Prison Economics/Poverty
Economic Exploitation in Prison: Wages, Fees, and the Poverty Cycle
This first-person essay by incarcerated writer Demetrius Buckley, published by the Vera Institute of Justice, documents the economic exploitation of incarcerated people and their families in Michigan prisons. Key findings include average prison wages of $12-$16/month, mandatory labor enforced by threat of solitary confinement, and data showing 65% of families with incarcerated loved ones cannot meet basic needs due to court-related debt averaging over $13,000. The piece contextualizes mass incarceration as a driver of poverty in Black and brown communities and introduces Vera's new Incarceration and Inequality Project (IIP) Data Explorer tool.
Key Findings
The most impactful data from this research collection.
$12.00
$12-$16/month: Michigan prison wages
Statistic65%
65% of families unable to meet basic needs
Statistic$13,000
$13,000+ average court debt per family
StatisticVendors target families, not incarcerated people
FindingAll Data Points
21 verified data points extracted from primary sources.
Average Michigan prison wages: $12-$16 per month Statistic
Incarcerated people in Michigan prisons earn an average of $12 to $16 per month from prison jobs, depending on their court circumstance and job description.
$12.00 vs. dollars per month (high end)
65% of families with incarcerated loved ones unable to meet basic needs Statistic
According to a survey by the Ella Baker Center, roughly 65 percent of families with a loved one in prison were unable to meet their basic needs because court-related fines and fees sent them into debt of more than $13,000 on average.
65%
Average court-related debt exceeds $13,000 per family Statistic
Court-related fines and fees send families with an incarcerated loved one into debt of more than $13,000 on average, according to the Ella Baker Center.
$13,000
58% of families cannot afford costs associated with conviction Statistic
According to the Prison Policy Initiative, 58 percent of families could not afford 'the costs associated with a conviction.'
58%
Commissary shoes cost $70+ Statistic
The institution offered access to vendors that supply shoes costing more than $70 to incarcerated people via kiosk ordering.
$70.00
Securepak food orders cost up to $150 Statistic
Securepak orders (food items) available to incarcerated people cost up to $150.
$150.00
Tablet costs with entertainment exceed $500 Statistic
A tablet available to incarcerated people, including the purchase of music and games, can be worth more than $500.
$500.00
Footlocker storage costs $150 Statistic
Author paid $150 for an aluminum footlocker from Michigan State Industries to store belongings beyond the one green duffle bag limit per person. Items that cannot fit inside the duffle bag are labeled contraband and destroyed.
$150.00
Mandatory labor in Michigan prisons enforced by threat of solitary Policy
Labor in Michigan prisons is mandatory. Not participating in the job pool could lead the incarcerated person to long-time isolation.
Tariff-driven price increases burden incarcerated people and families since 2025 Trend
Since 2020, incarcerated people have been receiving email blasts explaining price spikes in clothing and food items available from the kiosk. In 2025, the price rose again due to tariff wars, further burdening incarcerated people and their families.
Incarcerated people's property limited to one duffle bag Policy
Incarcerated people in Michigan prisons are limited to one green duffle bag per person. Any item that can't fit inside is labeled contraband and destroyed.
Poorest communities most policed and funneled into prison Finding
The poorest communities are the ones most policed and funneled into prison. A high percentage of incarcerated bodies are poor Black and brown people.
Vendors target families rather than incarcerated people for payment Finding
Vendors offering shoes, food packages, tablets, and other items aim not for the incarcerated person to pay, but their family and friends, given that prison wages of $12-$16/month are wholly insufficient to cover these costs.
Paying debt to society does not repair victims' families Finding
Paying a debt to society has less to do with repairing the victim's family's true desires, especially when both victim and perpetrator are from the same demographics. The author's time and money went to MDOC rather than to victims or communities.
Constitutional provision allows prisoners to be in servitude Legal fact
The United States Constitution declares prisoners to be in servitude, which the author characterizes as being 'a slave to the economic serving of the state.'
Court-ordered fees and restitutions garnished from trust accounts Case detail
Upon sentencing in 2010, court-ordered fees and restitutions were set to be garnished from a trust account set up by the state for the incarcerated person, establishing the economic framework for incarceration from the outset.
Vera Institute launches Incarceration and Inequality Project Data Explorer Finding
Vera's new Incarceration and Inequality Project (IIP) Data Explorer is an interactive tool that gives advocates and policymakers ready access to data on the connection between incarceration and economic indicators—both nationally and within their co…
Quote: Economic exploitation of incarcerated people by MDOC Quote
"My time and money went to MDOC, which makes top dollar off me and other incarcerated people."
Quote: It cost money to be poor Quote
"It cost money to be poor, and it seemed to be a major reason for crime to run rampant in low-income neighborhoods."
Quote: Paying a debt to society has less to do with repairing the victim's family Quote
"Paying a debt to society has less to do with helping or repairing the victim's family's true desires, especially if both victim and perpetrator are from the same demographic."
Quote: Vendors target families not incarcerated people Quote
"Those vendors aim not for the incarcerated person to pay, but their family and friends."
Sources
3 cited sources backing this research.
Primary
Official report
Ella Baker Center survey on families and incarceration costs
Primary
Journalism
Primary
Official report
Prison Policy Initiative: Costs associated with conviction
Key Entities
Organizations, people, facilities, and other named entities referenced in this research.
Demetrius Buckley
[person]
Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
[organization]
Incarceration and Inequality Project
[program]
Michigan Department of Corrections
[organization]
Michigan State Industries
[organization]
Prison Policy Initiative
[organization]
Securepak
[organization]
Vera Institute of Justice
[organization]
Related Topics
Research topics that draw on data from this collection.
Communications & Technology
Georgia's prison communications system operates as a state-sanctioned extraction economy, funneling millions in kickbacks to the Georgia Department of Corrections while leaving incarcerated people and their families financially depleted by monopoly pricing, predatory fees, and markups that can exceed 1,000% above retail. Simultaneously, GDC has spent approximately $50 million deploying Managed Access Systems (MAS) — contraband cell-signal blocking technology — that critics and international evidence suggest may be an expensive, ineffective substitute for the legal, affordable phone access that reduces violence and improves outcomes. The result is a system that profits from isolation while claiming to address the contraband phones that isolation itself produces.
1,951 data points
Policy & Advocacy
Georgia Prisoners' Speak documents a prison system whose policy architecture — from $0.54-per-meal food budgets to a 50% correctional officer vacancy rate — systematically produces violence, illness, and recidivism while shifting hundreds of billions of dollars in costs onto families and taxpayers. Reform advocacy must contend with a $1.8 billion annual corrections apparatus that prioritizes surveillance contracts and sentence length over rehabilitation, reentry, or basic constitutional standards of care. This page synthesizes the evidence base for legislative, budgetary, and structural reforms across nutrition, staffing, communications, solitary confinement, parole, post-conviction relief, and decarceration.
3,003 data points
Prison Labor & Economics
Georgia's prison system operates as a multi-layered economic extraction machine, forcing incarcerated people — who earn nothing or near-nothing for their labor — to purchase basic necessities at commissary markups ranging from 83% to 1,150% above retail, while their families absorb costs that collectively reach hundreds of billions of dollars annually. This economic architecture did not emerge by accident: it traces directly to the convict leasing system established after the Civil War, and it is sustained today by monopoly contracts, wage suppression, and a captive consumer population with no alternatives. The result is a system in which punishment is monetized at every point of contact, from the prison gate to the phone call home.
2,237 data points
Recidivism & Reentry
Georgia releases 14,000–16,000 people from its prisons each year into communities with minimal preparation, support, or resources — yet the state's official recidivism rate of 25–27% obscures a far grimmer reality: when technical violations, arrests, and extended measurement windows are factored in, the true return-to-incarceration rate approaches 50%. With 528,000 Georgia residents under criminal justice supervision and an incarceration rate of 881 per 100,000 — higher than any nation on earth except El Salvador — the state's failure to invest meaningfully in reentry is not merely a policy gap but a documented engine of mass incarceration costing taxpayers $1.8 billion annually.
1,405 data points
Solitary Confinement
Georgia's use of solitary confinement and restrictive housing exposes prisoners to documented psychological devastation, racial disparity, and systemic neglect — conditions so severe that federal courts have imposed daily fines on the Georgia Department of Corrections for flagrant violations of its own settlement agreements. Georgia's Special Management Unit held 78% of its population in isolation for more than two years as of 2017, while staffing vacancies exceeding 70% at the state's largest facilities made meaningful oversight, programming, or humane treatment functionally impossible. The data, drawn from court records, federal investigations, and peer-reviewed research, reveals a system where isolation is used not as a last resort but as a default response — with predictable and measurable consequences for mental health, safety, and human dignity.
673 data points