Truth in Sentencing Broke Parole. Georgia Is Paying the Price.

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

In 1994, Georgia adopted the 85% truth-in-sentencing framework — a policy sold as tough, smart, and necessary for public safety.

What the public never saw was the long-term cost: a parole system stripped of purpose, prisons filled beyond capacity, and a level of violence so severe that the U.S. Department of Justice declared Georgia among the worst prison systems in America.

Our main investigation — Georgia’s $40 Billion Mistake — exposed the financial and human catastrophe created by these policies.

This article focuses on one of the central pillars of that failure: how Truth in Sentencing quietly dismantled parole and helped create the crisis Georgia now faces.

What Parole Was Designed to Do

Parole is not leniency — it is a public-safety tool.

It exists to:

  • Reward growth, rehabilitation, and program completion
  • Reduce recidivism by releasing people with supervision, not abruptly at the door
  • Free up prison capacity for those who truly pose a danger
  • Help older, low-risk people return to their families
  • Incentivize good behavior inside prisons, reducing violence

When used correctly, parole lowers crime, lowers costs, and protects the public.

Georgia once used it that way. Then everything changed.

Truth in Sentencing Took a Sledgehammer to Parole

When Georgia embraced “85% truth in sentencing,” politicians claimed it would deter crime.

In reality, it:

  • Delayed parole eligibility for most people
  • Eliminated incentives that kept prisons safer
  • Created massive backlogs of people stuck years beyond their earliest eligibility
  • Increased the average age of the prison population
  • Caused medical costs to explode
  • Removed the safety valve that kept prisons flexible and manageable

As documented in Georgia’s $40 Billion Mistake, the state traded $82 million in federal incentive grants for a long-term bill approaching $40 billion in incarceration costs.

Georgia locked itself into an aging, overcrowded, violent system — all while disabling the one mechanism built to relieve pressure.

The Domino Effect: What Happens When Parole Stops Working

With eligibility pushed back and the parole board granting fewer releases, the system entered a collapse:

More time served → More violence

People with no hope of parole have nothing to lose. Assaults, extortion, and gang recruitment increase dramatically when incentives disappear.

Older population → Higher medical costs

Georgia now has one of the oldest prison populations in America. Chronic illness, disability, dialysis, cancer treatment — all skyrocketed after TIS.

Overcrowding → Constant lockdowns

With parole throttled, dorms filled well beyond safe levels. Chronic lockdowns became the norm, making rehabilitation impossible.

Collapsed staffing → Zero supervision

As revealed in our reporting on Dooly and Washington State Prisons, many housing units have no officer present for hours, sometimes entire shifts.

Parole hearings became symbolic

Thousands wait years between hearings, and decisions often lack transparency or written justification.

The result: violence climbed, costs exploded, and public safety declined.

The Myth of Safety: Truth in Sentencing Made Georgia Less Safe

TIS was sold as a crime-prevention policy.

But research — and Georgia’s own DOJ-confirmed reality — shows the opposite:

  • Long, inflexible sentences do not deter crime
  • People released at their max-out date have higher recidivism because they get no supervision
  • Violence inside prisons increases when there are no incentives to complete programs
  • Overcrowded prisons become training grounds for gangs, not correctional institutions
  • States with strong parole systems see better outcomes at lower cost

Georgia didn’t get “tough on crime.”

Georgia got dumber, poorer, and vastly more dangerous.

The Fix Is Clear: Restore Parole as a Safety Valve

Georgia doesn’t need to experiment — the blueprint already exists.

The Georgia Legislature should adopt these reforms:

1. Presumptive Parole

If someone meets behavioral, programming, and risk criteria, release is presumed unless the board proves otherwise.

2. Mandatory Annual Hearings

No more 3–8 year gaps between reviews.

3. Written Decisions

People deserve to know why they were denied and what they must do to succeed.

4. Independent Oversight

A small board operating in complete secrecy cannot be trusted with decisions affecting thousands of families and billions of dollars.

5. Early Release for Elderly and Terminally Ill People

No public-safety benefit exists in keeping them locked in overcrowded dorms.

6. Align Parole With Evidence-Based Risk Assessment

Release decisions should be grounded in data, not politics.

These reforms form the core of our upcoming legislative proposal:

The Second Chance Parole Reform Act of 2026.

Georgia’s 2026 Legislative Session: A Second Chance for Real Parole Reform

Call to Action: Demand a Real Parole System in Georgia

Georgia’s prison crisis is no accident — it is the predictable result of policies that valued politics over people, money over safety, and punishment over reality.

Now it’s time to undo the damage.

Take action right now:

  1. Use ImpactJustice.AI to contact decision-makers.

Tell the Georgia Parole Board, Governor Kemp, and your legislators that:

  • Parole must be transparent
  • Parole must be mandatory and reviewable
  • Parole must serve public safety, not political talking points
  1. Share this investigation.

Public pressure changes laws.

  1. Support parole reform during the 2026 legislative session.

Georgia cannot afford another year of this failure.


Further Reading

To understand how Georgia arrived at this crisis — and what real reform looks like — explore these investigations, policy analyses, and companion reports:

Core GPS Investigations

Policy & Reform Context

Authoritative External Sources


GPS

2 thoughts on “Truth in Sentencing Broke Parole. Georgia Is Paying the Price.”

  1. My son just went to a parole revocation hearing in which the state had ONE witness who testified using nothing but hearsay and ZERO EVIDENCE and they withheld exculpatory evidence from us until AFTER the hearing. Now my sons has to wait longer for his Habeas Hearing, all the while spending more money on attorney fees. And the attorneys, one specifically told us that she would not file a motion to compel (we knew they had evidence to discredit the state’s only witness) because she didn’t want to “piss off the solicitor”. The parole system is biased and unfair. That was easy to see by the single board member that was the judge, jury, and hangman that day. He had his mind made up before we even got started. Don’t try and make me believe that his findings and recommendation went before 4 other board members because they all can’t be that blind and stupid.

    Reply
    • We’re so sorry your son — and your whole family — had to go through that. What you described is exactly what we hear from families all over Georgia: revocation hearings where guilt is assumed, hearsay is treated like evidence, and the decision is made long before anyone walks in the room.

      A single board representative acting as judge, jury, and executioner is not justice — it’s procedure designed for speed and convenience, not truth. And you’re right to question the so-called “review” by the full Board. In practice, many families report the same thing: rubber-stamp decisions made without meaningful examination of facts, evidence, or due process.

      Withholding exculpatory evidence until after the hearing is not only unethical — it may be a constitutional violation, because the Parole Board must give the accused a meaningful opportunity to challenge the allegations.

      The attorney refusing to file a motion because she “didn’t want to piss off the solicitor” is another sign of how deeply corrupted and fear-based this system is. No one should have to walk into a courtroom already knowing the outcome.

      You are absolutely right: the parole system is biased, unfair, and structured to uphold whatever narrative the state brings — even when it’s built on hearsay, bad witnesses, or zero evidence at all.

      If you want, you are welcome to share more details with us privately. Many families are dealing with the same violations, and we are working to expose how revocations, denials, and “one-member hearings” are used to control people instead of rehabilitating them.

      Your son deserved a fair hearing.
      Not a performance. Not a preset outcome.
      A fair, legal hearing.

      And you are not alone in this fight.

      — Georgia Prisoners’ Speak
      https://GPS.press

      Reply

Leave a Comment