Prison Labor & Economics
Key Findings
Critical data points synthesized across multiple research collections.
Forced Labor and Wage Suppression
Approximately 800,000 incarcerated workers labor inside U.S. state and federal prisons, producing more than $2 billion in goods and over $9 billion in services annually — numbers confirmed by GPS's review of *Prison Labor & Wage Exploitation in Georgia* research. Georgia's incarcerated workforce is embedded in that national system, compelled to maintain prison infrastructure, prepare food, and perform agricultural and industrial work under conditions the 13th Amendment explicitly permits as punishment for crime. The constitutional loophole is not a relic; it is the legal engine of a modern labor system.
Georgia pays its incarcerated workers wages that range from nothing to nominal amounts — fractions of a dollar per hour in the rare cases where any compensation exists at all. The state does not publish comprehensive wage data, a documented gap in the research record. What is documented is the downstream consequence: because workers earn almost nothing, their families become the system's true financial substrate. Commissary markups of 83% to 1,150% above retail (*Prison Labor & Wage Exploitation in Georgia*) are only sustainable because someone outside the walls must fund them. That someone is almost always a low-income family member, disproportionately Black and female, sending money from a household already strained by the loss of the incarcerated person's income.
The historical roots of this arrangement are not incidental. Georgia's convict leasing program — which emerged immediately after the Civil War in 1866 — established the template: state-owned labor, contracted to private interests, generating revenue for government while producing zero wages for workers. Modern prison labor retains the core structure while shedding the most legally vulnerable features. The 2010 Georgia Prison Strike, in which incarcerated people refused to work and demanded wages, demonstrated that incarcerated workers understand this history and resist it when conditions become intolerable. The state's response was punitive, not reformist.
The Commissary Extraction Machine
Georgia's commissary system is a captive retail monopoly operating at margins that would be illegal in any open market. GPS's review of commissary pricing data reveals the mechanics in granular detail: a 3oz packet of Maruchan ramen that retails for $0.15 at Walmart (bulk unit price) or $0.31 in a 12-pack costs $0.90 in Georgia's commissary — a markup of 190% to 500% depending on the comparison (*Georgia's Prison Commissary Extraction Machine*). Generic 200mg ibuprofen, available at $0.02 per tablet at Walmart, costs $0.17–$0.20 per tablet in commissary — a markup approaching 900%. Across 20 tracked items, the commissary system extracts an estimated $3–$5 million annually from families who have no alternative supplier.
The scale of that extraction becomes visible in sales volume data. A single ramen flavor sells 2.3 million units per year through Georgia's commissary system; beef sticks alone move over 1 million units annually. These are not luxury purchases — ramen and beef sticks are caloric supplements purchased by people whose state-provided meals are nutritionally inadequate. The commissary markup is, in this sense, a hunger tax: the state underfeeds people and then profits from their need to eat. Combined with families' $5.6 billion in annual national spending on commissary, phone calls, and necessities — at markups reaching 600% above retail cost (*Families as the Hidden Tax Base*) — the commissary system represents one of the most regressive transfer mechanisms in American public finance.
A critical data gap exists here: Georgia does not publicly disclose what percentage of commissary revenue is retained by the Department of Corrections versus contracted vendors, nor does it publish itemized profit-and-loss statements for commissary operations. GPS has requested this data; it has not been provided. What is known is that commissary profit funds are frequently used to offset corrections budgets — meaning the extraction from families directly subsidizes the cost of their loved ones' incarceration, a circular arrangement in which the punished pay for their own punishment.
Communications Monopoly and Kickback Revenue
The prison telecommunications industry generates $1.4 billion in annual revenue nationally, built on a monopoly architecture that eliminates consumer choice entirely (*Prison Communications & Financial Exploitation*). Securus Technologies and ViaPath Technologies (formerly GTL) together control approximately 80% of the U.S. market, serving roughly 3,450 correctional facilities and 1.1 million incarcerated individuals. In Georgia, this duopoly operates with the state's explicit financial cooperation: in fiscal year 2018–2019, Georgia received $8,062,200.60 in commission kickbacks from prison phone revenue — the third-highest commission total in the nation (*Prison Communications & Financial Exploitation*).
The commission structure is the key to understanding why states maintain these monopoly contracts despite their demonstrably harmful effects on families and recidivism outcomes. The higher the phone rates, the higher the commission check the state receives. Georgia's nearly $8.1 million in annual kickback revenue creates a direct financial incentive for the Department of Corrections to maintain high-rate contracts rather than pursue lower-cost alternatives or the free calling models adopted by some jurisdictions. Organizations like Ameelio have developed zero-cost communication platforms, but their adoption requires states to forgo commission revenue — a trade Georgia has not made.
Nationally, families spend $1.8 billion annually on travel for prison visits (*Families as the Hidden Tax Base*), averaging $1,703 per year for the 51% of families who visit — with Black family members averaging $2,256 annually, a disparity that reflects both geographic placement of prisons in rural areas and the racial composition of Georgia's incarcerated population. When phone calls cost prohibitive amounts and visits require hundreds of dollars in travel, family contact deteriorates — and research consistently links maintained family contact to reduced recidivism. The communications extraction economy is, therefore, simultaneously a revenue mechanism and a recidivism driver.
The Hidden Tax on Families
The most comprehensive recent accounting of incarceration's true cost appears in a June 2025 FWD.us report developed with Duke University and NORC at the University of Chicago: the total annual cost to families of incarcerated people is nearly $350 billion — almost four times the $89 billion taxpayers spend on jails and prisons (*Families as the Hidden Tax Base*). This figure reframes the entire fiscal debate about incarceration. The state of Georgia spends approximately $1.8 billion annually on its prison system; the families bearing the hidden costs of that system spend multiples more, in aggregate, without receiving any of the public benefits that would justify taxation.
The component costs are staggering in their specificity. Direct out-of-pocket spending averages $4,200 per year per family — more than 27% of income for a family at the federal poverty line. Families lose $6.7 billion annually in lost household income when a member is incarcerated. They spend $2.3 billion annually on childcare for children of incarcerated parents, averaging $5,337 per year among those who take on childcare responsibilities. They spend $1.8 billion on visit travel. And they spend $5.6 billion on commissary, phone calls, and basic necessities at markups reaching 600% above retail. These costs are not distributed randomly: they fall with crushing disproportionality on Black families, low-income families, and the women — mothers, wives, sisters, daughters — who constitute the majority of support networks for incarcerated men.
What makes this a "hidden tax" rather than simply a private hardship is that these expenditures substitute for state spending. When families send $200 to commissary so an incarcerated person can buy food and hygiene products the state inadequately provides, they are subsidizing the Department of Corrections budget. When they spend thousands on phone calls, they are funding both the telecommunications industry and state commission revenue. The Georgia state budget of $1.712 billion for FY2026 (*Georgia Department of Corrections: Budget & Spending Trends*) does not reflect the true cost of Georgia's incarceration system — it reflects only the portion the state has chosen to account for publicly.
Labor Economics and the GDC Budget
The Georgia Department of Corrections operates on a budget that has grown significantly in recent years, driven primarily by staffing costs in a context of acute workforce crisis. GDC's FY2025 actual expenditures totaled $1.914 billion — a dramatic spike from FY2024's $1.527 billion (*Georgia Department of Corrections: Budget & Spending Trends*). The FY2026 amended budget stands at $1.799 billion, with an FY2027 budget of $1.779 billion. A meaningful portion of this growth reflects overtime costs: nationally, understaffing cost states over $2 billion in overtime in 2024 alone, an 80% increase from five years earlier (*Staffing Crisis & Correctional Officer Turnover*). With nearly 50% of GDC's 5,991 budgeted correctional officer positions vacant — 2,985 empty posts — Georgia is spending heavily to compensate for a workforce it cannot retain.
The fiscal irony is structural: the state underpays incarcerated workers to near-zero wages while spending billions in overtime to cover the correctional officer shifts that a better-compensated, better-staffed workforce might not require. Meanwhile, prison labor directly offsets operational costs — incarcerated people cook the food, clean the facilities, maintain the grounds, and perform the administrative tasks that would otherwise require paid civilian employees. The economic value of that labor is embedded invisibly in GDC's budget, never appearing as a wage line because it is never paid as a wage.
The $82.2 million Georgia received in federal VOI/TIS grants between FY1996 and FY2001 — used to create 4,132 prison beds (*Truth in Sentencing & Fiscal Impact*) — illustrates how federal incentive structures shaped Georgia's carceral growth. Truth-in-sentencing grants rewarded states for building more prison capacity and eliminating parole, locking in infrastructure costs that persist for decades. Georgia now incarcerates at the 7th highest rate nationally — 881 per 100,000 residents — maintaining a population that costs $1.8 billion annually and produces, by the evidence, neither safety nor rehabilitation at scale. Homicides inside Georgia prisons surged from 8 in 2018 to over 100 in 2024 (*The Case for Decarceration in Georgia*), a trajectory that occurred while the prison budget grew — undermining any claim that increased spending translates to improved outcomes.
Recidivism and the Economics of Failure
Georgia reports a three-year felony reconviction rate of approximately 25–27% — one of the lowest figures reported nationally (*Recidivism & Reentry Failures in Georgia*). This statistic requires scrutiny. The national average recidivism rate, depending on methodology, ranges from 39% to 44%; close to two-thirds of people released from prison nationally are rearrested within three years (*National Prison Reform Models & Georgia Comparison*). Georgia's lower figure likely reflects measurement choices — felony reconviction is a narrower metric than rearrest — rather than superior rehabilitation outcomes. With 14,000–16,000 people released from Georgia prisons annually and nearly 60% of formerly incarcerated people remaining unemployed a year after release nationally, the economic reintegration picture is bleak.
The failure of reentry is not accidental — it is the predictable output of a system that extracts labor and commissary revenue during incarceration while providing minimal programming, no meaningful wages, and no accumulated savings at release. Evidence-based programs demonstrate that this outcome is not inevitable: Thinking for a Change participants recidivated at 23% versus 36% in control groups; RSVP achieved up to 80% reduction in violent rearrests among participants (*Evidence-Based Rehabilitation Curricula; Prison Program Structure Models*). The Bard Prison Initiative enrolls 400 students in seven New York prisons; the Prison Entrepreneurship Program reaches over 6,000 men annually across 80 Texas facilities. Georgia has no equivalent at scale.
The economics of recidivism are the economics of the extraction system made visible over time. A person released with no wages saved, a family financially depleted by years of commissary and phone-call costs, and a labor market that screens out felony convictions is a person positioned to return to prison — generating another cycle of extraction. The U.S. reduced its prison population by 25% between 2009 and 2021 while crime continued to fall (*The Case for Decarceration in Georgia*); violent crime rates by 2024 were 53% below their 1991 peak. The evidence that mass incarceration produces safety is weak. The evidence that it produces profit — for commissary vendors, telecommunications companies, and the state itself — is documented in the data above.
Related Topics
Explore related areas of research.
Related Articles
3 GPS articles connected to this topic.
Contributing Collections
Research collections that contribute data to this topic.
Sources
100 cited sources across all contributing collections.