110 verified data points extracted from primary sources.
VOI/TIS Grant Program Authorization Policy
The Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-in-Sentencing (VOI/TIS) Incentive Grant Program authorized $12.5 billion nationally, with nearly 50% earmarked for states adopting TIS laws requiring violent offenders to serve at least 85% of their sentences.
VOI/TIS
federal grants
truth in sentencing
Violent Crime Control Act
sentencing policy
Sources- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
- GAO Truth in Sentencing State Grants Report 1998 — Government Accountability Office, Jan 1, 1998
Number of Jurisdictions Receiving VOI/TIS Grants by 2001 Statistic
By 2001, 29 jurisdictions had received a combined $2.7 billion through the VOI/TIS program.
29 jurisdictions
VOI/TIS
federal grants
truth in sentencing
state adoption
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Total VOI/TIS Grants Disbursed by 2001 Statistic
By 2001, a combined $2.7 billion had been disbursed through the VOI/TIS program to 29 jurisdictions.
$2.7B
VOI/TIS
federal grants
truth in sentencing
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia Total Federal VOI/TIS Grant Awards Statistic
Georgia received a total of $82,211,036 in federal VOI/TIS grants between FY 1996 and FY 2001, ranking 9th nationally among recipient states.
$82.2M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
truth in sentencing
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia VOI/TIS National Ranking Finding
Georgia ranked 9th nationally among recipient states for VOI/TIS grant funding.
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
national ranking
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Beds Created with Georgia VOI/TIS Funds Statistic
Georgia's VOI/TIS federal grant funds were used to create 4,132 beds across the Department of Corrections and Department of Juvenile Justice.
4,132 beds
Georgia
VOI/TIS
prison capacity
beds
Department of Corrections
Department of Juvenile Justice
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia FY 1996 VOI/TIS Grant Statistic
Georgia received $14,073,653 in VOI/TIS grants in FY 1996.
$14.1M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia FY 1997 VOI/TIS Grant Statistic
Georgia received $23,923,177 in VOI/TIS grants in FY 1997, its largest single-year award.
$23.9M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia FY 1998 VOI/TIS Grant Statistic
Georgia received $16,249,000 in VOI/TIS grants in FY 1998.
$16.2M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia FY 1999 VOI/TIS Grant Statistic
Georgia received $14,073,653 in VOI/TIS grants in FY 1999.
$14.1M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia FY 2000 VOI/TIS Grant Statistic
Georgia received $6,745,553 in VOI/TIS grants in FY 2000.
$6.7M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Georgia FY 2001 VOI/TIS Grant Statistic
Georgia received $7,146,000 in VOI/TIS grants in FY 2001.
$7.1M
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
Source- Bureau of Justice Assistance VOI/TIS Final Report — Bureau of Justice Assistance
Urban Institute Finding: Limited Federal Influence on TIS Adoption Finding
The Urban Institute (Sabol et al. 2002) found that federal VOI/TIS grants had 'limited influence' on state adoption of TIS laws. Most states, including Georgia, enacted TIS legislation before the largest federal payments arrived.
Urban Institute
VOI/TIS
policy adoption
federal grants
Georgia
Source- Influence of Truth-in-Sentencing Reforms on Changes in States' Sentencing Practices and Prison Populations — Urban Institute, Jan 1, 2002
Urban Institute Warning on TIS Impact if Crime Rises Finding
The Urban Institute concluded that effects on prison population would have been 'much greater had violent crime rates not fallen substantially after 1991' and warned that 'were sentencing practices of 1996 to persist during time when violent offenses increase, impacts on prison populations and corrections management could be dramatic.'
Urban Institute
truth in sentencing
prison population
crime rates
projections
Source- Influence of Truth-in-Sentencing Reforms on Changes in States' Sentencing Practices and Prison Populations — Urban Institute, Jan 1, 2002
Early Parole Abolition States Had Lower Prison Growth Finding
Early parole-abolition states like Minnesota and Washington, which abolished parole for transparency and reducing sentencing disparities rather than increasing sentence length, generally had lower rates of prison population increase than parole-retention states.
parole abolition
prison population
Minnesota
Washington
sentencing reform
Sources- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
- Determinate Sentencing and Abolishing Parole: The Long-term Impacts on Prisons and Crime — Criminology, Jan 1, 1996
Oregon Measure 11 Mandatory Minimums Policy
Oregon's Measure 11 (1994) imposed mandatory minimums of 70–300 months for 16 designated crimes, later expanded to 21 crimes.
Oregon
Measure 11
mandatory minimums
truth in sentencing
Source- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
Georgia Seven Deadly Sins Law Policy
Georgia's Seven Deadly Sins law (1995) required life without parole for second conviction of seven serious violent felonies.
Georgia
Seven Deadly Sins
life without parole
sentencing policy
truth in sentencing
Source- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
Georgia Parole Abolition Policy
Georgia abolished parole for all offenses committed after 1996.
Georgia
parole abolition
truth in sentencing
sentencing policy
Source- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
Sleeper Effect of TIS Laws Methodology note
Mandatory minimum, TIS, and three-strikes laws requiring decades-long sentences have an inevitable 'sleeper effect': newly admitted prisoners accumulate for years before being offset by releases. Urban Institute, Vera Institute, and RAND studies all systematically underestimate TIS effects because their study periods end between 1996 and 2002.
sleeper effect
truth in sentencing
mandatory minimums
three strikes
research limitations
Source- Stemming the Tide: Strategies to Reduce Growth and Cut Cost of Federal Prison System — Urban Institute, Jan 1, 2013
Marvell & Moody: Parole Abolition and Prison Growth Finding
Using 1971–1993 data, only 1 of 10 parole-abolition states experienced a higher rate of prison population increase than the 50-state average. The lowest growth rates were found in Minnesota and Washington.
parole abolition
prison population growth
Minnesota
Washington
determinant sentencing
Source- Determinate Sentencing and Abolishing Parole: The Long-term Impacts on Prisons and Crime — Criminology, Jan 1, 1996
Georgia Conservative Direct Corrections Spending 1995-2025 Statistic
Conservative direct corrections spending in Georgia from 1995–2025 was estimated at $30.6 billion.
$30.6B
Georgia
corrections spending
fiscal impact
truth in sentencing
Georgia Total System Cost 1995-2025 Statistic
When including county jail operations ($500M+ annually), probation and parole supervision ($150–170M annually), court system costs ($200–300M annually), and capital construction, Georgia's total criminal justice system cost approaches $40–50 billion over 30 years (1995–2025).
40-50
Georgia
total system cost
corrections spending
fiscal impact
county jails
courts
Georgia County Jail Operations Annual Cost Statistic
Georgia county jail operations cost over $500 million annually.
$500M
Georgia
county jails
spending
Georgia Probation and Parole Supervision Annual Cost Statistic
Georgia probation and parole supervision costs $150–170 million annually.
150-170
Georgia
probation
parole
supervision costs
Georgia Court System Annual Cost Statistic
Georgia court system costs $200–300 million annually.
200-300
Georgia
court system
spending
Federal Grants as Percentage of Subsequent Costs Statistic
The $82 million in federal VOI/TIS grants equals just 0.2–0.3% of Georgia's subsequent total system costs. Georgia accepted a fiscal obligation roughly 400–600 times larger than the federal incentive payment.
0.2-0.3 vs. 400-600 ratio of obligation to incentive
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
fiscal impact
cost ratio
National Corrections Spending Growth 1980s to 2000s Statistic
State corrections spending increased from $11 billion to $50 billion annually between the 1980s and 2000s without commensurate public safety gains.
$50B vs. 11 billion dollars annually in the 1980s
national
corrections spending
growth
public safety
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
National Corrections Spending in 2015 Statistic
By 2015, total corrections spending reached $87 billion nationally.
$87B
national
corrections spending
National Prison Health Care Spending in 2011 Statistic
Prison health care alone consumed nearly $8 billion in 2011.
$8B
prison healthcare
spending
national
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Prison Health Care Spending Median Growth Rate 2007-2011 Statistic
Prison health care had a median 13% growth rate between FY 2007 and FY 2011.
13%
prison healthcare
spending growth
national
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Per-Inmate Health Care Spending Growth Statistic
Per-inmate health care spending rose in 39 states, with a median 10% growth rate between FY 2007 and FY 2011.
10% vs. 39 states with rising per-inmate costs
prison healthcare
per-inmate costs
spending growth
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
U.S. Incarceration Spending vs. Equivalent Public Safety (2000 vs 1975) Statistic
The Vera Institute found that the United States spent roughly $33 billion on incarceration in 2000 for roughly the same level of public safety it achieved in 1975 for $7.4 billion.
$33B vs. 7.4 billion dollars for equivalent safety in 1975
national
incarceration spending
public safety
cost effectiveness
Vera Institute
U.S. Corrections Spending vs. Equivalent Public Safety (2015 vs 1978) Statistic
By 2015, corrections spending reached $87 billion for the same public safety level achieved in 1978 for $5.5 billion.
$87B vs. 5.5 billion dollars for equivalent safety in 1978
national
corrections spending
public safety
cost effectiveness
Federal Prison Overcrowding 2012 Statistic
By 2012, the federal prison system was 35–40% above rated capacity, with high-security facilities at 51% overcapacity.
35-40 vs. 51 percent overcapacity for high-security facilities
federal prison
overcrowding
capacity
Source- Stemming the Tide: Strategies to Reduce Growth and Cut Cost of Federal Prison System — Urban Institute, Jan 1, 2013
Federal Prison Overcrowding Projection Statistic
Urban Institute projections indicated that if growth continued unabated, the federal system would incarcerate 50,000+ inmates over capacity per year through 2020, potentially reaching 50%+ overcapacity.
50,000 inmates over capacity per year
federal prison
overcrowding
projections
Urban Institute
Source- Stemming the Tide: Strategies to Reduce Growth and Cut Cost of Federal Prison System — Urban Institute, Jan 1, 2013
National Increase in Time Served 1990–2009 Statistic
Pew documented a 36% increase in time served nationally from 1990 to 2009, based on National Corrections Reporting Program data from 35 states representing 89% of 2009 releases.
36%
time served
national
sentencing
Pew
NCRP
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Average Time Served Increase 1990-1998 Statistic
Average time served increased from 38 months (1990) to 43 months (1998) nationally.
43 months vs. 38 months in 1990
time served
national
sentencing trends
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Violent Offenders Expected Length of Stay 2009 Statistic
Violent offenders entering or remaining in prison in 2009 could expect to spend about 7.1 years in custody—more than 2 years longer than the average for violent criminals released that year.
7.1 years expected vs. 2 years longer than average served by 2009 releases
violent offenders
time served
expected length of stay
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Louisiana Expected vs. Actual Time Served Statistic
In Louisiana, expected length of stay was 9.1 years vs. 5.3 years actually served by 2009 releases.
9.1 years expected vs. 5.3 years actually served by 2009 releases
Louisiana
time served
expected length of stay
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Pennsylvania Expected vs. Actual Time Served Statistic
In Pennsylvania, expected length of stay was 11.1 years vs. 5.9 years served by 2009 releases.
11.1 years expected vs. 5.9 years actually served by 2009 releases
Pennsylvania
time served
expected length of stay
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Release Rate Decline Despite Absolute Increases Statistic
Between 1990 and 1998, the release rate (number released per 100 prisoners) declined even as absolute releases increased from 405,374 to 520,172.
520,172 releases (1998) vs. 405,374 releases in 1990
release rate
prison releases
incarceration growth
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Pew Public Opinion Polling on Sentencing Reform Finding
January 2012 polling of 1,200 likely voters plus Georgia, Missouri, and Oregon surveys found broad support for policy changes shortening time served and reinvesting prison savings in stronger probation and parole supervision.
public opinion
sentencing reform
Pew
Georgia
Missouri
Oregon
Source- Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jun 1, 2012
Vera Institute: Incarceration Crime Reduction Effect Minimal Finding
Don Stemen's evidence brief for the Vera Institute found that incarceration's crime reduction effect is minimal at best and has been diminishing for years.
Vera Institute
incarceration effectiveness
crime reduction
diminishing returns
Incarceration's Near-Zero Crime Reduction Since 2000 Finding
Since 2000, increased incarceration accounted for nearly zero percent of the overall reduction in crime.
incarceration effectiveness
crime reduction
Vera Institute
Crime Decline Explained by Non-Incarceration Factors Finding
Between 75–100% of the crime decline since the 1990s is explained by factors OTHER than incarceration, including aging population, increased wages, increased employment, increased graduation rates, consumer confidence, law enforcement personnel changes, and policing strategy changes.
crime decline
incarceration effectiveness
alternative explanations
Vera Institute
No Demonstrated Effect of Incarceration on Violent Crime Finding
Increased incarceration has no demonstrated effect on violent crime. Crime reduction benefits from incarceration apply only to property crimes.
incarceration effectiveness
violent crime
property crime
Vera Institute
Incarceration May Increase Crime Finding
In some instances, incarceration may increase crime, according to the Vera Institute synthesis of research.
incarceration effectiveness
criminogenic effects
Vera Institute
19 States Reduced Both Incarceration and Crime 2000-2015 Statistic
19 states reduced BOTH incarceration AND crime rates between 2000 and 2015.
19 states
state reform
incarceration reduction
crime reduction
Vera Institute
New Jersey: Largest Incarceration Drop with Crime Decline Statistic
New Jersey achieved the largest incarceration drop (37% decrease) alongside a 30% decrease in crime between 2000 and 2015.
37% vs. 30 percent decrease in crime
New Jersey
incarceration reduction
crime reduction
reform success
West Virginia: Largest Incarceration Increase with Crime Increase Statistic
West Virginia had the largest incarceration increase (83%) and experienced a 4% increase in crime between 2000 and 2015.
83% vs. 4 percent increase in crime
West Virginia
incarceration increase
crime increase
All 4 States with Crime Increases Also Had Incarceration Increases Finding
Only 4 states experienced crime increases between 2000 and 2015—all 4 also had incarceration increases.
incarceration increase
crime increase
state comparison
Criminogenic Effects of Prison Finding
Criminogenic effects of prison include: breaking down social and family bonds, removing adults who would otherwise nurture children, depriving communities of income, reducing future income potential, and engendering deep resentment toward the legal system. Research suggests even short jail terms can increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in future criminal behavior.
criminogenic effects
prison
recidivism
family impact
community impact
Kuziemko: Georgia Parole Study Finding Statistic
Ilyana Kuziemko studied Georgia inmates using a discontinuity in parole board guidelines and found that each additional month served lowers the 3-year recidivism rate by 1.5%.
1.5%
Georgia
parole
recidivism
Kuziemko
sentence length
Source- How Should Inmates Be Released from Prison? An Assessment of Parole Versus Fixed-Sentence Regimes — Quarterly Journal of Economics, Jan 1, 2013
Roodman Reanalysis: Parole Bias in Kuziemko Study Finding
David Roodman's 2017 reanalysis of Kuziemko's Georgia data identified potential 'parole bias'—inmates released earlier spend more time on parole supervision, which may elevate measured recidivism through technical violations rather than new criminal behavior. Roodman found an insignificant impact of length of stay on recidivism.
Georgia
parole bias
recidivism
Roodman
methodology
Kuziemko reanalysis
Source- The Impacts of Incarceration on Crime — Open Philanthropy Project, Jan 1, 2017
Mueller-Smith: Imprisonment Increases Recidivism Finding
Michael Mueller-Smith's study found that imprisonment generates net increases in the frequency and severity of recidivism, worsens labor market outcomes, and strengthens dependence on public assistance.
Mueller-Smith
recidivism
employment
public assistance
incarceration effects
Source- The Criminal and Labor Market Impacts of Incarceration — University of Michigan (Working Paper), Jan 1, 2015
Employment Reduction Per Year of Incarceration Statistic
Each additional year behind bars reduces post-release employment by 3.6 percentage points.
3.6%
employment
incarceration effects
Mueller-Smith
labor market
Source- The Criminal and Labor Market Impacts of Incarceration — University of Michigan (Working Paper), Jan 1, 2015
Employment Drop for Long-Term Incarceration of Stable Earners Statistic
Among felony defendants with stable pre-charge earnings incarcerated 1+ years, post-release employment drops by at least 24 percentage points.
24%
employment
incarceration effects
Mueller-Smith
labor market
stable earners
Source- The Criminal and Labor Market Impacts of Incarceration — University of Michigan (Working Paper), Jan 1, 2015
Mueller-Smith: Deterrence Effects Needed to Justify Incarceration Finding
Mueller-Smith's cost-benefit analysis found that substantial general deterrence effects would be necessary to justify incarceration costs—effects larger than most evidence supports.
deterrence
cost-benefit
incarceration costs
Mueller-Smith
Source- The Criminal and Labor Market Impacts of Incarceration — University of Michigan (Working Paper), Jan 1, 2015
Norway: Imprisonment Decreases Reoffending by 29 Percentage Points Statistic
Using random assignment of cases to judges with different sentencing stringency in Norway, Bhuller et al. found that imprisonment decreases the probability of reoffending within 5 years by 29 percentage points and reduces the number of offenses by 11 criminal charges.
29% vs. 11 criminal charges reduction
Norway
recidivism
incarceration effects
Bhuller
natural experiment
IV estimate
Source- Incarceration, Recidivism and Employment — Journal of Political Economy, Jan 1, 2020
Norway vs. U.S. Average Prison Time Statistic
Average prison time in Norway is 184 days (6 months), with 90% of spells under 1 year, compared to 2.9 years in the U.S.
184 days (Norway average) vs. 2.9 years (U.S. average)
Norway
United States
prison time
international comparison
sentence length
Source- Incarceration, Recidivism and Employment — Journal of Political Economy, Jan 1, 2020
OLS vs. IV Estimates Show Selection Bias in Recidivism Methodology note
In the Norway study, OLS analysis showed positive associations between incarceration and recidivism, while IV estimates showed negative associations. This sharp contrast suggests that high recidivism rates among ex-convicts are due to selection (who gets incarcerated), not a consequence of the prison experience itself.
selection bias
methodology
OLS
IV
recidivism
Norway
Source- Incarceration, Recidivism and Employment — Journal of Political Economy, Jan 1, 2020
Meta-Analysis: Higher-Quality Studies Show Higher Recidivism for Incarcerated Finding
Comprehensive meta-analyses found that higher-quality comparison group studies reported higher recidivism rates for the incarcerated group relative to non-incarcerated alternatives. Two randomized designs found 5% and 9% increases in recidivism for the incarceration group.
meta-analysis
recidivism
incarceration effects
Gendreau
Goggin
Cullen
Source- The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism — Public Works and Government Services Canada, Jan 1, 1999
Liedka, Piehl, and Useem: Diminishing Marginal Returns of Incarceration Finding
Each increase in incarceration rates is associated with increasingly smaller reductions in crime rates. At high levels of incarceration, additional imprisonment produces negligible crime reduction effects and may actually increase crime.
diminishing returns
incarceration effectiveness
crime reduction
scale
Source- The Crime-Control Effect of Incarceration: Does Scale Matter? — Criminology & Public Policy, Jan 1, 2006
NRC: Primary Drivers of High Incarceration Finding
The National Research Council identified truth-in-sentencing initiatives, mandatory minimum sentences, three-strikes laws, and parole abolition/restriction as primary drivers of high incarceration.
National Research Council
incarceration drivers
truth in sentencing
mandatory minimums
three strikes
parole abolition
Source- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
NRC: Marginal-to-Zero Impact of Incarceration on Crime Finding
The National Research Council's comprehensive review concluded that incarceration has marginal-to-zero impact on crime, diminishing returns are well-documented, and 75–100% of crime reduction since the 1990s is explained by other factors.
National Research Council
incarceration effectiveness
crime reduction
consensus
Source- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
Georgia Annual Inmate Releases Statistic
Georgia releases approximately 15,000 inmates annually.
15,000 inmates released annually
Georgia
releases
prison population
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
Estimated Georgia Recidivism Premium: 1,500 Additional Recidivists Per Year Statistic
If Georgia's TIS policies increased recidivism by even 10 percentage points (consistent with Mueller-Smith's findings), this would equal 1,500 additional recidivists per year out of approximately 15,000 annual releases.
1,500 additional recidivists per year vs. 10 percentage point increase in recidivism
Georgia
recidivism premium
TIS
fiscal impact
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
Estimated Georgia Recidivism Premium: Annual Cost Statistic
At an average 3-year return stint and $30,000 per inmate-year, the 1,500 additional recidivists per year create 4,500 extra prison-years annually costing approximately $135 million annually.
$135M
Georgia
recidivism premium
TIS
fiscal impact
cost per inmate
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
Estimated Georgia Recidivism Premium: 20-Year Total Statistic
Over 20 years, Georgia's estimated recidivism premium from TIS policies totals approximately $2.7 billion.
$2.7B
Georgia
recidivism premium
TIS
fiscal impact
20-year projection
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
Georgia Cost Per Inmate-Year Estimate Statistic
GPS analysis uses $30,000 per inmate-year as the average cost for Georgia corrections.
$30,000
Georgia
cost per inmate
corrections spending
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
Incarceration Reduces Economic Mobility Finding
The Pew Charitable Trusts documented how incarceration reduces employment opportunities, reduces earnings, limits economic mobility, increases the likelihood that children of incarcerated parents will live in poverty, and increases the likelihood those children engage in delinquent behavior—creating an intergenerational poverty trap.
economic mobility
poverty
intergenerational effects
children
employment
Pew
Source- Collateral Costs: Incarceration's Effect on Economic Mobility — Pew Charitable Trusts, Jan 1, 2010
RAND: 43% Reduction in Recidivism from Correctional Education Statistic
RAND's meta-analysis covering correctional education programs from 1980 to 2013 found a 43% reduction in recidivism odds for correctional education participants.
43%
RAND
correctional education
recidivism
evidence-based
what works
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
RAND: Prison Education ROI $4-5 Per Dollar Statistic
RAND's meta-analysis found $4–5 savings per dollar invested in prison education.
4-5
RAND
correctional education
ROI
cost savings
evidence-based
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
RAND: 13% Higher Employment for Education Participants Statistic
Correctional education participants had 13% higher employment rates than non-participants.
13%
RAND
correctional education
employment
evidence-based
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Correctional Education Program Costs Statistic
Direct correctional education program costs range from $1,400–$1,744 per inmate.
1400-1744
RAND
correctional education
program costs
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Correctional Education Savings from Reduced Reincarceration Statistic
Savings from reduced reincarceration due to correctional education range from $8,700–$9,700 per participant over 3 years.
8700-9700
RAND
correctional education
cost savings
reincarceration
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Second Chance Pell: 40,000+ Students, 12,000 Credentials Statistic
The Second Chance Pell Experimental Sites Initiative (launched 2015) restored Pell Grant eligibility after a 21-year ban, with 40,000+ students participating by 2022, earning nearly 12,000 credentials.
40,000 students (by 2022) vs. 12,000 credentials earned
Second Chance Pell
correctional education
Pell Grant
credentials
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Texas: $241M+ Investment in Evidence-Based Programs Statistic
Texas invested $241M+ in evidence-based programs and swift/graduated sanctions as part of Justice Reinvestment Initiative.
$241M
Texas
justice reinvestment
evidence-based
reform
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Texas: 46% Drop in Parole Revocation Rate Statistic
Texas's parole revocation rate dropped 46% following justice reinvestment reforms.
46%
Texas
parole revocation
justice reinvestment
reform
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Texas: Crime Fell to Lowest Level Since 1960s Finding
Following justice reinvestment reforms, Texas's crime fell to its lowest level since the 1960s.
Texas
crime rate
justice reinvestment
reform success
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Texas: Avoided $3 Billion+ in Prison Costs Statistic
Texas avoided $3 billion+ in projected prison construction and operating costs through justice reinvestment reforms.
$3B
Texas
cost avoidance
justice reinvestment
prison construction
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Louisiana: 10 Reform Laws Passed in 2017 Statistic
Louisiana passed 10 reform laws in 2017 as part of justice reinvestment.
10 reform laws
Louisiana
reform
justice reinvestment
legislation
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Louisiana: 9% Prison Population Reduction by End of 2018 Statistic
Louisiana achieved a 9% prison population reduction by end of 2018 following justice reinvestment reforms.
9%
Louisiana
prison population
reduction
justice reinvestment
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Louisiana: 12% Reduction in Probation/Parole Population Statistic
Louisiana achieved a 12% reduction in probation/parole population following 2017 reforms.
12%
Louisiana
probation
parole
population reduction
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Louisiana: $30 Million Shifted to Community Services Statistic
Louisiana shifted $30 million to community-based services as part of justice reinvestment reforms.
$30M
Louisiana
community services
justice reinvestment
reinvestment
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
Oklahoma: 58% Voter Approval for Drug Reclassification in 2016 Statistic
In Oklahoma in 2016, 58% of voters approved converting drug possession from felony to misdemeanor.
58%
Oklahoma
drug policy
voter initiative
sentencing reform
Justice Reinvestment Initiative: 30+ States Participating Statistic
The Pew-supported Justice Reinvestment Initiative worked with 30+ states to implement data-driven reform.
30 states (30+)
justice reinvestment
Pew
state reform
data-driven
Source- Pew Charitable Trusts Justice Reinvestment Initiative reports — Pew Charitable Trusts
1990s Incarceration Growth Driver: Length of Time Served Finding
The Sentencing Project documented that the dominant driver of incarceration growth from the 1990s onward was length of time served, not crime rates or new admissions.
Sentencing Project
incarceration growth
time served
sentencing policy
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
Drug Offenders: 19% of State Prison Population Growth 1990-1998 Statistic
Drug offenders accounted for 19% of state prison population growth from 1990–1998.
19%
drug offenses
prison population
Sentencing Project
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
Drug Admissions Growth: 19,600 to 107,000 (1984-1998) Statistic
Annual drug admissions to state prisons grew from 19,600 (1984) to 107,000 (1998).
107,000 annual drug admissions (1998) vs. 19,600 annual drug admissions in 1984
drug offenses
prison admissions
growth
Sentencing Project
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
Drug Arrests Growth: 1,010,000 to 1,559,100 (1991-1998) Statistic
Drug arrests rose from 1,010,000 (1991) to 1,559,100 (1998).
1,559,100 drug arrests (1998) vs. 1,010,000 drug arrests in 1991
drug arrests
war on drugs
Sentencing Project
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
Mass Drug Incarceration Did Not Reduce Drug Availability Finding
Despite massive increases in drug-related incarceration, drugs remain easily available—neither mass arrest nor incarceration reduced drug availability.
drug policy
incarceration effectiveness
war on drugs
Sentencing Project
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
Oregon Measure 11: Behavioral Responses to Rigid Sentencing Finding
RAND's evaluation of Oregon's Measure 11 found significant behavioral adaptations: judges and lawyers altered charging decisions and plea bargaining. Fewer people were convicted of Measure 11 offenses, more were convicted of non-Measure 11 offenses, and those convicted of Measure 11 offenses received harsher sentences. Rigid sentencing laws create sizable distortions in charging and plea bargaining without necessarily achieving their stated public safety goals.
Oregon
Measure 11
mandatory minimums
plea bargaining
charging decisions
behavioral adaptation
RAND
Source- RAND Corporation Oregon Measure 11 Evaluation — RAND Corporation
Parole Bias Methodological Problem Methodology note
Studies measuring recidivism as return to prison may be systematically biased when comparing early vs. late releases. Early releases spend a larger fraction of the follow-up period on parole, raising the odds of reimprisonment for technical violations and increasing swiftness/certainty of return within a given follow-up period. This can make early release appear to increase crime without any real impact on crime.
parole bias
methodology
recidivism measurement
technical violations
Roodman
Source- The Impacts of Incarceration on Crime — Open Philanthropy Project, Jan 1, 2017
Heterogeneity of Incarceration Effects Methodology note
Incarceration effects vary by prior sanctioning experience, in-prison experiences, post-release support level, age, offense type, and whether the unit of analysis is individuals, families, or neighborhoods. Younger individuals and those with longer sentences show more robust responses to educational interventions. Property crimes and violent crimes show different incapacitation effects.
heterogeneity
incarceration effects
research methodology
age
offense type
Sources- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
- The Impacts of Incarceration on Crime — Open Philanthropy Project, Jan 1, 2017
TIS Study Period Limitations Data gap
Most TIS evaluations cover periods ending 1996–2002, systematically missing the 'sleeper effect' of decades-long sentences accumulating in the system. The full fiscal and population impact of TIS laws could not be observed during these early evaluation windows.
research gap
TIS
sleeper effect
study limitations
evaluation period
Sources- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
- The Impacts of Incarceration on Crime — Open Philanthropy Project, Jan 1, 2017
GPS: Ratio of Federal Incentive to State Obligation Finding
Georgia accepted $82M in federal incentives and took on $40–50B in subsequent costs—a ratio of roughly 1:500. The federal government effectively induced states to massively expand incarceration at state expense.
Georgia
VOI/TIS
federal grants
fiscal impact
cost ratio
GPS analysis
GPS: $47M Annual Commissary Extraction Enabled by TIS Statistic
Longer sentences from TIS mean more years of family commissary spending, phone charges, and visit costs. GPS has documented $47M annual commissary extraction, directly enabled by TIS-mandated longer sentences.
$47M
Georgia
commissary
family costs
TIS
GPS investigation
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
GPS: Classification Mismatches as TIS Consequence Finding
Classification mismatches—medium-security facilities housing close-security inmates at 10x normal rates—are a downstream consequence of TIS-driven overcrowding. These facilities have significantly higher mortality rates.
Georgia
classification
overcrowding
TIS
mortality
GPS investigation
Source- GPS analysis applying academic recidivism findings (Mueller-Smith) to Georgia corrections data — Georgia Prisoners' Speak
Projected Average Time Before First Release 1990 vs 1998 Statistic
Between 1990–1998, projected average time before first release increased from 38 to 43 months.
43 months (1998) vs. 38 months (1990)
time served
projected release
sentencing trends
Sentencing Project
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
New Jersey TIS: 85% Requirement for Violent Offenses Policy
New Jersey's TIS law required 85% of sentence served for violent offenses.
New Jersey
truth in sentencing
violent offenses
85 percent
Source- The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — The National Academies Press, Jan 1, 2014
TIS Required Percentages Much Higher Than Pre-TIS Actual Finding
By 1998, the percentages of terms required to be served under TIS were much higher than the actual percentages served by 1993 releases—in most cases at least doubled.
truth in sentencing
time served
sentencing comparison
Source- Influence of Truth-in-Sentencing Reforms on Changes in States' Sentencing Practices and Prison Populations — Urban Institute, Jan 1, 2002
1980s Incarceration Growth Driven by Drug Offense Sanctioning Finding
In the 1980s, the primary driver of incarceration growth was increased use of incarceration as a sanction, especially for drug offenses.
1980s
incarceration growth
drug offenses
war on drugs
Sentencing Project
Source- Diminishing Returns: Crime and Incarceration in the 1990s — The Sentencing Project, Jan 1, 2000
Pell Grant Ban Duration for Prisoners Policy
There was a 21-year ban on Pell Grant eligibility for incarcerated students before the Second Chance Pell Experimental Sites Initiative restored it in 2015.
Pell Grant
correctional education
policy
ban
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Norway Invests Heavily in Rehabilitation and Reentry Finding
Norway invests heavily in rehabilitation, vocational training, and reentry support. Per-year costs are higher in Norway, but per-spell costs are lower due to shorter sentences.
Norway
rehabilitation
vocational training
reentry
international comparison
Source- Incarceration, Recidivism and Employment — Journal of Political Economy, Jan 1, 2020
90% of Norway Prison Spells Under 1 Year Statistic
In Norway, 90% of prison spells are under 1 year.
90%
Norway
sentence length
international comparison
Source- Incarceration, Recidivism and Employment — Journal of Political Economy, Jan 1, 2020
RAND Correctional Education Meta-Analysis Coverage Period Methodology note
RAND's correctional education meta-analysis covered programs from 1980 to 2013.
RAND
meta-analysis
correctional education
methodology
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Correctional Education: Even Partial Participation Reduces Recidivism Finding
Even partial participation in correctional education programs reduces recidivism compared to no participation.
correctional education
recidivism
RAND
partial participation
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
RAND Education Research Influenced First Step Act Finding
RAND's correctional education research influenced the First Step Act of 2018 educational provisions.
RAND
First Step Act
correctional education
policy influence
Source- How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? — RAND Corporation, Jan 1, 2013
Schools of Crime vs. Minimalist Position Finding
The 'schools of crime' viewpoint holds that the barren, inhumane, psychologically destructive nature of prisonization makes offenders more likely to recidivate. The 'minimalist/interaction' position holds that effects of prison on offenders are minimal with few exceptions.
prisonization
schools of crime
recidivism theory
criminology
Source- The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism — Public Works and Government Services Canada, Jan 1, 1999