Prison Economics/Poverty
Economic Exploitation in Prison: Wages, Fees, and the Poverty Cycle
This first-person essay by incarcerated writer Demetrius Buckley, published by the Vera Institute of Justice, documents the economic exploitation of incarcerated people and their families in Michigan prisons. Key findings include average prison wages of $12-$16/month, mandatory labor enforced by threat of solitary confinement, and data showing 65% of families with incarcerated loved ones cannot meet basic needs due to court-related debt averaging over $13,000. The piece contextualizes mass incarceration as a driver of poverty in Black and brown communities and introduces Vera's new Incarceration and Inequality Project (IIP) Data Explorer tool.
Key Findings
The most impactful data from this research collection.
$12.00
$12-$16/month: Michigan prison wages
Statistic65%
65% of families unable to meet basic needs
Statistic$13,000
$13,000+ average court debt per family
StatisticVendors target families, not incarcerated people
FindingAll Data Points
21 verified data points extracted from primary sources.
Average Michigan prison wages: $12-$16 per month Statistic
Incarcerated people in Michigan prisons earn an average of $12 to $16 per month from prison jobs, depending on their court circumstance and job description.
$12.00 vs. dollars per month (high end)
65% of families with incarcerated loved ones unable to meet basic needs Statistic
According to a survey by the Ella Baker Center, roughly 65 percent of families with a loved one in prison were unable to meet their basic needs because court-related fines and fees sent them into debt of more than $13,000 on average.
65%
Average court-related debt exceeds $13,000 per family Statistic
Court-related fines and fees send families with an incarcerated loved one into debt of more than $13,000 on average, according to the Ella Baker Center.
$13,000
58% of families cannot afford costs associated with conviction Statistic
According to the Prison Policy Initiative, 58 percent of families could not afford 'the costs associated with a conviction.'
58%
Commissary shoes cost $70+ Statistic
The institution offered access to vendors that supply shoes costing more than $70 to incarcerated people via kiosk ordering.
$70.00
Securepak food orders cost up to $150 Statistic
Securepak orders (food items) available to incarcerated people cost up to $150.
$150.00
Tablet costs with entertainment exceed $500 Statistic
A tablet available to incarcerated people, including the purchase of music and games, can be worth more than $500.
$500.00
Footlocker storage costs $150 Statistic
Author paid $150 for an aluminum footlocker from Michigan State Industries to store belongings beyond the one green duffle bag limit per person. Items that cannot fit inside the duffle bag are labeled contraband and destroyed.
$150.00
Mandatory labor in Michigan prisons enforced by threat of solitary Policy
Labor in Michigan prisons is mandatory. Not participating in the job pool could lead the incarcerated person to long-time isolation.
Tariff-driven price increases burden incarcerated people and families since 2025 Trend
Since 2020, incarcerated people have been receiving email blasts explaining price spikes in clothing and food items available from the kiosk. In 2025, the price rose again due to tariff wars, further burdening incarcerated people and their families.
Incarcerated people's property limited to one duffle bag Policy
Incarcerated people in Michigan prisons are limited to one green duffle bag per person. Any item that can't fit inside is labeled contraband and destroyed.
Poorest communities most policed and funneled into prison Finding
The poorest communities are the ones most policed and funneled into prison. A high percentage of incarcerated bodies are poor Black and brown people.
Vendors target families rather than incarcerated people for payment Finding
Vendors offering shoes, food packages, tablets, and other items aim not for the incarcerated person to pay, but their family and friends, given that prison wages of $12-$16/month are wholly insufficient to cover these costs.
Paying debt to society does not repair victims' families Finding
Paying a debt to society has less to do with repairing the victim's family's true desires, especially when both victim and perpetrator are from the same demographics. The author's time and money went to MDOC rather than to victims or communities.
Constitutional provision allows prisoners to be in servitude Legal fact
The United States Constitution declares prisoners to be in servitude, which the author characterizes as being 'a slave to the economic serving of the state.'
Court-ordered fees and restitutions garnished from trust accounts Case detail
Upon sentencing in 2010, court-ordered fees and restitutions were set to be garnished from a trust account set up by the state for the incarcerated person, establishing the economic framework for incarceration from the outset.
Vera Institute launches Incarceration and Inequality Project Data Explorer Finding
Vera's new Incarceration and Inequality Project (IIP) Data Explorer is an interactive tool that gives advocates and policymakers ready access to data on the connection between incarceration and economic indicators—both nationally and within their co…
Quote: Economic exploitation of incarcerated people by MDOC Quote
"My time and money went to MDOC, which makes top dollar off me and other incarcerated people."
Quote: It cost money to be poor Quote
"It cost money to be poor, and it seemed to be a major reason for crime to run rampant in low-income neighborhoods."
Quote: Paying a debt to society has less to do with repairing the victim's family Quote
"Paying a debt to society has less to do with helping or repairing the victim's family's true desires, especially if both victim and perpetrator are from the same demographic."
Quote: Vendors target families not incarcerated people Quote
"Those vendors aim not for the incarcerated person to pay, but their family and friends."
Sources
3 cited sources backing this research.
Primary
Official report
Ella Baker Center survey on families and incarceration costs
Primary
Journalism
Primary
Official report
Prison Policy Initiative: Costs associated with conviction
Key Entities
Organizations, people, facilities, and other named entities referenced in this research.
Demetrius Buckley
[person]
Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
[organization]
Incarceration and Inequality Project
[program]
Michigan Department of Corrections
[organization]
Michigan State Industries
[organization]
Prison Policy Initiative
[organization]
Securepak
[organization]
Vera Institute of Justice
[organization]
Related Topics
Research topics that draw on data from this collection.
Communications & Technology
Georgia's prison communications system is a closed market in which a private-equity-owned duopoly charges families for contact while paying the state commissions, and the state has layered roughly $50 million in managed-access blocking technology and a centralized surveillance apparatus commanding well over $150 million on top of it. Phone-related incidents, cell-phone seizures, and homicides have all risen alongside the spending, and the procurement record behind the largest contracts is absent from every public registry. What families pay — and what the state earns — remains largely undisclosed.
4,084 data points
Legal Standards & Case Law
Georgia's prison conditions are governed by a fifty-year body of Eighth Amendment doctrine — Estelle v. Gamble, Farmer v. Brennan, Wilson v. Seiter, Rhodes v. Chapman, Helling v. McKinney — whose two-part deliberate-indifference test the Eleventh Circuit tightened to the strictest in the nation in Wade v. McDade (2024). Layered on top are the Prison Litigation Reform Act's exhaustion, physical-injury, three-strikes and consent-decree-termination provisions, which reduced the prisoner civil-rights filing rate from 24.6 to 10.5 per 1,000 and leave roughly 1 percent of Eighth Amendment claims succeeding. This page sets out the controlling standards, the Georgia-specific machinery of Guthrie v. Evans, Gumm v. Ford, the Abuse Provision and the four-year habeas deadline, and the gap between what the doctrine requires and what Georgia's prisons deliver.
7,281 data points
Policy & Advocacy
Georgia's policy and advocacy landscape is defined by a decade of bipartisan reform followed by a sharp reversal — the state approved the largest corrections funding increase in its history while leaving every structural driver of its prison crisis in place. A defined reform agenda has emerged around post-conviction repair, parole restoration, independent oversight, sentencing second looks, and market reforms to the commissary and communications extraction economy, but the Georgia General Assembly has never passed an independent prison oversight bill, and no compassionate or geriatric release legislation was introduced in the 2026 session. The 2026 statewide races have become the primary advocacy window, with only 3 of 30+ candidates offering detailed prison reform positions.
5,088 data points
Prison Labor & Economics
Georgia pays incarcerated workers nothing for regular prison jobs, making it one of roughly seven states with a zero-wage prison labor system even as its correctional industries post tens of millions in revenue and its counties capture an estimated $100 million or more annually in free labor. The state then extracts again through a commissary system whose markups run from 67 percent to 1,150 percent above retail, funded almost entirely by families who spend a median of $172 a month and $4,200 a year to keep loved ones fed and clean. The result, documented across 33 GPS research collections, is a closed economic loop running from the 1866 convict lease system to the 2010 prison strike whose nine demands remain unmet as of 2026.
3,864 data points
Racial Disparities
Georgia's prison population is roughly 58 to 61 percent Black in a state that is roughly 31 to 33 percent Black, and the gap is reproduced at every stage of the system — arrest, plea bargaining, probation revocation, life sentencing, solitary confinement, and exoneration. This page synthesizes 23 GPS research collections documenting the disparity's origins in the Black Codes and convict leasing, its present-day mechanics, and the significant gaps in the data used to measure it.
2,134 data points
Recidivism & Reentry
Georgia sizes its reentry system with a single narrow number — felony reconviction within three years of release — which runs roughly 25 to 27 percent and excludes rearrests, technical violations, offending after year three, and the people who die inside the window. Measured the way the federal government measures it, 83 percent of people released from state prisons are rearrested within nine years, and Georgia's 2022 release cohort posted the highest reconviction rate in GDC's published series. Meanwhile the parole valve has narrowed 42 percent in five years, 54.55 percent of calendar-year 2025 releases left with no supervision at all, and death risk in the first two weeks after release runs 12.7 times the general population rate.
8,139 data points
Solitary Confinement
Georgia's solitary confinement system is not a single unit but a four-program architecture — Tier I, Tier II, the Tier III Special Management Unit, and two STEP step-down programs — operating inside ordinary prisons statewide, plus a separate restrictive-housing program for children. The Georgia Department of Corrections publishes no population count for any of it except the SMU, which appears as a facility row only because it happens to be a standalone unit holding 149 to 195 people. The documented record shows a system built at a scale of thousands of Tier beds, in which the one unit whose conditions federal litigation reformed is the smallest and most protected part.
1,428 data points