & Hickman (1999)
Secondary
Academic
Porporino, F., Fabiano, E. & Robinson, D. (1991). Focusing on Successful Reintegration: Cognitive Skills Training for Offenders
Primary
Academic
Porporino, Fabiano, & Robinson (1991)
Primary
Academic
Prendergast, Anglin, & Wellisch (1995)
Secondary
Academic
Prendergast, M., Anglin, M., and Wellisch, J (1995) Treatment for Drug-Abusing Offenders Under Community Supervision
Secondary
Academic
Reid (1986)
Secondary
Academic
Reid, N. (1986) Wide-Range Achievement Test - 1984 Revised Edition
Primary
Official report
Research and Statistics Branch of Correctional Services of Canada (1991)
Primary
Official report
Research and Statistics Branch of Correctional Services of Canada (1991) Effectiveness of the Cognitive Skills Training Program: From Pilot to National Implementation
Primary
Official report
Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Services of Canada (1991)
Secondary
Academic
Reynolds (1986)
Secondary
Academic
Reynolds, C. (1986) Wide-Range Achievement Test (WRAT-R), 1984 Edition
Primary
Academic
Robinson (1995)
Secondary
Academic
Robinson, D. (1995). The Impact of Cognitive Skills Training on Post-Release Recidivism among Canadian Federal Offenders
Primary
Academic
Ross and Fabiano (1985)
Primary
Academic
Ross and Fabiano (1985) Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program
Primary
Academic
Ross, Fabiano, and Ross (1989)
Primary
Academic
Ross, Fabiano, and Ross (1989) R&R facilitators' handbook
Primary
Academic
Ross, Fabiano, and Ross (1989) Reasoning and Rehabilitation facilitators' handbook
Secondary
Academic
Ross, R. & Fabiano, E. (1985). Time to Think: A Cognitive Model of Delinquency Prevention and Offender Rehabilitation
Secondary
Academic
Ross, R. & Fabiano, E., and Ross, R. (1989) Reasoning and Rehabilitation: A Handbook for Teaching Cognitive Skills
Secondary
Academic
Ross, R. & Fabiano, E., Ewles, C. (1988). Reasoning and Rehabilitation
Secondary
Academic
Sullivan, C., Grant, M. Q., & Grant, D. (1957). The Development of Interpersonal Maturity: An Application to Delinquency
Secondary
Academic
Sullivan, Grant, & Grant (1957)
Primary
Official report
Primary
Academic
The Jesness Inventory Computer Program Windows Version (1996)
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis (1994) collapsed Jesness Inventory types
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis (1994) Jesness Inventory personality types
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis (1994) Jesness Inventory personality types in male federal penitentiary inmates
Secondary
Academic
Van Voorhis & Brown (1996)
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis et al. (2001)
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis et al. (2001) Phase I completion as predictor of criminal involvement
Primary
Official report
Van Voorhis et al. (2001) Phase I outcome evaluation
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis et al. (2001) Phase I outcome study
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis, Cullen & Applegate (1995)
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis, Murphy, & Johnson (1999)
Primary
Official report
Van Voorhis, Murphy, and Johnson (1999) Phase I process evaluation
Secondary
Academic
Van Voorhis, P. and Brown, K. (1996). Risk Classification in the 1990s
Secondary
Academic
Van Voorhis, P., Cullen, F. & Applegate, B. (1995). Evaluating Interventions with Violent Offenders: A Guide from Practitioners and Policy Makers
Secondary
Academic
Van Voorhis, P., Johnson, S., Spruance, S., and Sutherland, J. (forthcoming). The Need to Measure Intermediate Outcomes
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis, P., Murphy, L., and Johnson, S. (1999). Process Evaluation of the Georgia Cognitive Skills Program: Phase I
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis, P., Spruance, L., Listwan, S., Ritchey, P., Pealer, J., and Seabrook, R. (2001) The Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment Outcome Evaluation: Phase I
Primary
Academic
Van Voorhis, Spruance, Listwan, Ritchey, Pealer, and Seabrook (2001)
Secondary
Academic
Van Voorhis, Spruance, Listwan, Ritchey, Pealer, and Seabrook (2001) research review
Secondary
Academic
Warren (1966) Interpersonal Maturity Levels summary
Secondary
Academic
Warren (1983)
Secondary
Academic
Warren et al. (1966)
Secondary
Academic
Warren, M. (1966). Interpersonal Maturity Level Classification: Diagnosis and Treatment of Low, Middle, and High Maturity Delinquents
Secondary
Academic
Warren, M. (1983). Application of Interpersonal Maturity Theory to Offender Population
Primary
Academic
Yochelson & Samenow (1976)
Secondary
Academic
Yochelson, S. & Samenow, S. (1976). The Criminal Personality (vol 1): A Profile for Change
Key Entities
Organizations, people, facilities, and other named entities referenced in this research.
Augusta
[facility]
Brunswick
[facility]
Cairo
[facility]
Carrollton
[facility]
Carrollton Parole District
[facility]
Clarkesville
[facility]
Coastal State Prison
[facility]
Columbus
[facility]
Culture Fair Intelligence Test
[program]
Dahlonega
[facility]
Douglas
[facility]
Elizabeth Fabiano
[person]
Fitzgerald
[facility]
Frank Porporino
[person]
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
[organization]
Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment
[program]
Georgia Cognitive Skills Program
[program]
Griffin
[facility]
Hartwell
[facility]
Jefferson
[facility]
Jennifer Pealer
[person]
Jesness Inventory
[program]
Jesup
[facility]
Jonesboro
[facility]
LaFayette
[facility]
LaGrange
[facility]
Lawrenceville
[facility]
Lisa M. Spruance
[person]
Lyons
[facility]
Marietta
[facility]
Metro State Prison
[facility]
Milledgeville
[facility]
National Institute of Justice
[organization]
North Fulton
[facility]
OTIS
[program]
Patricia Van Voorhis
[person]
Peter B. Hoffman
[person]
Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program
[program]
Renita Seabrook
[person]
Ross and Fabiano
[person]
Ross, Fabiano, and Ross
[person]
Ross, Fabiano, and Ross (1989)
[person]
Salient Factor Risk Score
[program]
Savannah
[facility]
Shelley Johnson Listwan
[person]
South Dekalb
[facility]
South Metro
[facility]
South Richmond
[facility]
Statesboro
[facility]
Thomas
[facility]
University of Cincinnati
[organization]
Van Voorhis, Murphy, & Johnson (1999)
[person]
Waycross
[facility]
Whitworth Detention Center
[facility]
Wide-Range Achievement Test
[program]
Related Topics
Research topics that draw on data from this collection.
Parole & Sentencing
Georgia's parole pipeline has contracted sharply: the Board of Pardons and Paroles released 5,588 people in FY2025, down roughly 42 percent from 9,455 in FY2019, while the share of people leaving prison at sentence expiration climbed. Life-sentenced Georgians now serve an average of 28 years before release — up from less than nine in 1973 — and the Board granted parole in 4.5 percent of life cases in FY2024. The result is a smaller, later, more selective release system operating alongside an aging prison population and record corrections spending.
11,379 data points
Population & Demographics
Georgia holds roughly 47,000 to 53,600 people in state custody depending on which official count is used, at an incarceration rate of 881 per 100,000 residents — among the highest of any American state and above every independent democratic nation. That population is majority Black by a margin state demographics do not explain, aging fast, and increasingly serving life and long-term sentences, while the parole supervision population has fallen by more than half since 2011. That no single consistent public number describes the system's size is itself a central finding.
10,831 data points
Recidivism & Reentry
Georgia measures reentry success with a single narrow number — felony reconviction within three years — which has ranged from roughly 24 to 31 percent over the past decade and excludes misdemeanor arrests, parole and probation violations, reoffending after year three, and everyone who dies before the window closes. Behind that number, the state releases roughly 12,000 to 16,000 people a year — more than half at sentence expiration with no parole supervision — into a reentry system with 2,344 transitional beds, no dedicated reentry line item in the GDC budget, and a first-two-weeks death risk 12.7 times the general population's. The interventions that reduce recidivism are among the best-evidenced in corrections; Georgia's spending on them is a rounding error.
8,109 data points
Reform Models & Programs
Georgia has repeatedly designed, piloted, and evaluated evidence-based rehabilitation models — cognitive-skills curricula, earned-time incentives, intensive supervision, reentry housing, addiction treatment — and then starved them of scale and funding. The national evidence base is unambiguous: cognitive-behavioral programs reduce recidivism 20–30%, correctional education cuts recidivism odds by 43% and returns $4–$5 per dollar spent, and vocational completers in Georgia recidivate at roughly half the general rate. Georgia's FY2027 budget nonetheless cut education line items while adding $22.1 million in new surveillance spending, and the state still publishes no outcome data that would let the public judge whether any of its programs work.
11,653 data points