HomeResearch Library › Reassessing Progress in Implementing Georgia's Youthful Offender Act: 1978 (NCJ 67769, 1978)
Sentencing

Reassessing Progress in Implementing Georgia's Youthful Offender Act: 1978 (NCJ 67769, 1978)

167 Data Points 6 Sources 38 Entities Research Date: Sep 6, 2026
This 1978 Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation evaluation of the Youthful Offender Act (YOA) finds the program has become routinized in a traditional prison mold, with fragmented pre-release services, no cohesive departmental philosophy, and inadequate attention to young women offenders. Recidivism data show YOA participants had a 27.5% three-year return-to-prison rate for FY74-75 releasees, with one-year rates rising from roughly 7% to 13% across FY74-FY76 exit cohorts, suggesting program effects may be wearing off. The report recommends full implementation of the Act, separation of youthful offenders from the general adult population throughout their correctional experience, and creation of a dedicated Youthful Offender Program director position.
27.5% YOA three-year return-to-prison rate FY74-75
14 Average incarceration length for Youthful Offende…
25% YOA two-year return-to-prison rate under one four…
12% YOA one-year return-to-prison rate FY74-76
9.6% GII overall one-year return-to-prison rate
12.5% GII Vocational Rehabilitation one-year return-to-…

Key Findings

The most impactful data from this research collection.

All Data Points

167 verified data points extracted from primary sources.

Youthful Offender Act age range Legal fact
The Youthful Offender Act of 1972 (as amended) provides for the use of an 'alternative penal' for younger offenders ages seventeen through twenty-four.
legal policy demographics
Close security classification policy for Youthful Offenders Finding
For purposes of initial classification, Youthful Offenders are considered to have a sentence of six years. The result of this policy decision is that a typical Youthful Offender who spends an average 14 months incarcerated serves nearly half that ti…
classification policy youthful_offenders facilities
YOA three-year return-to-prison rate FY74-75 Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for Youthful Offenders released during fiscal years 1974 and 1975 was 27.5%.
27.5%
recidivism youthful_offender facilities
Youthful Offender Act rehabilitative services specification Legal fact
The rehabilitative services specified in the Youthful Offender Act are 'corrective and preventive incarceration, guidance and training designed to protect the public by correcting the anti-social tendencies of youthful offenders, which may include b…
legal policy reentry
Average incarceration length for Youthful Offenders Statistic
A typical Youthful Offender spends an average of 14 months incarcerated.
14 months
youthful_offenders facilities operations
YOA two-year return-to-prison rate under one fourth Statistic
Less than one fourth of the Youthful Offenders released during fiscal years 1974 and 1975 were back in Georgia prisons after two years 'on the street.'
25%
recidivism youthful_offender
Release authority designated in Youthful Offender Act Legal fact
The Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole is designated as the release authority in the Youthful Offender Act, and subsequent events have placed conditional release supervision responsibilities under that board as well.
legal parole policy
Close security definition under Departmental Rules Legal fact
Departmental Rules (Chapter 125-2-4-.02) define close security as: 'Inmates assigned to this category are suspected escape risks, alcohol or drug addicts, nonconformists, habitual rule violators, sex offenders, unreliables and those against whom det…
classification policy legal facilities
YOA one-year return-to-prison rate FY74-76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for Youthful Offenders was 12.0% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976.
12%
recidivism youthful_offender
Six release categories under Youthful Offender Program Policy
The system of 'release categories' utilized by the Board of Pardons and Parole and the Youthful Offender Division suggests a continuum of supervision options. The first three of six possible 'categories' call for no term of imprisonment at all: (I) …
policy parole reentry operations
Security reduction waiting period for inmates with sentences of five years or more Policy
According to criteria spelled out in a directive from Offender Administration, any inmate having a sentence of five years or more must serve at least six months before receiving a security reduction from 'close' to 'medium' or from 'medium' to 'mini…
classification policy facilities
GII overall one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for Georgia Industrial Institute (GII) overall was 9.6% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976.
9.6%
recidivism facilities
Diagnostics performed at two institutions Finding
Diagnostics are performed at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center (GDCC) and at the Georgia Earned Release Center (GERC). The addition of a supplemental diagnostic function at GERC has had the effect of extending the diagnostic period.
operations facilities policy
Close security classification despite low risk assessment Finding
Even a cursory file review turns up inmates who are not adjudged a security risk after a formal psychological assessment and yet are assigned a close security classification. Repeated efforts on the part of institutional staff to have these individu…
classification policy youthful_offenders
GII Vocational Rehabilitation one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for GII Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) clients was 12.5% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976.
12.5%
recidivism vocational_rehabilitation facilities
Thirty-day intake processing policy at GDCC Policy
The requirement that offenders stay only up to thirty days at GDCC is an agency policy and is no longer required under the Youthful Offender Act. The Act specifies that 'In the absence of exceptional circumstances, each study and diagnosis shall be …
policy operations legal
60-day diagnostic program structure Finding
The 60-day diagnostic program is conducted in two phases: the first at GDCC (Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center) and the second at the prison to which the youthful offender is assigned. The second phase is an essentially diagnostic time du…
classification operations youthful_offenders methodology
Other LT 25 one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for offenders under 25 at institutions other than GII or GERC was 10.9% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976.
10.9%
recidivism youthful_offender
Youthful Offender Act diagnostic completion period Legal fact
The Youthful Offender Act specifies that 'In the absence of exceptional circumstances, each study and diagnosis shall be completed within a period of sixty days from the date of commitment.' Originally the act read '30 days'.
legal operations
Vocational assignment accuracy concern Finding
Individual staff members have observed that vocational assignments based heavily on test scores lack the accuracy and dependability of trial assignment and feedback from the individual offender on his initial interest in the trade.
classification operations youthful_offenders vocational_training
YOA two-year return-to-prison rate FY74-75 Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for Youthful Offenders was 23.4% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974 and 1975.
23.4%
recidivism youthful_offender
Diversion potential of Youthful Offender Program unutilized Finding
Under the present system of only cursory individual assessment at GDCC and with the current expectation of continued diagnostics at GERC, the use of the diversion potential of the Program goes unutilized. The guidelines of the Youthful Offender Prog…
operations policy reentry
Diagnostic process needs reevaluation Finding
The diagnostic process used in the Youthful Offender Program needs a thorough reevaluation, especially in terms of gearing community and prison services to offender needs rather than vice versa. As now constituted, the process routinely addresses th…
classification operations youthful_offenders policy
GII overall two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for Georgia Industrial Institute overall was 20.0% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974 and 1975.
20%
recidivism facilities
Youthful Offender Act institutional assignment examples Legal fact
The Youthful Offender Act cites several examples of institutions consistent with the 'alternative penalty' goals of the Act: '... minimum security institutions including training schools, hospitals, farms, forestry and other camps, including vocatio…
legal facilities policy
Youthful Offender Contract drafting process Policy
Contracts are drafted by the correctional counselors at the youthful offender institutions. The categories are applied through the use of criminal history criteria, and a representative of the Parole Board interacts with the Director of the Youthful…
policy operations youthful_offenders parole
GII VR two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for GII Vocational Rehabilitation clients was 22.1% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974 and 1975.
22.1%
recidivism vocational_rehabilitation facilities
GERC not envisioned as Youthful Offender institution Finding
The institutions to which the prospective Youthful Offenders would be assigned under the legislation itself were not maximum security prisons like GERC.
facilities policy operations
Contract stipulations format Policy
The stipulations noted in the Contract are stated in terms of program performance goals and general adjustment behaviors to be exhibited by the individual offender. These specifics follow the form of the goals 'to successfully complete the welding t…
policy youthful_offenders operations
Other LT 25 two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for offenders under 25 at institutions other than GII or GERC was 18.3% for offenders released during fiscal years 1974 and 1975.
18.3%
recidivism youthful_offender
Contracting-for-release structure Policy
The agency and the Parole Board have determined that a form of contracting-for-release provides the structure and motivation needed for effective self-rehabilitation on the part of the Youthful Offender.
policy operations reentry
Contract extension for failure to meet terms Policy
Inability to meet the terms of the Contract results in an extension of the period of time to be served in prison. This may take the form of more time to meet the positive goals or may be a punishment for exhibiting prohibited behaviors. Three-month …
policy youthful_offenders operations parole
GII overall three-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for Georgia Industrial Institute overall was 29.6% for offenders released during fiscal year 1974.
29.6%
recidivism facilities
Youthful Offender Act treatment recommendation provision Legal fact
The Youthful Offender Act provides: 'The Director shall forward to the Division a report of the results of the study and diagnosis with respect to each such youthful offender and his recommendations as to the treatment (to) be afforded such offender…
legal operations policy
GTDC academic program completion rate FY77 Statistic
One-half of all academic terminations are successes at GTDC while only 31% are successes at GIl. Vocationally, these two institutions show 47% and 9%, respectively.
50% vs. GIl academic completion rate
education vocational_training youthful_offenders facilities
GII VR three-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for GII Vocational Rehabilitation clients was 27.3% for offenders released during fiscal year 1974.
27.3%
recidivism vocational_rehabilitation facilities
Contract negotiation process in Operational Guidelines Policy
The 'Operational Guidelines' interpret the second thirty-day assessment period to be the time at which '... training and treatment objectives are prescribed, the inmate prepares a plan for himself, and a contract is negotiated involving the inmate, …
policy operations
GTDC vocational program completion rate FY77 Statistic
GTDC showed a 47.4% vocational program completion rate in State FY77, compared to 9.1% at GIl.
47.4% vs. GIl vocational completion rate
vocational_training youthful_offenders facilities
Other LT 25 three-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for offenders under 25 at institutions other than GII or GERC was 21.5% for offenders released during fiscal year 1974.
21.5%
recidivism youthful_offender
Routinization of YOA practice around traditional prison model Finding
This evaluator's impression of the program is that the routinization of YOA practice has solidified around the traditional prison model of rehabilitation programs and prescribed 'treatment' more generally. The documents which define and interpret th…
operations policy conditions
Higher program completion rates at YOA institutions Finding
Analysis of these data suggests that the successful completion rates for current and former YOA institutions exceed those for other prisons which operate well organized educational programs.
education vocational_training youthful_offenders facilities
YOA one-year recidivism rates rising across exit cohorts Trend
One-year return-to-prison rates for YOA exit cohorts were roughly 7%, 12%, and 13% for fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976 respectively, showing a rising trend.
recidivism youthful_offender trend
Original indeterminate sentence under Youthful Offender Program Policy
The Youthful Offender Program originally operated with an indeterminant sentence. Contracted releases were approved in advance by the Division and actual release was finalized by a Youthful Offender 'Board'.
policy legal operations
Group counseling emphasis in YO Program Finding
A distinct feature of this program's counseling component has been a greater use of group counseling compared with other prisons. Actual 'therapeutic communities' have operated at times in the dormitories of the YOA institutions, especially during t…
mental_health drugs youthful_offenders operations
GII VR one-year recidivism rates rising sharply Trend
One-year return-to-prison rates for GII Vocational Rehabilitation clients rose from 10% to 13% to 20% for fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976 exit cohorts respectively, described as 'perhaps the most alarming' change.
recidivism vocational_rehabilitation trend
Youthful Offender Act conditional release provision Legal fact
The Youthful Offender Act provides: 'When, in the judgment of the Director, a committed youthful offender should be released conditionally upon supervision, he shall so report and recommend to the Division. Upon receipt of such recommendation or, if…
legal parole reentry
Walker CI disciplinary report rate FY77 Statistic
Walker Correctional Institute had a disciplinary report rate of 120.2 per 1,000 inmate population during 1977, the highest among institutions serving younger offenders, representing a 10.3% increase over FY76.
120.2 reports per 1,000 inmates
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
GII overall one-year recidivism rate stable around 10% Trend
The one-year return-to-prison rate for GII overall hovered around the 10% figure each year for fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976 exit cohorts.
recidivism facilities trend
Board of Pardons and Parole initiated six release categories in October 1975 Policy
In October of 1975, the Board of Pardons and Parole initiated the system of six release categories. The six categories specify the length of contracts allowed for each offender in the category and itemize the criteria by which individuals are assign…
policy parole operations
GTDC disciplinary report rate FY77 Statistic
GTDC had a disciplinary report rate of 113.4 per 1,000 inmate population during 1977, representing a 33.7% decrease over FY76.
113.4 reports per 1,000 inmates
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
Other LT 25 one-year recidivism rates rising Trend
One-year return-to-prison rates for younger inmates leaving neither GERC nor GII increased from roughly 8% to 10% to 11% for fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976 exit cohorts respectively.
recidivism youthful_offender trend
Release category criteria entirely criminal history based Finding
The criteria for the six release categories -- which are entirely criminal history based -- determine the time that each offender will be incarcerated. The only 'margin of error' in this determination would be the options of special early release or…
policy parole operations legal
GERC disciplinary report rate FY77 Statistic
GERC had a disciplinary report rate of 109.3 per 1,000 inmate population during 1977, representing a 38.0% increase over FY76.
109.3 reports per 1,000 inmates
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
Specialized programs losing ground relative to conventional treatment Finding
Looking at return-to-prison rates for younger offenders in each of the years FY74, FY75, and FY76 exit cohorts, the specialized YOA and VR programs seem to be 'losing ground' relative to the remainder of the prison population in this age group. Two-…
recidivism youthful_offender vocational_rehabilitation trend
Indeterminate sentence converted to determinate contract-specified sentence Finding
In this manner, the indeterminant sentence has been converted into a determinant, contract-specified sentence. These changes were codified in the 1975 amendments to the Act, at least to the extent that release authority residing with the Parole Boar…
policy legal parole
Lee CI disciplinary report rate FY77 Statistic
Lee Correctional Institute had a disciplinary report rate of 105.5 per 1,000 inmate population during 1977, representing an 11.3% increase over FY76.
105.5 reports per 1,000 inmates
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
Caution urged on recidivism over time findings Methodology note
The report recommends considerable caution in the use of 'recidivism over time' findings, noting the data represent relatively few points in time and are subject to many possible sources of data error.
recidivism methodology data_gap
Youthful Offender Program lacks envisioned reforms Finding
Compared to the apparent agency purpose and legislative intent of the program, the Youthful Offender Program appears to lack the envisioned reforms in correctional practice. More particularly, the individually oriented indeterminant sentence based o…
policy operations conditions
GIl disciplinary report rate FY77 Statistic
Georgia Industrial Institute had a disciplinary report rate of 102.4 per 1,000 inmate population during 1977, representing a 34.4% increase over FY76.
102.4 reports per 1,000 inmates
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
GERC one-year return-to-prison rate FY76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for GERC (Georgia Evaluation and Rehabilitation Center) based on the last three quarters' exits for FY76 was 15.5%.
15.5%
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
Youthful Offender Program rehabilitative philosophy Finding
The emphasis of the program on basic academic skills and vocational capabilities suggests that the rehabilitative philosophy at work is that which views the acquisition of competitive skills and conventional work attitudes as conducive to an alterna…
policy reentry operations
YOA institutions within norms for disciplinary reports Finding
Neither disciplinary reports nor use of force reports suggest that YOA's 'act out' or 'cause problems' at a rate different from other younger offenders. The daily scheduling and routine of the YO Program operate within the norms and expectations of …
violence youthful_offenders operations facilities
GTDC one-year return-to-prison rate FY76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for Georgia Training and Development Center (GTDC) based on FY76 exits was 12.9%.
12.9%
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
Release contingent upon program completion Policy
The Youthful Offender Program attempts to channel the principal motivating factor of incarceration, the desire to be released from prison, in the effort to provide effective programs and services. This is done by making release contingent upon compl…
policy operations reentry
GIl use of force report rate FY77 Statistic
Georgia Industrial Institute had 60 use of force reports during FY77, with a rate of .044 based on average monthly population, compared to 61 reports and a rate of .050 in FY76.
0.0 reports per inmate vs. FY76 rate
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
Walker CI one-year return-to-prison rate FY76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for Walker Correctional Institution based on FY76 exits was 13.1%.
13.1%
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
Earlier evaluation found contracts one-sided Finding
A previous evaluation of the Youthful Offender Program (Elizabeth Knott and John Doughtie, Evaluation of Georgia's Youthful Offender Program, DOR, November 1, 1975, pp. 22-25) observed that the contracts were 'rather one-sided documents' and questio…
policy operations conditions
GERC use of force report rate FY77 Statistic
Georgia Evaluation and Reception Center had 6 use of force reports during FY77 (based on 6 months data, figure is an estimate), with a rate of .026 based on average monthly population, compared to 17 reports and a rate of .041 in FY76.
0.0 reports per inmate vs. FY76 rate
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
Lee CI one-year return-to-prison rate FY76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for Lee Correctional Institution based on FY76 exits was 10.7%.
10.7%
recidivism facilities
Quote: Contracts as attempt to 'con' inmates Quote
From the 1975 evaluation: 'Given the skepticism and apprehension with which many youthful offenders probably view the system already, and given their frequently unrealistic (positive) expectations about the program, it seems possible that they will …
policy operations conditions
Walker CI use of force report rate FY77 Statistic
Walker Correctional Institute had 7 use of force reports during FY77, with a rate of .023 based on average monthly population, compared to 7 reports and a rate of .022 in FY76.
0.0 reports per inmate vs. FY76 rate
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
Montgomery CI one-year return-to-prison rate FY76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for Montgomery Correctional Institution based on FY76 exits was 8.9%.
8.9%
recidivism facilities
Contracting may reinforce adaptive or manipulative behavior Finding
The contracting processes of 1975 and 1977 may each reinforce either highly adaptive behavior or highly manipulative behavior, two features often associated with the youthful 'hangers-on' and clique leaders who seek gratification through criminal pu…
operations conditions gangs
GTDC use of force report rate FY77 Statistic
Georgia Training and Development Center had 4 use of force reports during FY77, with a rate of .018 based on average monthly population, compared to 3 reports and a rate of .014 in FY76.
0.0 reports per inmate vs. FY76 rate
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
GII overall one-year return-to-prison rate FY76 Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for GII overall based on FY76 exits was 9.9%.
9.9%
recidivism facilities
Performance-based release theme 1972-1976 Finding
The motivational theory which apparently 'stands behind' the use of a contracting-for-release process in the Youthful Offender Program is a theme familiar to those who have followed the agency's public pronouncements in the years 1972-1976: performa…
policy operations reentry
Montgomery CI use of force report rate FY77 Statistic
Montgomery Correctional Institute had 3 use of force reports during FY77, with a rate of .009 based on average monthly population, compared to 5 reports and a rate of .015 in FY76.
0.0 reports per inmate vs. FY76 rate
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
GERC three-year return-to-prison rate FY74 Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for GERC based on FY74 exits was 24.6%.
24.6%
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
Contracting practice highly directive and prison-program oriented Finding
The Youthful Offender Program's contracting process is highly directive and oriented to available prison programs. The identification of offenders' needs is restricted to those areas in which the prisons currently conduct programs.
operations policy conditions
Lee CI use of force report rate FY77 Statistic
Lee Correctional Institute had 1 use of force report during FY77, with a rate of .005 based on average monthly population, compared to 16 reports and a rate of .080 in FY76.
0.0 reports per inmate vs. FY76 rate
violence facilities operations youthful_offenders
GTDC three-year return-to-prison rate FY74 Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for GTDC based on FY74 exits was 17.8%.
17.8%
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
Low offender participation in needs assessment Finding
Not only does the 'diagnostic' process address a limited spectrum of needs, but the low level of participation of the individual offender in the needs assessment phase presents few opportunities for him or her to object to their 'institutionalizatio…
operations conditions policy
Youthful Offender Act documentation requirement Legal fact
The Youthful Offender Act specifies only one item of documentation that is required for this particular population: 'a report of the results of the study and diagnosis with respect to each such youthful offender and, [the Director's] recommendations…
legal youthful_offenders policy
Walker CI three-year return-to-prison rate FY74 Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for Walker Correctional Institution based on FY74 exits was 23.2%.
23.2%
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
Contracts worded in terms of institution's needs Finding
Those few general phrases potentially addressing the 'whole person' needs of the individual which are found in current contracts are carefully worded in terms of the institution's needs (e.g., 'satisfactory institutional adjustment').
operations conditions policy
ETS case management documents Policy
The Earned Time System case management documents include: (1) Intake and Extended Assessment; (2) the Supervisor's Evaluation, a quarterly assessment of the inmate's 'activity' performance; (3) the Performance Exception Report, an optional monthly d…
policy operations youthful_offenders
Lee CI three-year return-to-prison rate FY74 Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for Lee Correctional Institution based on FY74 exits was 18.1%.
18.1%
recidivism facilities
Youthful offenders taught docility and uniformity Finding
Rather than being prepared as individuals in a competitive world, youthful offenders are taught docility. Rather than being shown how to appreciate their own creativity, they are taught uniformity. Rather than being reconciled to community expectati…
conditions operations reentry
Concurrent 60-day deadlines for YO counselors Finding
Staff at Youthful Offender institutions must comply both with legal requirements that the intake 'diagnosis' be completed within 60 days 'from the date of commitment' and with ETS procedures specifying that the Extended Assessment and Performance Pl…
operations youthful_offenders policy staffing
GII overall three-year return-to-prison rate FY74 Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for GII overall based on FY74 exits was 29.6%.
29.6%
recidivism facilities
Initial diagnostic process identical to general inmate intake Finding
The initial phase of the youthful offenders' diagnostic process is almost identical to that provided for all incoming inmates: medical needs screening, orientation briefings, initial counseling interview, vocational and aptitude testing, psychologic…
operations medical mental_health
Extended Assessment backlog for Youthful Offenders Statistic
22% of Youthful Offenders presently eligible for the practical observation period (Extended Assessment) are, instead, in a holding pattern at the assigned institution awaiting additional testing. Put another way, only 78% of Youthful Offenders eligi…
22%
operations youthful_offenders classification data_gap
YOA institutions one-year rates range 13-15.5% in FY76 Finding
Data from FY76 show return rates for YOA prisons to range from 13% to 15.5% while those for roughly similar institutions range from 9% to 11%.
recidivism youthful_offender facilities
No non-institutional assignment recommendation in five-year program history Finding
Assignment recommendation would assume new meaning if, in fact, the recommendation was ever a non-institutional one: that has not been the case during the Program's five-year existence.
operations policy reentry
Missing diagnostic data for female Youthful Offenders Finding
The lack of requisite diagnostic data is particularly evident in the files of the 14 female Youthful Offenders housed at Georgia Women's Correctional Institute. Six of these women have been incarcerated for more than six months each with no Intake o…
data_gap youthful_offenders classification women operations
Higher YOA one-year rates attributed to universal parole surveillance Finding
The higher one-year return-to-prison rates for YOA institutions seem to be largely a result of the universal parole surveillance provided for YOAs which is not provided for all other younger offenders leaving the system. Evidence for this conclusion…
recidivism parole youthful_offender supervision
Security classification policy memorandum date Policy
Security classification decisions are predicated upon a policy memorandum dated February 15, 1977 from the Deputy Commissioner of Offender Rehabilitation.
policy operations
Supervisor's Evaluation quality concerns Finding
The Supervisor's Evaluations (SEs) seem to exhibit a similar quality problem to those reviewed at other institutions: with several notable exceptions the entries are one-liners that do not convey a great deal about the inmate in a behaviorally objec…
operations youthful_offenders data_gap methodology
70% of youthful offenders avoiding return after three years Statistic
As many as 70% of youthful offenders appear to be coping and avoiding return to prison after three years.
70%
recidivism youthful_offender parole
Performance Exception Report as game for inmates Finding
At GERC as at many other institutions staff members question the value of a motivator so dependent upon the personality of the individual supervisor. Earning a phone call or an extra visit thus assumes the quality of a game: students badger teachers…
operations youthful_offenders policy
YOA conditional releasees disproportionately parole violators Finding
Since all YOAs are placed on conditional release, they constitute a disproportionate number of parole violators and are more frequently before the Board of Pardons and Parole for revocation hearings.
parole youthful_offender supervision recidivism
External vs internal motivation concern in YO Program Finding
The Y.O. program provides management and staff with a powerful control mechanism in the form of the contract, and ETS provides the inmate with a way to manipulate that program. Finally each system motivates from the outside and little time remains f…
youthful_offenders operations policy mental_health
FY72 parole award rate Statistic
In FY72, over half (55.5%) of those considered for parole were awarded this form of release.
55.5%
parole policy
Quarterly Review Summary lacks detail Finding
While the Quarterly Review Summary undoubtedly provides some ongoing information about the inmate's program involvement, the detailed account of activities envisioned in Earned Time procedures does not seem to be present.
operations youthful_offenders data_gap
FY73 parole award rate Statistic
In FY73, 48.2% of those considered for parole were awarded this form of release.
48.2%
parole policy
Paperwork burden obstructs service delivery Finding
With documentation responsibilities laid upon them by two service delivery systems, case managers and program staff must channel much of their energy to meeting legal and procedural deadlines. The result is that the very process--case management--th…
operations youthful_offenders staffing policy
FY74 parole award rate Statistic
In FY74, 45.4% of those considered for parole were awarded this form of release.
45.4%
parole policy
Pre-release center assignment based on family residence Policy
When the correctional counselor is in the process of drawing up a Y.O. contract, one of the variables considered is the offender's post-release plans. If evidence exists that the family intends to provide the offender with a place of residence, the …
policy youthful_offenders reentry operations
FY75 parole award rate Statistic
In FY75, 40.4% of those considered for parole were awarded this form of release.
40.4%
parole policy
Institutional pre-release curriculum Policy
The offender who falls into the first category (post-release residence with family) is required in his contract to complete a pre-release curriculum of consumer education at the institution. This program typically includes personal finance matters s…
policy youthful_offenders reentry operations
FY76 parole award rate Statistic
In FY76, 30.0% of those considered for parole were awarded this form of release.
30%
parole policy
Pre-release center waiting period up to two months Statistic
Since current practice is to manage the population of any one center so that Youthful Offenders are proportionately represented, the inmate may wait at the institution for as long as two months before an opening occurs at a pre-release center.
2 months
reentry youthful_offenders operations facilities
Declining parole award rates trend FY72-FY76 Trend
Parole award rates declined steadily from 55.5% in FY72 to 30.0% in FY76, a trend the report says brings into serious question the efficiency of continually more restrictive parole practice.
parole policy trend
Pre-release center managers reluctant to accept YOs Finding
Managers and staff both perceive the Youthful Offender population as being considerably more rambunctious and, consequently, more in need of discipline than other inmates. These special personal needs, when coupled with additional paperwork requirem…
reentry youthful_offenders operations facilities
FY72 parolee one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY72 was 3.5%.
3.5%
parole recidivism
Contract renegotiation at pre-release centers Finding
Once the inmate arrives at the center, his Youthful Offender contract usually must be re-negotiated in order to reflect his minimum stay at the center. In most cases this is the first time that the inmate has been apprised of the need for this trans…
reentry youthful_offenders operations policy
FY73 parolee one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY73 was 3.6%.
3.6%
parole recidivism
Offender perception of contract renegotiation as system game Quote
Several staff at pre-release centers report that offenders perceive this as one more example of the system reneging on the terms of its own agreement and 'running a game' on them again.
reentry youthful_offenders operations
FY74 parolee one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY74 was 4.6%.
4.6%
parole recidivism
Inconsistent pre-release contract renegotiation policy Finding
One pre-release manager suggests that Departmental policy may simply be unclear on this matter. At that center contracts are only re-negotiated when the inmate does not fulfill the requirements of the center's own contract. Still another manager rep…
reentry youthful_offenders policy operations
FY75 parolee one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY75 was 5.8%.
5.8%
parole recidivism
FY76 parolee one-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The one-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY76 was 5.3%.
5.3%
parole recidivism
FY72 parolee two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY72 was 9.1%.
9.1%
parole recidivism
FY73 parolee two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY73 was 10.3%.
10.3%
parole recidivism
FY74 parolee two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY74 was 12.2%.
12.2%
parole recidivism
FY75 parolee two-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The two-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY75 was 12.7%.
12.7%
parole recidivism
FY72 parolee three-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY72 was 12.8%.
12.8%
parole recidivism
FY73 parolee three-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY73 was 15.5%.
15.5%
parole recidivism
FY74 parolee three-year return-to-prison rate Statistic
The three-year return-to-prison rate for parolees leaving in FY74 was 17.3%.
17.3%
parole recidivism
Parolee return rates climbing as parole awards decline Trend
In FY72, paroles were awarded to 55.5% of those considered and the three-year return-to-prison rate was 12.8%. In FY74, paroles had fallen to 45% and the return rate had climbed to 17%. Examination of shorter tracking period data for FY75 and FY76 s…
parole recidivism trend policy
YOA program routinized in traditional prison mold Finding
The Youthful Offender Program seems to have become routinized in a traditional prison mold which significantly limits the effectiveness of the program. Diagnostic processes do not operate to enhance the diversion potential of the program.
youthful_offender policy operations
Pre-release services virtually non-existent for youthful offenders Finding
Pre-release services for the general adult population are fragmented and limited, but these programs are virtually non-existent for the Youthful Offenders in the state.
youthful_offender reentry services data_gap
Central administration for YOA program severely limited Finding
Central administration and planning for fully developing the programmatic aspects of the Youthful Offender Program are severely limited. High echelon staff consume inordinately large amounts of time reviewing and negotiating contracts with other sta…
youthful_offender operations policy staffing
Young women offenders' needs unaddressed Finding
The needs of women Youthful Offenders are not addressed by either the current women's program or the current YO Program. Until diagnostic information is developed and synthesized for this group of younger women, their needs will likely continue to g…
youthful_offender women data_gap policy
Recommendation to implement rather than repeal YOA Finding
From time to time, staff within the agency recommend that the Youthful Offender Act be repealed. The report recommends that it be implemented, noting that actions taken in the name of implementation have had beneficial effects: case management proce…
youthful_offender policy legal
Recommendation for Board transfer of volunteer young offenders into YO Program Policy
The report recommends that DOR and the Parole Board institute a methodology for Board transfer of selected, volunteer young offenders into the YO Program, supplementing the population which the judiciary is sentencing under the Act.
youthful_offender policy transfers parole
Recommendation for dedicated YO Program director Policy
The report recommends that responsibility for all Youthful Offenders, their program and program development needs, be vested in the Director of the Youthful Offender Program, and that this individual enjoy a special relationship within the agency si…
youthful_offender policy operations staffing
Recommendation for continuum of assignment options Policy
A continuum of assignment options should be made available to the YO staff stationed at GDCC, including at least one diversion center, appropriate Youthful Offender institutions of the traditional and community models, and special transitional servi…
youthful_offender policy facilities operations
Recommendation for community center pre-release for all YOAs Policy
Every Youthful Offender should be pre-released through a community center program designed for that population and designed to 'fit with' other elements of the Youthful Offender Program.
youthful_offender reentry policy facilities
Recommendation for expanded programs and services Policy
Principal additions to programs and services should include far more involvement of citizens in the community, far greater use of community training resources, increased career development counseling, more vigorous and service oriented follow-up dur…
youthful_offender reentry policy drugs mental_health
Andromeda pre-release center admission procedure exception Case detail
One exception to the admission procedure situation is the state's pre-release center for drug rehabilitation, Andromeda. After a potential client has been cleared for participation by Central Office, a representative of the center visits the inmate …
drugs reentry facilities operations
YOA contract minimum stay at pre-release centers Policy
The new Y.O. contract is drawn up to reflect a minimum stay at the pre-release center, generally four to six months, depending on the type of program. Contract stipulations vary in their specificity from one center to another, but all include a cond…
youthful_offender reentry policy operations
Youthful Offenders not segregated at pre-release centers Finding
Youthful Offenders are not segregated in any way from the general population at pre-release centers. The services and programs available to them are identical with those available to other residents.
youthful_offender reentry facilities policy
Columbia House multi-step program phases Case detail
Columbia House offers a typical multi-step program: Phase I is a period of intensive group counseling emphasizing self-reliance. Phase II continues group counseling but adds a 'pre-employment workshop' including consumer education and job-seeking sk…
reentry facilities operations programs
Pre-release center services fall into three categories Finding
The services offered at most of the centers seem to fall into three major categories: counseling (individual and/or group), consumer education, and GED.
reentry facilities services education
Vocational counseling oriented to job contract fulfillment not career goals Finding
Any vocational counseling seems to be oriented toward helping the offender to fulfill his contract stipulation about obtaining a job rather than assisting him in identifying his long-term career goals.
reentry vocational_rehabilitation services
Academic programs restricted to GED or area vocational schools Finding
Academic programs are restricted to GED participation or, occasionally, attendance at one of the area vocational/technical schools. None of the facilities includes even a learning center for individualized program instruction. At best a Literacy Act…
education reentry facilities services
Only one center provides follow-up services Finding
Only one of the centers provides any 'follow-up' services and those are offered only to ex-offenders in the metro Atlanta area.
reentry services facilities
Four to six months too short for treatment program Finding
A number of staff persons suggest that four or six months is simply too short a time to establish an offender in a treatment program.
reentry staffing services operations
Youthful Offender population characteristics Finding
The gross characteristics of the Youthful Offender population indicate the difficulties that a work-release type center will have: young, male, single, typically a drug abuser with a reported 10th grade education and no previous employment.
youthful_offender demographics drugs education employment
No cohesive departmental philosophy of pre-release services Finding
There seems to be no cohesive Departmental philosophy of pre-release services. Many innovations happen locally at the instigation of local management or staff. Where even this interest level is not present, services are minimal. The pre-release serv…
reentry services policy operations
Recommendation for separate pre-release facility for youthful offenders Policy
It may well be the case that such a unique population with such specialized counseling needs would be more effectively served at a separate pre-release facility reserved specifically for Youthful Offenders.
youthful_offender reentry facilities policy
Recidivism definition used in report Methodology note
The definition of recidivism used in this report is the return-to-prison rate for specified time periods following release from incarceration. This measure captures data for Georgia reincarcerations only, but it has the virtue of being more complete…
recidivism methodology data_gap
Younger offenders are higher risk group Finding
Any comparison of the recidivism rates of younger offenders with those of inmates more generally should respect the well documented finding that younger offenders are a 'higher risk' group than are older, more mature individuals. This finding is ver…
recidivism demographics youthful_offender
GERC one-year rate extraordinarily high Finding
Examining the first year figures for GERC -- actually the last three quarters' exits for FY76 -- reveals a one-year rate of 15.5%. The two institutions which had phased out the Youthful Offender Program in FY76, Walker Correctional Institution and t…
recidivism facilities youthful_offender
GERC program implementation concerns Finding
The report expresses major concern in the area of implementation planning across the life of the Youthful Offender Program, especially since the program has been moved to the renovated GERC facility. Even as the report is being written, there remain…
youthful_offender vocational_rehabilitation facilities operations
Shortage of programs and chaotic opening may have contributed to high GERC return rate Finding
It is entirely possible that the shortage of programs and the many distractions to staff and inmates of the chaotic 'opening' that continues at GERC may have contributed to the disproportionately high return rate of that institution.
recidivism facilities youthful_offender operations
GII youngest average age among comparison institutions Finding
Offenders at GII, where the average age is the youngest at 20 to 21 years, show the highest return rate when three-year figures are examined.
recidivism demographics facilities
GII one-year rate relatively small but catches up by three years Finding
Inmates leaving the larger, more security oriented prison with longer term offenders, Georgia Industrial Institute, have a relatively small one year rate but more than 'catch up' by the end of a three year tracking period. Individuals who are locate…
recidivism facilities transfers
VR clients at GII have almost identical outcomes to YOAs Finding
The VR clients at GII have almost identical post-release outcomes when compared with the YOAs. Their return-to-prison rate seems to level off near but below the 30% figure. In the case of both programs, a higher percentage come back in the first yea…
recidivism vocational_rehabilitation youthful_offender supervision
Leveling off of return rates noted Trend
The change in the rate of 10 points between the first and second years and only 5 points between the second and third years evidences a leveling off not previously ascribed to Georgia's overall exiting population.
recidivism trend
Universal parole policy case made by evaluation Finding
The evaluation may inadvertently make the case for a universal parole policy. Although youthful offenders have their conditional release revoked and come back into the system earlier than other offenders, they do not ultimately fail at any higher ra…
parole policy recidivism youthful_offender
Early return may protect public and offender Finding
The fact that youthful offenders come back for failure to adjust early after release may operate to protect the public and the offender if his behavior is leading to a serious problem with the law.
parole recidivism youthful_offender public_safety
Parole selectivity rationale questioned Finding
The report assumes that the rationale for not offering all inmates parole is based on the assumption that selectivity will protect the public and retain the threatening offender in an incapacitated state. Yet the inmate will eventually be released w…
parole policy public_safety
On-Site Evaluation of Education Program at GERC findings Finding
A report entitled 'On-Site Evaluation of Education Program at GERCC' compiled in October 1976 by a team headed by William Crump noted that students were not making as rapid progress as expected in their academic education classes. The report also no…
education vocational_rehabilitation facilities staffing
GERC described as having impressive plans not yet implemented Quote
The institution may have '...impressive, innovative, and progressive plans which when implemented should have dramatic results...' (On-Site Evaluation, p.1), but the agency and not the local unit should bear the responsibility for systematic and sta…
facilities operations policy youthful_offender
Data source for recidivism tables Methodology note
Computer runs conducted in August 1977 by the evaluators and the Statistics Unit, GSA, with data current through 6-30-77 were used for Table 3.1. Data for Table 3.2 were run by the Systems Development Section, GSA, and analyzed by the Office of Rese…
methodology recidivism parole

Sources

6 cited sources backing this research.

Secondary Academic
Crime and Justice: The Criminal and Society (Radzinowicz & Wolfgang, 1971)
Leon Radzinowicz and Marvin E. Wolfgang (Eds.); Roger Hood and Richard Sparks (chapter authors) — Crime and Justice: The Criminal and Society (Jan 1, 1971)
Primary Official report
Evaluation of Georgia's Youthful Offender Program (Knott & Doughtie, 1975)
Elizabeth Knott and John Doughtie — Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation (Nov 1, 1975)
Primary Official report
On-Site Evaluation of Education Program at GERCC
William Crump — Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation (Oct 1, 1976)
Primary Official report
Operational Guidelines and Procedures of the Youthful Offender Division
Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation / Youthful Offender Division
Primary Official report
George H. Cox and Elaine T. DeCostanzo — Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Office of Research and Evaluation (Jan 1, 1978)
Primary Official report
The Relative Impact of Georgia's Institutional Training Programs on the Post-Release Behavior of Adult Male Offenders
Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation (Jul 1, 1977)

Key Entities

Organizations, people, facilities, and other named entities referenced in this research.

Andromeda Pre-Release Center [facility]
Bob Francis [person]
Columbia House [facility]
David Strauss [person]
Earned Time System [program]
Elaine T. DeCostanzo [person]
Elizabeth Knott [person]
George H. Cox [person]
Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole [organization]
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles [organization]
Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation [organization]
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center [facility]
Georgia Earned Release Center [facility]
Georgia Evaluation and Reception Center [facility]
Georgia Evaluation and Rehabilitation Center [facility]
Georgia Industrial Institute [facility]
Georgia Training and Development Center [facility]
Georgia Women's Correctional Institute [facility]
Gerald Willis [person]
Jack Fair [person]
John Doughtie [person]
Lee Correctional Institute [facility]
Lee Correctional Institution [facility]
Leon Radzinowicz [person]
Marvin E. Wolfgang [person]
Montgomery Correctional Institute [facility]
Montgomery Correctional Institution [facility]
Office of Research and Evaluation [organization]
Paul DeFrancis [person]
Richard Sparks [person]
Roger Hood [person]
Walker Correctional Institute [facility]
Walker Correctional Institution [facility]
William Crump [person]
Youthful Offender Act [legislation]
Youthful Offender Act of 1972 [legislation]
Youthful Offender Division [organization]
Youthful Offender Program [program]

Related Topics

Research topics that draw on data from this collection.

Historical Context
Georgia's prison system was built on a business model: the state takes custody of people, then puts their labor to work. That model began in 1866 with convict leasing, survived its formal abolition in 1908 as the county chain gang, and continues today in a system where most incarcerated workers are paid nothing. Across 150 years the documentary record — state leases, legislative investigations, federal consent decrees, and mortality data — shows a consistent pattern of labor extraction, near-total absence of independent oversight, and conditions that federal courts and the U.S. Department of Justice have repeatedly found unconstitutional.
1,793 data points
Parole & Sentencing
Georgia's parole pipeline has contracted sharply: the Board of Pardons and Paroles released 5,588 people in FY2025, down roughly 42 percent from 9,455 in FY2019, while the share of people leaving prison at sentence expiration climbed. Life-sentenced Georgians now serve an average of 28 years before release — up from less than nine in 1973 — and the Board granted parole in 4.5 percent of life cases in FY2024. The result is a smaller, later, more selective release system operating alongside an aging prison population and record corrections spending.
11,379 data points
Population & Demographics
Georgia holds roughly 47,000 to 53,600 people in state custody depending on which official count is used, at an incarceration rate of 881 per 100,000 residents — among the highest of any American state and above every independent democratic nation. That population is majority Black by a margin state demographics do not explain, aging fast, and increasingly serving life and long-term sentences, while the parole supervision population has fallen by more than half since 2011. That no single consistent public number describes the system's size is itself a central finding.
10,831 data points
Recidivism & Reentry
Georgia measures reentry success with a single narrow number — felony reconviction within three years — which has ranged from roughly 24 to 31 percent over the past decade and excludes misdemeanor arrests, parole and probation violations, reoffending after year three, and everyone who dies before the window closes. Behind that number, the state releases roughly 12,000 to 16,000 people a year — more than half at sentence expiration with no parole supervision — into a reentry system with 2,344 transitional beds, no dedicated reentry line item in the GDC budget, and a first-two-weeks death risk 12.7 times the general population's. The interventions that reduce recidivism are among the best-evidenced in corrections; Georgia's spending on them is a rounding error.
8,109 data points
Reform Models & Programs
Georgia has repeatedly designed, piloted, and evaluated evidence-based rehabilitation models — cognitive-skills curricula, earned-time incentives, intensive supervision, reentry housing, addiction treatment — and then starved them of scale and funding. The national evidence base is unambiguous: cognitive-behavioral programs reduce recidivism 20–30%, correctional education cuts recidivism odds by 43% and returns $4–$5 per dollar spent, and vocational completers in Georgia recidivate at roughly half the general rate. Georgia's FY2027 budget nonetheless cut education line items while adding $22.1 million in new surveillance spending, and the state still publishes no outcome data that would let the public judge whether any of its programs work.
11,653 data points
Women's Incarceration
Georgia confined 3,850 women as of April 2025, a population that has grown more than sevenfold since 1978 and that is now spread unevenly across five women's state prisons — two over capacity, one half empty — with 12 confirmed deaths in 2025. The state's female facilities carry the system's only women's Level III/IV mental health unit and its highest documented counts of retaliation, while two-thirds of incarcerated women are mothers whose children live, in 85% of cases, more than 50 miles from the prison gate. Reform has arrived on paper — the Georgia Survivor Justice Act in 2025, the Dignity Act in 2019 — but the data show a system still failing on healthcare, family contact, and accountability.
2,747 data points