Prison Labor & Economics
Key Findings
Critical data points synthesized across multiple research collections.
Forced Labor and Wage Suppression
Approximately 800,000 incarcerated workers labor inside U.S. state and federal prisons, producing more than $2 billion in goods and over $9 billion in services annually — numbers confirmed by GPS's review of Prison Labor & Wage Exploitation in Georgia research. Georgia's incarcerated workforce is embedded in that national system, compelled to maintain prison infrastructure, prepare food, and perform agricultural and industrial work under conditions the 13th Amendment explicitly permits as punishment for crime. The constitutional loophole is not a relic; it is the legal engine of a modern labor system that renders incarcerated people, in the words of one Michigan prisoner, "a slave to the economic serving of the state."
Georgia pays its incarcerated workers wages that range from nothing to nominal amounts — fractions of a dollar per hour in the rare cases where any compensation exists at all. The state does not publish comprehensive wage data, a documented gap in the research record. For context, Michigan — one of the few states with documented wage figures — pays incarcerated workers an average of just $12 to $16 per month, a sum so inadequate that vendors selling shoes, food packages, and tablets openly design their business models around extracting payment from prisoners' families and friends rather than the workers themselves. As one vendor-facing policy makes explicit: "Those vendors aim not for the incarcerated person to pay, but their family and friends." Georgia's wage floor is, in documented cases, lower still — at or near zero.
What is documented is the downstream consequence: because workers earn almost nothing, their families become the system's true financial substrate. Commissary markups of 83% to 1,150% above retail (Prison Labor & Wage Exploitation in Georgia) are only sustainable because someone outside the walls must fund them. That someone is almost always a low-income family member, disproportionately Black and female, sending money from a household already strained by the loss of the incarcerated person's income. According to a survey by the Ella Baker Center, roughly 65% of families with a loved one in prison were unable to meet their basic needs because court-related fines and fees sent them into debt — with average court-related debt exceeding $13,000 per family. The Prison Policy Initiative corroborates the scale of this crisis: 58% of families reported they could not afford the costs associated with a conviction at all.
This financial burden does not fall randomly. The poorest communities are the ones most heavily policed and funneled into prison, with incarcerated populations disproportionately composed of poor Black and brown people. Incarceration then compounds the poverty that preceded it. Court-ordered fees and restitutions are garnished directly from trust accounts established by the state, establishing the economic extraction framework from the moment of sentencing. As one incarcerated person put it: "It cost money to be poor, and it seemed to be a major reason for crime to run rampant in low-income neighborhoods." The system that punishes poverty is simultaneously engineered to deepen it.
The historical roots of this arrangement are not incidental. Georgia's convict leasing program — which emerged immediately after the Civil War in 1866 — established the template: state-owned labor, contracted to private interests, generating revenue for government while producing zero wages for workers. Modern prison labor retains the core structure while shedding the most legally vulnerable features. The 2010 Georgia Prison Strike, in which incarcerated people refused to work and demanded wages, demonstrated that incarcerated workers understand this history and resist it when conditions become intolerable. The state's response was punitive, not reformist. That punitive logic extends to labor compliance itself: in Michigan, participation in the prison job pool is mandatory, and refusing to work can result in long-term isolation. Coercion, not compensation, is the enforcement mechanism.
The Commissary Extraction Machine
Georgia's commissary system is a captive retail monopoly operating at margins that would be illegal in any open market. GPS's review of commissary pricing data reveals the mechanics in granular detail: a 3oz packet of Maruchan ramen that retails for $0.15 at Walmart (bulk unit price) or $0.31 in a 12-pack costs $0.90 in Georgia's commissary — a markup of 190% to 500% depending on the comparison (Georgia's Prison Commissary Extraction Machine). Generic 200mg ibuprofen, available at $0.02 per tablet at Walmart, costs $0.17–$0.20 per tablet in commissary — a markup approaching 900%. Across 20 tracked items, the commissary system extracts an estimated $3–$5 million annually from families who have no alternative supplier.
The scale of that extraction becomes visible in sales volume data. A single ramen flavor sells 2.3 million units per year through Georgia's commissary system; beef sticks alone move over 1 million units annually. These are not luxury purchases — ramen and beef sticks are caloric supplements purchased by people whose state-provided meals are nutritionally inadequate. The commissary markup is, in this sense, a hunger tax: the state underfeeds people and then profits from their need to eat. Combined with families' $5.6 billion in annual national spending on commissary, phone calls, and necessities — at markups reaching 600% above retail cost (Families as the Hidden Tax Base) — the commissary system represents one of the most regressive transfer mechanisms in American public finance.
The product universe available through prison commissary and vendor systems extends well beyond food staples. Shoes cost upward of $70. Securepak food orders reach $150. A tablet, factoring in purchases of music and games, can exceed $500 in total cost. In Michigan, incarcerated people are restricted to a single green duffle bag of personal property — anything that cannot fit is classified as contraband and destroyed — which means an aluminum footlocker from Michigan State Industries, available for $150, becomes a near-necessity simply to store permitted belongings. Each of these price points is set against a wage floor of $12 to $16 per month at best, and zero in Georgia. The math is not incidental; it is the design. The vendors do not expect the incarcerated person to pay. They expect the family to.
These costs are not static. Since 2020, incarcerated people in Michigan have received email notifications of price increases on clothing and food items available through kiosks. In 2025, prices rose again due to tariff-driven cost pressures — meaning that macroeconomic policy shocks are passed directly and immediately onto incarcerated people and their families, who have no market alternatives and no negotiating power. The most economically vulnerable people in the country absorb price volatility that wealthier consumers can partially offset through substitution or savings.
A critical data gap exists here: Georgia does not publicly disclose what percentage of commissary revenue is retained by the Department of Corrections versus contracted vendors, nor does it publish itemized profit-and-loss statements for commissary operations. GPS has requested this data; it has not been provided. What is known is that commis
Related Topics
Explore related areas of research.
Related Articles
3 GPS articles connected to this topic.
Contributing Collections
Research collections that contribute data to this topic.
Sources
100 cited sources across all contributing collections.